Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-15T17:43:28.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION DES TRICHOPTèRES CANADIENS: II. Les Glossosomatidae et Philopotamidae (Annulipalpia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. Schmid
Get access

Résumé

Les familles des Glossosomatidae et Philopotamidae comptent respectivement 29 et 14 espèces connues à ce jour du Canada et des Etats adjacents. Dans les pages suivantes, on trouvera les diagnoses familiales, sous-familiales, génériques, subgénériques et spécifiques de tous les taxa constituant ces deux familles, de même que les tables dichotomiques permettant de s'y rapporter. Chaque espèce est décrite et figurée, ses parentés et ses synonymes établis et sa répartition géographique indiquée par une carte géographique la résumant.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 114 , Supplement S122 , 1982 , pp. 1 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Anderson, N.H. 1976. The distribution and biology of the Oregon Trichoptera. Tech. Bull.agric. Exp. Stn Oregon St. Univ. 152pp.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1895. New neuropteroid insects. Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 22: 313–316.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1897. New North American neuropteroid insects. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 24: 21–31.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1900. Papers from the Harriman Alaska expedition. Entomological results (4) neuropteroid insects. Wash. Acad. Sci. Proc. 2: 465–473.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1904a. Neuropteroid insects from New-Mexico. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 30: 97–110.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1904b. A list of neuropteroid insects, exclusive of Odonata, from the vicinity of Washington D.C. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 6(4: 201–217.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1911. Descriptions of new species of North American neuropteroid insects. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 37(4): 350–360.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1914. American Trichoptera — notes and descriptions. Can. Ent. 46: 149–156, 201–205, 252–258, 261–268.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1924. Descriptions of new neuropteroid insects. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. 65: 421–455.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1930. New neuropteroid Insects from the United States. Psyche, Camb. 37: 223–233.Google Scholar
Banks, N. 1936. Four new Trichoptera from the United States. Arbeiten über Morphologische and Taxo-nomishe Entomologie aus Berlin-Dahlem, pp. 265–268.Google Scholar
Betten, C. 1934. The caddis flies or Trichoptera of New-York State. N. Y. St. Mus. Bull. 292. 576 pp.Google Scholar
Betten, C. et Mosely, M.E.. 1940. The Francis Walker types of Trichoptera in the British Museum. London. 248 pp.Google Scholar
Botosaneanu, L. 1955. Note Trichopterologice I. Bul. Stiint. Agr. Sect. Geol. Geogr. 7(3): 791–802.Google Scholar
Corbet, P.S., Schmid, F. et Augustin, C.L.. 1966. The Trichoptera of St.Helen's Island, Montreal. I. The species present and their relative abundance at light. Can. Ent. 98(12): 1284–1298.Google Scholar
Curtis, J. 1834. Descriptions of some hitherto nondescript British species of mayflies of anglers. London and Edinburgh Philos. Mag. and Jour. of Sci. 4: 120-125, 212–218.Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1941. Descriptions and notes of new and little known species of Trichoptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 34: 195–203.Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1942. Descriptions of new Trichoptera from the United States. Can. Ent. 54: 46–51.Google Scholar
Denning, D.G. 1949. New and little known caddis-flies. Am. Midl. Nat. 42: 112–122.Google Scholar
Duranthon-Gautheron, F. 1970. Notes écologiques sur les Trichoptères de la Station de Biologie de St.-Hippolyte (Comté de Terrebonne, Québec). Thése, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Flint, O.S. 1974. The genus Culoptila Mosely in the United States,with two combinations. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 76(3): 284.Google Scholar
Hagen, H.A. 1861. Synopsis of the Neuroptera of North America with a list of the South American species. Smithson. Inst. misc. Collns. 347 pp.Google Scholar
Harper, P.P., Pillon, J.-G. et Perron, J.-M.. 1975. Insectes aquatiques du nord du Québec. Annls Soc. ent. Québ. 20(1): 33–43.Google Scholar
Klapalek, F. 1892. Trichopterologicky Vijzkum Cech. v.r. 1891. Ropz. Ceske Acad Cis Frant. Jos., Praze 5. 22pp.Google Scholar
Kloet, G.S. et Hincks, W.D.. 1944. Nomenclatorial notes on two generic names in the Trichoptera. Entomologist 77: 97.Google Scholar
Leonard, J.W. et Leonard, F.A.. 1949. Noteworthy records of caddis flies from Michigan, with descriptions of new species. Occ. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 35 pp.Google Scholar
Ling, Shao-win. 1938. A few caddisflies in the Collection of the California Academy of Sciences. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 14: 59–69.Google Scholar
Martynov, A.V. 1913. Contribution to the knowledge of the trichopterous fauna of the Caucasus (en russe), Trav. Lab. Zool. Univ. Warsaw. 111 pp.Google Scholar
Martynov, A.V. 1927. Contributions to the Aquatic Entomofauna of Turkestan I. Ann. Mus. Zool. Acad. Sci. URSS 28: 162–193.Google Scholar
Martynov, A.V. 1934. The Trichoptera Annulipalpia of the URSS. Leningrad. 343 pp.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1865. Trichoptera Britannica. A monograph of the British species of caddis-flies Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. (3)5. 184 pp.Google Scholar
McLachlan, R. 1868. Contribution to the knowledge of European Trichoptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond.: 289–308.Google Scholar
Milne, L.J. 1934 Studies in North American Trichoptera. I, 1934: I–19. Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Milne, L.J. 1935 Studies in North American Trichoptera. II, 1935: 20–55. Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Milne, L.J. 1936 Studies in North American Trichoptera. III, 1936: 56–128. Cambridge (Mass.).Google Scholar
Mosely, M.E. 1934. New exotic Hydroptilidae. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 82(1): 137–163.Google Scholar
Mosely, M.E. 1954. The Protoptila group of the Glossosomatinae. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. Lond. 3(9):315–346.Google Scholar
Nimmo, A.P. 1966. A list of Trichoptera taken at Montreal and Chambly, Québec, with descriptions of three new species. Can. Ent. 98(7): 688–693.Google Scholar
Nimmo, A.P. 1974. The adult Trichoptera of Alberta and eastern British Columbia and their post-glacial origin II. The families Glossosomatidae and Philopotamtdae. Quaest. ent. 101: 315–349.Google Scholar
Nimmo, A.P. 1977. The adult Trichoptera of Alberta and eastern British Columbia and their post-glacial origin II. The families Glossosomatidae and Philopotamidae supplement I. Quaest. ent. 13: 69–71.Google Scholar
Nimmo, A.P. et Scudder, G.G.E.. 1978. An annotated checklist of the Trichoptera of British Columbia. Syesis: 117–133.Google Scholar
Radford, D.S. et Hartland-Rowe, R.. 1971. A preliminary investigation of bottom fauna and invertebrate drift in a regulated stream in Alberta. J. appl. Ecol. 8: 883–903.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1928. Descriptions of neartic caddis-flies with special reference to the Illinois species. III. nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 21(4): 101–183.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1941. Descriptions and records of North American Trichoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 67: 35–126.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1942. The caddis flies, or Trichoptera, of Illinois Ill. nat. Hist. Surv. 23(1). 326pp.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1941. Descriptions and records of North American Trichoptera with synoptic notes. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 73: 125–168.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1951. The caddisfly genus Anagapetus. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 27: 140–144.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. 1956. Evolution and Classification of the Mountain Caddis-Flies. Univ. of Illinois Press. 213 pp.Google Scholar
Ross, H.H. et Spencer, G.J.. 1952. A preliminary list of the Trichoptera of British Columbia. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 48: 43–51.Google Scholar
Roy, D. et Harper, P.P.. 1975. Nouvelles mentions de Trichoptères du Quèbec et description de Limnephilus nimmoi sp.n. J. canad. Zool. 53(8): 1080–1088.Google Scholar
Schmid, F. et Guppy, R.. 1952. An annoted list of Trichoptera collected on Vancouver Island. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 48: 41–42.Google Scholar
Schmid, F. et Guppy, R.. 1980. Les insectes et arachnides du Canada. lère Partie. Genera des Trichoptères du Canada et des Etats adjacents. Agriculture Can. Publ. 692 296 pp.Google Scholar
Schmid, F. et Guppy, R.. 1981. Revision des Trichoptères canadiens. I. La famille des Rhyacophilidae. Mem. Soc. ent. Can. 116. 83 pp.Google Scholar
Stephens, J.F. 1829. A Systematic Catalogue of British Insects I. Londres. 416 pp.Google Scholar
Ulmer, G. 1909. Einige Neue Exotische Trichopteren. Notes Leyd. Mus. 31: 125–142.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1852. Catalogue of the Specimens of Neuropterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum. Pt I. London. 192 pp.Google Scholar
Wallengren, H.J.D. 1891. Skandinaviens Neuroptera. Andra Afdelningen. Svensk. Vet. Akad. Handl. 24(10). 173 pp.Google Scholar
Westwood, J.O. 1840. An Introduction to the Modern Classification of Insects. Generic Synopsis. London. 2: 49–51.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B. 1961. The rediscovery of an unusual North American phryganeid with some additional records of caddis-flies from Newfoundland. Can. Ent. 43(8): 695–702.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B. 1977. Larvae of North American Caddisfly Genera. Univ. of Toronto Press. 401 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, N.E. et Williams, D.D.. 1979. Distribution and feeding records of the caddisflies of the Matamek River Region, Québec. Can. J. Zool. 57: 2402–2412.Google Scholar