Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T07:33:26.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Physician Countersuit: ‘More Than Having to Say You're Sorry’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Madeline J. Tillotson
Affiliation:
Center for Law and Health Sciences, Boston University School of Law
Elliot L. Sagall
Affiliation:
American Society of Law & Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston College Law School

Extract

Growing dissatisfaction with traditional bar association grievance mechanisms as a deterrent against the institution of “frivolous” medical malpractice suits has promoted physicians to explore other methods of legal redress against “unscrupulous” lawyers. One avenue of recourse now being popularized among physicians is a countersuit by defendant physician against plaintiff patients and attorneys. The reasoning behind this approach has been bluntly expressed by a recent successful countersuitor, Dr. Leonard Berlin, “The school bully who harasses innocent children in the playground isn't stopped by reporting to his parents—he's stopped only by a punch in the face. Lawyers who abuse the court systems similarly can only be stopped through the same court system.”

Attractive as the countersuit attack may appear on the surface, the effectiveness of such a retaliatory measure in stemming medical malpractice litigation is questionable and doubtful.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

“Dr. Berlin Tells Why He Countersued”, American Medical News, Impact/4, March 28, 1977.Google Scholar
Prosser, , Law of Torts, 4th ed., West Publishing Co., 1971, pp. 777781.Google Scholar
Kisnera, , Malicious Prosecution: An Effective Attack on Spurious Medical Malpractice Claims? 26 Case Western Reserve Law Review 653 (1976).Google Scholar
Norton V. Hines 49 Cal. App. 3rd 917. 123 Cal. Reptr. 237 (1975).Google Scholar
See supra, Note 3 at p. 660.Google Scholar
Carter v. Lykes, 262 N.C. 345, 352–353, 137 S.E.2d 139 (1964).Google Scholar
Patete v. Baker, 302 N.E.2d 416, 14 III. App. 3rd 385 (1973).Google Scholar
Cassidy v. Cain, 251 N.E.2d 852 (1969).Google Scholar
Berlin v. Nathan, 75 ML 542, Cir. Ct. Cook County III., June 1, 1076.Google Scholar
Giampietroa, , Doctor Finds New Cure for Malpractice Suits, Illinois Medical Journal, July, 1976.Google Scholar
Edelman, Kim, , What is the Attorney's Duty in a Medical Malpractice Case? The Hospital Medical Staff 2 (December 14, 1976).Google Scholar
Helling v. Carey, 519 P.2d 981 (Wash 1974). Here the court held defendant physicians negligent in failing to administer glaucoma test although admitting universal practice not to administer test to patients under the age of 40.Google Scholar
Hirsh, Malpractice Countersuits Funds New Booby Trap for Doctors, Medical Economics, 187 (April 4, 1977.).Google Scholar

Additional References

Tondel, Chittenden, , “Work of the Medical Professional Liability Commission”, 62 American Bar Association Journal 1580–84 (1976)Google Scholar
Note, “Malicious Prosecution: An Effective Attack on Spurious Medical Malpractice Claims,” 26 Case Western Reserve Law Review 653–86 (1976)Google Scholar
Note, “Medical Malpractice Arbitration: A Comparative Analysis,” 62 Virginia Law Review 1285-310 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Note, “Medical Malpractice — Constitutionality of Limits on Liability,” 78 West Virginia Law Review 381–90 (1976)Google Scholar
Note, “Medical Products and Services Liability: Public Policy Requires Legislative Innovation and Judicial Restraint,” 53 Denver Law Journal 387–411 (1976)Google Scholar
Note, “Physician Countersuits: Malicious Prosecution, Defamation and Abuse of Process as Remedies for Meritless Medical Malpractice Suits,” 45 Cincinnati Law Review 604 (1976)Google Scholar
Note, “Torts — Medical Malpractice,” 1976 Annual Survey of American Law 240–55 (1976).Google Scholar
Smith, , Medical Malpractice: The Countersuit Fad, 42 Trial 44, Dec. 1976.Google Scholar
Reilly, , The Case Against Countersuit, American Medical News, Impact/3, Mar. 25, 1977.Google Scholar
Griffith, , Countersuits Philadelphia Medicine 446, Nov. 1976.Google Scholar
Freidberg, , Pros and Cons of Malpractice Countersuits, Resident & Staff Physician 104 June 1977 reprinted from Malpractice Digest (St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Co.) Sept/Oct. 1976.Google Scholar
Professional Malpractice 20 American Trial Lawyers Association Law Reporter 229, June 1977.Google Scholar