Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:58:05.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Phytoseiidae (Acarina) of Central America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. A. Chant  and
E. W. Baker
D. A. Chant
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory, Canada Department of Agriculture, Vineland Station, Ontario
E. W. Baker
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Division,Agricultural Research Service,U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 97 , Supplement S41 , 1965 , pp. 3 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Publication No. 61, Research Laborartory, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Vineland Station, Ontario, Preliminary work for the paper was done while Dr. Chant was on the staff of the Entomology Research Institute, Belleville, Ontario.

2

Present Address: Dept.of Biological Control, University of California, Riverside, California.

References

REFERENCES

Banks, N. 1904. A treatise on the Acarina or mites, Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 28, 114 pp.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1905. Descriptions of some new mites. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 7: 133–142.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1915. The Acarina or mites. U.S. Dep. Agric. Rep. 108, 153 pp.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1957. Descriptions of two new phytoseiid genera (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with a note on the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1902. Canad. Ent. 89: 357–363.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites. Part II. A taxonomic review of the family Phytoseiidae, with descriptions of 38 new species. Canad. Ent. 91, Suppl. 12: 45–164.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A. In press. Generic concepts in the Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Canad. Ent.Google Scholar
Chant, D. A., and Athias-Henriot, C.. 1960. The genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1902 (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga 5: 213–228.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, F., and Baker, E. W.. 1953. A guide to the predatory phytoseiid mites of the United States. Pinellas Biol. Lab. Publ., 1.Google Scholar
De Leon, D. 1957. Three new Typhlodromus from southern Florida (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Ent. 40: 141–144.Google Scholar
De Leon, D. 1959a. A new genus and three new species of phytoseiid mites from Mexico with collection records on Phytoseius plumifer (C. and F.) and P. macropilis (Banks). Ent. News 70: 147–152.Google Scholar
De Leon, D. 1959b. Seven new Typhlodromus from Mexico with collection notes on three other species (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Ent. 42: 113–121.Google Scholar
De Leon, D. 1959c. The genus Typhlodromus in Mexico (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Florida Ent. 42: 123–129.Google Scholar
De Leon, D. 1960. Undescribed Phytoseius from Florida and Mexico (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Ent. News 71: 269, 270.Google Scholar
Ehara, S. 1959. Some predatory mites of the genera Typhlodromus and Amblyseius from Japan (Phytoseiidae). Acarologia 1: 285–295.Google Scholar
Evans, G. O. 1952. On a new predatory mite of economic importance. Bull. ent. Res. 43: 397–401Google Scholar
Garman, P. 1958. New species belonging to the genera Amblyseius and Amblyseiopsis with keys to Amblyseius, Amblyseiopsis, and Phytoseiulus. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 51: 69–79.Google Scholar
Garman, P., and McGregor, E. A.. 1956. Four new predaceous mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bull. So. Calif. Acad. Sci. 55: 7–13.Google Scholar
Kennett, C. E. 1958. Some predacious mites of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Accosejinae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae, Aceosejidae) from Central California with descriptions of new species. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 51: 471–479.Google Scholar
Muma, M. 1955. Phytoseiidae (Acarina) associated with citrus in Florida. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 48: 262.Google Scholar
Muma, M. 1961. Subfamilies, genera, and species of Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Bull. Fla. St. Mus. 5: 267–302.Google Scholar
Muma, M. 1962. New Phytoseiidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata) from Florida. Florida Ent. 45: 1–10.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H. H. J. 1951. A taxonomic study of the Phytoseiinae (Family Laelaptidae) predaceous upon Tetranychidae of economic importance. Zool. Verh., Leiden 12, 64 pp.Google Scholar
Pritchard, A. E., and Baker, E. W.. 1962. Mites of the family Phytoseiidae from Central Africa, with remarks on genera of the world. Hilgardia 33: 205–309.Google Scholar
Schuster, R. O., and Pritchard, A. E.. 1963. Phytoseiid mites of California. Hilgardia 34: 191–285.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B. A. 1959. A new subgenus and species of the genus Phytoseius Ribaga, 1902 (Phytoseiidae, Parasitiformes). Zool. Zhurn. 39: 1361–1365.Google Scholar
Wainstein, B. A. 1962. Revision du genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1957, et systematique de la famille des Phytoseiidae (Berlese, 1916) (Acarina: Parasitiformes). Acarologia 4: 5–30.Google Scholar