Abe, S. 1932. The nest of Bombus diversus Smith. Kontyû 5: 245–247.Google Scholar

Acerbi, J. 1802. Travels through Sweden, Finland and Lapland, to the North Cape, in the years 1798 and 1799. Vol. 2, 376 pp., 8 pls. (unnumbered). Mawman, London.Google Scholar

Adams, C. C., et al. 1920. Plants and animals of Mount Marcy, New York, II. Ecology 1(3): 204–233 (pp. 212, 226, 231).Google Scholar

Akerberg, E., and Lesinš, S. K.. 1949. Insect pollinating alfalfa in central Sweden. A. Rep. agric. Coll., Sweden 16: 630–643.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1889. Hymenopterologische beobachtungen. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen 10: 553–555.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1898. Zwei färbungen von Bombus pratorum L. Ent. Nachr. 24(10): 158.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1900. Bombus soröensis F., form proteus Gerst. und seine farben-varietäten. Ent. Nachr. 26(12): 184–190.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1909 a. Beitrage zur kenntnis der apidenfauna von Westpreussen. Ber. westpreuss. bot.-zool. Ver. (Danzig) 31: 101–123.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1909 b. Beitrage zur kenntnis der apidenfauna von Ostpreussen. Schr. phys.-ökon. Ges. Konigsb. 50(h. 3): 320–345.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1912 a. Die bienenfauna von Westpreussen. Ber. westpreuss. bot.-zool. Ver. (Danzig) 34: 1–94, taf. 1, 2.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1912 b. Die bienenfauna von Ostpreussen. Schr. phys.-ökon. Ges. Königsb. 53: 114–182.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1913. Die bienenfauna von Bremen. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen 22 (h. 1): 1–220.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1915. Beitrag zur bienenfauna von Ostfriesland. Festschr. naturf. Ges., Emden, pp. 197–241.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1933. Ergebnisse einer zoologischen sammelreise nach Brasilien, insbesondere in das Amazonasgebiet, ausgeführt von Dr. H. Zerny. IX. Teil. Hymenoptera: Apidae. Annln naturh. Mus. Wien 46: 303–307 (1932).Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1935. Beitrag zur kenntnis der bienenfauna von Kleinasien. Ent. Rdsch. 52(10): 129–132Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1935. Beitrag zur kenntnis der bienenfauna von Kleinasien. Ent. Rdsch. 52(11): 148–152Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1935. Beitrag zur kenntnis der bienenfauna von Kleinasien. Ent. Rdsch. 52(12): 153–162.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1936. Ueber eine bienenausbeute aus Venezuela. Veröff. dt. Kolon-u. Übersee-Mus. Bremen 1 (h. 3): 316–320.Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1940. Die insekten des naturschutzparkes der Lüneburger Heide. Abh. naturw. Ver. Bremen 31 (h. 4): 750–762 (1939–40).Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1878. Les insectes. Organisation-moeurs chasse-collection-classification. Histoire naturelle des orthoptères- neuroptères- hyménoptères- diptères- aptères, etc. Mus. Ent. 3: vii + 427 pp., 24 pls. (col.). (Edited by Rothchild, J., Paris.)Google Scholar

Alfken, J. D. 1945. Red clover and bumble bees (Bombus). Canterbury Chamber Com. agric. Bull. 190, 4 pp. (Canterbury Agric. Coll., N.Z.)Google Scholar

Argumosa y Valdes, J. A. 1949. “Bahnung” entomologico en la “Wistaria chinensis” D. C. Tomo extraord. R. Soc. cap. hist. nat., Madrid, pp. 174–175 (1946).Google Scholar

Armbruster, L. 1914. Problème des hummelstaates. Biol. Zbl. 34: 685–702, 1 pl., 1 fig.Google Scholar

Armbruster, L., and Oenike, G.. 1929. Die pollenformen als mittel zur honigherkunftbestimmung. Büch. Bienenk. X, pp. 1–116, Neumünster.Google Scholar

Armitage, K. B. 1965. Notes on the biology of Philanthus bicinctus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 38(2): 89–100.Google Scholar

Armstrong, E. A. 1953. Nidicoles and parasites of the wren. Ir. Nat. J. 11(3): 57–64.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H. 1890. On the Hymenoptera of Colorado; descriptions of new species (Part 1), and a list of the species found in the State (Part 2). Colo. biol. Ass. Bull. 1, 32 pp.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H. 1894. The habits of the aculeate Hymenoptera—I. Psyche, Camb. 7: 19–26; II, 7: 39–46; III, 7: 59–66; IV, 7: 75–79.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H. 1900. Report upon the aculeate Hymenoptera of the islands of St. Vincent and Grenada, with additions to the parasitic Hymenoptera and a list of the described Hymenoptera of the West Indies. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., Pt. 2, pp. 207–367.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H. 1902 a. A new bumble bee from Colorado. Ent. News 13: 50.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H. 1902 b. Papers from the Harriman Alaska Expedition XXVIII: Hymenoptera. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 4: 117–274, pls. ix–xi.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H. 1904. Insects, Part II. (Bombus, Psithyrus, pp. 129–137.) In: Harriman Alaska Expedition. Harr. Alask. Ser. (Smithson. Inst.), Vol. ix, ix + 284 pp. Doubleday, Page, New York.Google Scholar

Ashmead, W. H., et al. 1898. Reports upon the insects, spider, mites, and myriapods collected by Dr. L. Stejneger and Mr. G. E. H. Barrett-Hamilton on the Commander Islands. Appendix 1, pp. 328–351. To: The fur seals and fur-seal islands of the North Pacific Ocean, Pt. 4, pp. 1–384, 113 pls. (89 pls., 24 maps). U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington.Google Scholar

Atanassov, N. 1939. Beitrag zur studium der hummel fauna Bulgariens. Mitt. bulgar. ent. Ges. Sofia 10: 91–109.Google Scholar

Atwood, C. E. 1933. Studies on the Apoidea of western Nova Scotia with special reference to visitors to apple blossoms. Can. J. Res. 9: 443–457.Google Scholar

Audoin, J. V. [with Lachat.] 1821. Observations sur les organes copulateurs mâle des bourdons. Ann. gén. Sci. Phys. 8: 285–289.Google Scholar

Aurivillius, C. 1890. Grönlands insektsfauna. I: Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera. K. svenska Vetensk-Akad. Handl. 15 (afd. 4, No. 1): 1–33 + 1 p. index + 3 pls.Google Scholar

Aurivillius, C. 1903. Svensk insektfauna 13. Ent. Tidskr. 24: 129–218.Google Scholar

Babiy, P. P. 1925. Neues zum hummelproblem. Z. wiss. Zool. 125: 502–512, 2 figs.Google Scholar

Babiy, P. P. 1939. Apis griseocollis De Geer – Bombus separatus Cresson (Hymenoptera: Bombidae). Ent. News 50(1): 22–23.Google Scholar

Babiy, P. P. 1954(?). Zur hummelfauna der Salzburger Landes. Mitt. naturw. ArbGemein Haus Nat. Salzb. 3–4: 20–21 (1952–1953).Google Scholar

Bachmann, M. 1911–1912. Beobachtungen über blütenbesuchende insekten in der Eichstätter Alp. Mitt. munch. ent. Ges. 2: 74–80, 91–94 (1911); 3: 14–16, 28–32, 41–48, 59–64, 96–105 (1912).Google Scholar

Bachmann, M. 1913–1914. Blütenbiologische spaziergänge. Int. ent. Z. (Guben) 27: 215–216; 223–224, 230–231, 237 (1913); 28: 87–89, 93–95, 100–101, 106–107, 110–111, 114–115 (1914).Google Scholar

Bachmann, M. 1915. Biologische beobachtungen an hummeln. Mitt. munch. ent. Ges. 6: 71–111.Google Scholar

Bachmann, M. 1916. Beobachtungen vor dem hummelnest. Int. ent. Z. (Guben) 29: 89–90, 93–94, 98–99, 103–104; 30: 1–3.Google Scholar

Bachmann, M. 1916–1917. Vom farbensinn der bienen. Int. ent. Z. (Guben) 30: 65–66, 69–70, 73–74, 77–78 (1916); 30: 82–83, 86–87 (1917).Google Scholar

Bailey, W. W. 1879. Humble bees and the Gerardia flava. Am. Nat. 13: 649.Google Scholar

Ball, P. J. 1914. Les bourdons de la Belgique. Ann. Soc. ent. Belg. 58: 77–108, 1 pl.Google Scholar

Balles, H. 1930. Beiträge zur kenntnis der hymenopterenfauna Bodens: III–IV. Arch. Insektenk. Oberrheingeb. 2: 161–202.Google Scholar

Banks, N. 1919. The Acarina collected by the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–18. Rep. Can. Arctic Exped., Vol. III, Insects, pt. H, pp. IIH–13H.Google Scholar

Barendrecht., G. 1931. Die Corpora peduculata bei die gattungen Bombus und Psithyrus. Acta zool. 12: 153–204, 23 figs.Google Scholar

Barendrecht., G. 1941. Hommels uit het Noorden. Ent. Ber., Amst. 10: 331–335.Google Scholar

Beal, W. G. 1874. The fertilization of gentians by humblebees. Am. Nat. 8: 180–181, 226.Google Scholar

Beal, W. G. 1887. Bumble bees a great help in fertilizing red clover (pp. 325–328). In: Grasses of North America. Thorpe & Godfrey, Lansing, Mich.Google Scholar

Beck, D. E. 1933. A morphological study of the male genitalia of various genera of bees. Utah Acad. Sci. 10: 89–137, pls. 1–8.Google Scholar

Belt, T. 1878. The importation of bumble bees into New Zealand. Sci. Gossip 14: 89–90.Google Scholar

Benary, H. 1900. Eine getäuschte hummel, III. Z. Ent. 5: 203.Google Scholar

Benetti, V. 1902. Ricerche biologiche sui bombi. Monitore zool. ital. 13 (suppl.): 38–40.Google Scholar

Bengtsson, S. 1903. Studier och iakttagelser öfver humlor. Ark. Zool. 1: 197–222.Google Scholar

Bennett, A. W. 1883. On the constancy of insects in their visits to flowers. J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 17: 175–185.Google Scholar

Benoist, R. 1927. Bombus lapidarius L. st. atlanticus R. Ben. Bull. Soc. sci. nat., Maroc (1927): 212.Google Scholar

Benoist, R. 1928. Étude sur la faune des hyménoptères des Alpes Françaises. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 97: 389–417.Google Scholar

Benson, R. B., et al. 1937. Annex to 5th report of committee on general nomenclature, etc., pp. 81–94. In: The generic names of British insects. Part 5, pp. 81–149. Royal Ent. Soc., London.Google Scholar

Bequaert, J. 1920 a. Scientific results of the Katmai Expedition of the National Geographic Society. Ohio J. Sci. 20: 292–297.Google Scholar

Bequaert, J. 1920 b. Hymenoptera collected near Boston, Mass., with description of a variety of Bombus affinis. Psyche, Camb. 27: 6–12.Google Scholar

Bequaert, J. 1932. An arboreal nest of Bombus fervidus (Fabricius). Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 27: 151.Google Scholar

Bequaert, J., and Plath, O. E.. 1925. Description of a new Psithyrus, with an account of Psithyrus laboriosus, and notes on bumble bees. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 67(6): 265–288, 2 figs.Google Scholar

Berland, L. 1958. Nouvel atlas d'entomologie. Hyménoptères de France. Edit. N. Boubée, Paris, Vol. 2, Portaiguillon (fin.), 184 pp.Google Scholar

Bernard, F. 1951. Super-famille des Apoidea ou abeille (pp. 1198–1257). In: Traité de zoologie. Anatomie, Systématique, biologie. Tome X (Fasc. II), Hyménoptèroides, etc., pp. 976–1948. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar

Bertoni, A. de W. 1911. Contribucion á la biologia de las avispas y abejas del Paraguay. An. Mus. nac. B. Aires 22 (ser. 3^a, t. 15): 97–146.Google Scholar

Bethune, C. J. S. 1878. Insects of the northern parts of British America (Family Bombidae, pp. 117–118). Can. Ent. 10: 116–118. [A reprinted serial of Kirby's Fauna Boreali-Americana: Insecta.]Google Scholar

Bethune, C. J. S. 1884. Insects of the northern parts of British America. From: Kirby's Fauna Boreali-Americana. Idem., Can. Ent. (1870–1882). 170 pp.Google Scholar

Betts, A. D. 1920 a. Nosema in bumble bees. Bee World 1: 171.Google Scholar

Betts, A. D. 1920 b. The constancy of the pollen-collecting bee. Bee World 2: 10–11.Google Scholar

Betts, A. D. 1935. The constancy of the pollen-collecting bee. Bee World 16: 111–113.Google Scholar

Bingefors, S., Eskilsson, L., and Friden, F.. 1960. Insektsförekomst och frösättning i fröodlingar; Mälar—Hjälmarområdet år 1959. Svensk Frötidn. 1: 11–15Google Scholar

Bingefors, S., Eskilsson, L., and Friden, F.. 1960. Insektsförekomst och frösättning i fröodlingar; Mälar—Hjälmarområdet år 1959. Svensk Frötidn. 2: 17–21.Google Scholar

Bingham, C. T. 1894. On new and little-known Hymenoptera from India, Burma and Ceylon. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 8 (Pt. 3): 358–389, 2 pls.Google Scholar

Bingham, C. T. 1896. New and little-known species of Indo-Malayan Hymenoptera, with a key to the genera of Indian Pompilidae, and a note on Sphex flava of Fabricius, and allied species. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc. 10 (Pt. 2): 195–216, 2 pls.Google Scholar

Bingham, C. T. 1897. The fauna of British India. Hymenoptera, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. Vol. 1, Wasps and bees, xxix + 579 pp., 4 pls.Google Scholar

Bingham, C. T. 1908. XXXII. Notes on aculeate Hymenoptera in the Indian Museum. Rec. Indian Mus. 2: 347–368 (1908–09).Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1923. In: Biologie der Tiere Deutschlands. Lief 8, Teil 42, Hymenoptera, II, p. 146. (Herausg., Dr. P. Schulz.)Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1927. Biologie der hymenopteren (Eine naturgeschichte der hautflügler), vii + 598 pp. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1930 a. Entomologische ergebnisse der Schwedischen Kamtschatka Expedition 1920–1922. 29 Bombinae (Hymen.). Ark. Zool. 21A(19): 1–6.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1930 b. [Bumblebees collected in the Alps.] In: Sitzungsberichte. Mitt. dt. ent. Ges., E. V., 1(8): 115–116.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1931. 4. Hymenoptera VII. Zur kenntnis einiger hummelnester aus dem Pamir. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl. 16 (h. 6): 860–864.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1935 a. Gedanken zu einem näturlichen system der bienen (Hym. Apid.). Dt. ent. Z. (1934), pp. 324–331.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1935 b. Genus Bombus (Apidae, Hymen.). Wissenschaftliche ergebnisse der Niederlandischen Expedition in den Karakorum und die angrenzenden gebiete in den jahren 1922, 1925 und 1929/30. Bd. 1: 255–256. Dr. Ph. C. Visser u. Jenny Visser-Hooft, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1936. Schwedisch-chinesische wissenschaftliche expedition nach den nordwestlichen provinzen Chinas. Hymen. 10, Bombinae. Ark. Zool. 27A(38): 1–27.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H. 1937. Hymenoptera Aculeata (excl. Formicidae und Halictinae) von den Kanarischen Iseln. Commentat. biol. (Helsingfors) 6(10): 1–3.Google Scholar

Bischoff, H., and Hedicke, H.. 1931. Ueber einige von Illiger beschriebene apiden (Hym.). S.B. Ges. naturf. Freunde, Berlin, Nrs. 8–10: 385–392 (1930).Google Scholar

Blanchard, E. 1840. Histoire naturelle des animaux articulés, etc. (Bombus, pp. 403–404). Vol. 3, 672 pp., 72 pls. Edited by Dumenil, P., Paris.Google Scholar

Blanchard, E. 1844. Description des collections. Insectes recueillis à l'Himalaya, par Victor Jacquemont. In: Voyage dans l'Inde, pendant les années 1828–1832, par Victor Jacquemont, 4: 13–31.Google Scholar

Blanchard, E. 1868. Métamorphoses V des insectes moeurs et instincts. 715 pp. Baillière, Paris.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1918. Psithyrus vestalis Geoffr. und bohemicus Seidl (distinctus Pérez) (Hym.). Ent. Mitt. 7: 188–197.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1919. Die bienenfauna Pommerns. Stettin. ent. Ztg 80: 65–131.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1920. Zu “Psithyrus vestalis Geoffr. und bohemicus Seidl (distinctus Pérez)” (Hym.). Ent. Mitt. 9: 43–44.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1925. Beiträge zur kenntnis der hymenopterenfauna des Saaletals. Stettin. ent. Ztg 85 (hfn. 1–2): 137–172.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1929. Beiträge zur kenntnis der hymenopterenfauna des Saaletals 1. Nachtrag. Stettin. ent. Ztg 90 (hfn. 1–2): 79–88.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1937. Beiträge zur kenntnis der hymenopterenfauna des Saaletals 2. Nachtrag. Stettin. ent. Ztg 98 (hf. 2): 232–239.Google Scholar

Blüthgen, P. 1942. Die beinenfauna Pommerns. Stettin. ent. Ztg 103: 81–91.Google Scholar

Boer, P. J. Den, and Vlengel, D. A.. 1949. Ethologische waarnemingen ann een nest van Bombus e. equestris (F.). Tijdschr. Ent. 91: 121–134 (1948).Google Scholar

Bohart, G. E. 1947. Wild bees in relation to alfalfa pollination. Fm Home Sci. 8(4): 13–14.Google Scholar

Bohart, G. E. 1957. Pollination of alfalfa and red clover. A. Rev. Ent. 2: 355–380.Google Scholar

Bohart, G. E., and Knowlton, G. F.. 1952. Yearly population fluctuation of Bombus morrisoni at Fredonia, Arizona. J. econ. Ent. 45: 890–891.Google Scholar

Boiko, A. K. 1948. [New type of myiasis in bumble bees.]Akad. nauk SSSR, Dok. 61: 423–424. (In Russian.)Google Scholar

Boiko, A. K. 1949. Senotainioz pchel. “Bolezni Pchel.”XXVII Sess., Vet. Sect., All-Union Lenin Agric. Acad. 168: 115–135. (In Russian.)Google Scholar

Bols, J. H. 1937. Observations on Bombus and Psithyrus, especially on their hibernation. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond., Ser. A, 12(4–6): 47–50, pl. 1.Google Scholar

Bordas, L. 1893 a. Sur l'appareil génital mâle des hyménoptères. C. r. Acad. Sci. 117: 746–748.Google Scholar

Bordas, L. 1893 b. Appareil génital mâle des hyménoptères de la tribu des Bombinae. C. r. Soc. Philom., No. 4, pp. 2–4.Google Scholar

Bordas, L. 1894. Appareil génital mâle des Bombinae. Bull. Soc. philomath. Paris (8) 6: 41–58.Google Scholar

Boulange, H. 1924. Recherches sur l'appareil copulateur des hyménoptères et spécialement des chalastrogastres. Mém., Trav. Facul. Cathol. Lille, Fasc. 28, 444 pp., pls. 1–3.Google Scholar

Bowles, G. J. 1879. Notes on the humble bees. [10th] Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. (Canada), pp. 31–33.Google Scholar

Bradley, A. E. 1922. Variation in the genus Psithyrus Lep. in the neighbourhood of Leeds. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 58: 141–142.Google Scholar

Bradley, J. C. 1921 (1920). Some features of the hymenopterous fauna of South America. Acta Soc. sci. Chile (Santiago) 30: 51–74.Google Scholar

Brauns, H. 1891. Aus der fauna Meklenburg's (Schluss). Ent. Nachr. 17(8): 119–125. (Re: Nest of Bombus cognatus Steph., and brief remarks on some other species, pp. 120–121.)Google Scholar

Brèthes, J. 1920. Insectes du Pérou. An. Soc. sci. argent. 89: 27–54.Google Scholar

Brèthes, J. 1926. Coleopteres et hymenopteres du Cuzco (Peru). Revta chil. Hist. nat. 29: 44–48.Google Scholar

Brian, A. D. 1951 a. The pollen collected by bumble-bees. J. Anim. Ecol. (Lond.) 20: 191–194.Google Scholar

Brian, A. D. 1951 b. Brood development in Bombus agrorum (Hym., Bombidae). Entomologist's mon. Mag. 87: 207–212.Google Scholar

Brian, A. D. 1952. Division of labour and foraging in Bombus agrorum Fabricius. J. Anim. Ecol. (Lond.) 21: 223–240, 1 fig.Google Scholar

Brian, A. D. 1954. The foraging of bumble bees. Bee World 35: 61–81.Google Scholar

Brian, A. D. 1957. Differences in the flowers visited by four species of bumble-bees and their causes. J. Anim. Ecol. (Lond.) 26: 71.Google Scholar

Brian, M. V., and Brian, A. D.. 1948. Regulation of oviposition in social Hymenoptera. Nature, Lond. 161: 854–856.Google Scholar

Brinck, P., and Wingstrand, K. G.. 1949. The mountain fauna of the Virihaure area in Swedish Lapland. I: General account. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Handl., N.F., 60(2): 70 pp., 25 figs.Google Scholar

Brinck, P., and Holgersen, H.. 1951. Hymenoptera Aculeata (pp. 60–68). In: Brinck, Wingstrand et. al., The mountain fauna of the Virihaure area in Swedish Lapland, II: Special account. K. fysiogr. Sällsk. Handl. 61(2): 173 pp., 13 figs.Google Scholar

Brischke, C. G. A. 1887. Hymenoptera Aculeata der provinzen West– und Ostpreussen. Neu-bearbeitet. Schr., naturf. Ges., Danzig 7 (h. 1): 85–107 (pp. 85–86).Google Scholar

Brittain, W. H., and Newton, D. E.. 1933. A study in the relative constancy of hive bees and wild bees in pollen gathering. Can. J. Res. 9: 334–349.Google Scholar

Britton, N. L. 1884. Dicentra punctured by humble-bees. Bull. Torrey bot. Club 11: 66–67.Google Scholar

Britton, W. E. 1920. Check-list of the insects of Connecticut. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 31, 307 pp.Google Scholar

Brodie, W., and White, J. E.. 1883 a. Check-list of the insects of the Dominion of Canada. Nat. Hist. Soc., Toronto, IV + 67 pp.Google Scholar

Brodie, W., and White, J. E.. 1883 b. Label list of the insects of the Dominion of Canada. Nat. Hist. Soc., Toronto 66 + 3 unnumb. pp.Google Scholar

Buckell, E. R. 1951. Records of bees from British Columbia; Bombidae. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 47: 7–24, 1 fig.Google Scholar

Bugnion, E. 1927. La biologie des bourdons. Riv. Sci. (Nice) 14: 1–33.Google Scholar

Bundy, W. E. 1876. Flowers of the golden currant perforated by humble-bees. Am. Nat. 10: 238.Google Scholar

Burck, W. 1891. Ueber das anbohren der blumenkrone durch bienen und hummeln. Annls Jard. bot. Buitenz. 10: 81–119.Google Scholar

Burgelhaus, F. H. 1901. Fertilization of the closed gentian by bumblebees. Plant World 4: 33.Google Scholar

Burks, B. D. 1951. Tribe Bombini (pp. 1247–1255). In: Muesebeck et al., Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. Synoptic catalog. Agriculture Monogr. 2: 1–1420. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington.Google Scholar

Burtt, B. D. 1923. The occurrence of Bombus cullumanus ♂ ♂ near Reading. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 59: 91–92.Google Scholar

Busnel, R. G., and Drilhon, A.. 1941. La riboflavine (vitamin B₂ dans la glande a venin des hymenopteres. C. r. Soc. biol. (Paris) 135: 1008–1009.Google Scholar

Buttel-Reepen, H. v. 1903 a. Die phylogenetische entstehung des bienenstaates, sowie mitteilungen zur biologie der solitären und sozialen apiden. Biol. Zbl. 23: 4–31, 89–108, 129–154, 183–195.Google Scholar

Buttel-Reepen, H. 1903 b. Die stammesgeschichtliche entstehung des bienenstaates, sowie beiträge zur lebensweise der solitären u. sozialen bienen (hummeln, meliponinen etc.). 138 pp. Thieme, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Buttel-Reepen, H. 1906. Apistica, beiträge zur systematik, biologie, sowie zur geschichtlichen und geographischen verbreitung der honigbiene (Apis mellifica L.), ihrer varietaten und der übrigen Apis-arten. Mitt. zool. Mus. Berl. 3(2):117–201.Google Scholar

Buttel-Reepen, H. 1907. Zur Psychobiologie der hummeln, I. Biol. Zbl. 27: 279–587, 604–613.Google Scholar

Buttel-Reepen, H. 1914. Dysteleologen in der natur. (Zur psychobiologie der hummeln, II.) Biol. Zbl. 34: 664–684.Google Scholar

Buttel-Reepen, H. 1915. Leben und wesen der bienen. xii + 300 pp., 1 table. Viehweg u. Sohn, Braunschweig.Google Scholar

Cameron, P. 1903. Descriptions of new species of Hymenoptera taken by Mr. Edward Whymper on the “Higher Andes of the Equator.” Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 29: 225–238.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. 1870. Queen humble-bee. Am. Ent., Bot. 2(10): 303.Google Scholar

Carl, G. C., Guiguet, C. J., and Hardy, G. A.. 1950. Biology of the Scott Island Group, Br. Columbia. Prov. Mus. nat. Hist., Br. Columb. 1950 Rep., pp. 21–63.Google Scholar

Cavro, E. 1950. Catalogue des hyménoptères du Département du Nord et régions limitrophes. I: Aculeates. Suppl., Bull. Soc. ent. N. Fr., No. 52, 86 pp.Google Scholar

Cederhjelm, J. 1798. Faunae Ingricae prodromus, etc. XVIII + 348 pp., 3 col. pls. Hartknoch, Lipsiae.Google Scholar

Chambers, V. H. 1949. The Hymenoptera Aculeata of Bedfordshire. Trans. Soc. Br. Ent. 9 (Pt. 4): 197–252.Google Scholar

Chandler, L. 1950. The Bombidae of Indiana. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 60: 167–177.Google Scholar

Chandler, L. 1954. Color variation in some common species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Bombidae). Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 63: 165–167 (1953).Google Scholar

Chandler, L. 1956. Parallel color variation in Bombus impatiens Cr. and Bombus bimaculatus Cr. (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 65: 116–117 (1955).Google Scholar

Chiu, S. C. 1948. Revisional notes on the Formosan bombidfauna (Hymenoptera). Notes Ent. chin. (Mus. Heude) (Shanghai) 12(7): 57–81, 4 figs.Google Scholar

Cholodkovsky, N. 1884. Ueber den hummelstachel und seine bedeutung für systematik. Zool. Anz. 7: 312–316.Google Scholar

Christ, J. L. 1791. Naturgeschichte, klassification, und nomenclatur der insekten vom bienen, wespen, und ameisengeschlecht. 576 pp., 60 pls. (col.).Google Scholar

Christy, R. M. 1883. On the methodic habits of insects when visiting flowers. J. Linn. Soc. (zool.) 17: 186–194.Google Scholar

Church, N. S. 1960 a. Heat loss and the body temperatures of flying insects. I: Heat loss by evaporation of water from the body. J. exp. Biol. 37(1): 171–185, pl. 2.Google Scholar

Church, N. S. 1960 b. Heat loss and the body temperatures of flying insects. II: Heat conduction within the body and its loss by radiation and convection. J. exp. Biol. 37(1): 186–212, pl. 3.Google Scholar

Claude-Joseph, F. 1926. Recherches biologiques sur les hyménoptères du Chile (Mellifères). Annls Sci. nat., Zool., Ser. 10, 9: 113–268.Google Scholar

Clements, F. E., and Long, F. L.. 1923. Experimental pollination. An outline of the ecology of flowers and insects. Carneg. Instn., vii + 274 pp., 17 pls. Washington.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1890. Notes on the insect fauna of high altitudes in Custer County, Colorado. Can. Ent. 22: 37–39.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1898 a. Tables for the determination of New Mexico bees. Bull. Univ. N. Mex. 1(1): 1–71.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1898 b. Notes on bees taken at Albuquerque, New Mexico, in September, 1897. Bull. Univ. N. Mex. 1(1): 72–73.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1898 c. XXXVII–New North-American insects. Including: “IV–A new humble bee from the Pribilof Islands,” (pp. 324–326). Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser 7, 2: 321–331.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1899 a. Catálogo de las abejas de Mexico. Biblio. Agric., Secret. de Fomento, Mexico, 20 pp.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1899 b. Notes on American bees. Entomologist 32: 154–159.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1899 c. The bees of Kansas. Ent. News 10: 3–4.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1900. Observations on bees collected at Las Vegas, New Mexico, and in adjacent mountains. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 7, 5: 401–416.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1901. In: Some insects of the Hudsonian zone in New Mexico. III: Hymenoptera, Apoidea. Psyche, Camb. 9: 163–164.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1902 a. Hymenoptera of southern California, I. Bull. Sth. Calif. Acad. Sci. 1(6): 70.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1902 b. Flowers and insects in New Mexico. Am. Nat. 36(430): 809–817.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1903 a. A catalogue of the bees of California. Psyche, Camb. 12: 74–78.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1903 b. Footnote to W. P. Cockerell, Trip to Truchas Peaks. Am. Nat. 37: 887–891 (p. 891). (q.v.)Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1904 a. Some bees from San Miguel County, New Mexico. Entomologist 37: 5–9.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1904 b. The bees of southern California, V. Bull. Sth. Calif. Acad. Sci. 3(6): 86–90.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905 a. New bees from Colorado. Ent. News 16: 270–272.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905 b. Descriptions and records of bees, I. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 7, 16: 216–225.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905 c. Descriptions and records of bees, III. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser 7, 16: 301–308.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905 d. Descriptions and records of bees, IV. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser 7, 16: 392–403.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1905 e. Tables for the separation of some bees of the genera Coelioxys and Colletes. Psyche, Camb. 12: 85–90.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1906 a. New Rocky Mountain bees, and other notes. Can. Ent. 38: 160–166.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1906 b. The bees of New Mexico. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 32: 289–314.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1906 c. The bees of Florissant, Colorado. (Art. XXV). Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 22: 419–455.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1906 d. Fossil Hymenoptera from Florissant, Colorado. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 50(2): 33–58.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1906 e. Descriptions and records of bees, XII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser 7, 18: 69–75.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1907 a. New American bees, IV. Entomologist 40(528): 97–100.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1907 b. The bees of Boulder County, Colorado. Univ. Colo. Stud. 4: 239–259.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1908 a. Descriptions and records of bees, XIX. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser 8, 1: 337–344.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1908 b. Descriptions and records of bees, XX. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser 8, 2: 323–334.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909 a. Two new bees. Can. Ent. 41: 35–37.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909 b. Some European fossil bees. Entomologist 42: 313–317.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909 c. Descriptions of Hymenoptera from Baltic amber. (In: Mitt. geol.-palaeont. Inst., Univ. Königs.) Schr. phys.-ökon. Ges. Königsb. (Jb.) 50 (h. 1): 1–20.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909 d. Some additional bees from Prussian amber. Schr. phys.-ökon. Ges. Königsb. (Jb.) 50 (h. 1): 21–25.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1909 e. Descriptions and records of bees, XXIII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser 8, 4: 393–404.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 a. Descriptions and records of bees. XXVIII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser. 8, 5: 409–419.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 b. Descriptions and records of bees XXIX. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser. 8. 5: 496–506.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 c. Some bees from Eldora, Colorado. Psyche, Camb. 17(6): 244–247.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 d. Some bees from high altitudes in the Himalaya Mountains. Entomologist 43: 238–242.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 e. An introduction to the study of Rocky Mountain bees. Univ. Colo. Stud. 7(3): 179–187, 50 figs.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 f. The bee fauna of Calgary, Alberta. Can. Ent. 42: 25.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1910 g. Some insects collected in northern Colorado in 1909. Univ. Colo. Stud. 7: 126–130.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1911 a. The humble bees of Formosa. Entomologist 44: 100–102.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1911 b. Bees from the Himalaya Mountains. Entomologist 44: 176–177.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1911 c. Bees in the collection of the United States National Museum, I. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 39: 635–658.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1912 a. New bees from Brazil. Psyche, Camb. 19:41–61.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1912 b. Some bees from Guatemala. Psyche, Camb. 19: 105–106.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1912 c. Descriptions and records of bees, XLV. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 8, 10: 21–31.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1912 d. Collecting bees at Gualan, Guatemala. Can. Ent. 44: 277–282.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1912 e. Descriptions and records of bees, XLVII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 8, 10: 484–494.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1912 f. Animals and plants described as new from Colorado in 1911. Univ. Colo. Stud. 9(2–3): 75–89.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1913 a. Descriptions and records of bees. L. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 8, 11: 273–283.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1913 b. Descriptions and records of bees. LIII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser 8, 12: 103–110.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1913 c. Remarks on fossil insects. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 15(3): 123–126.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1914. Bees from Ecuador and Peru. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 22: 306–328.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1915 a. Notes on orchids. Bot. Gaz. 59(4): 331–333.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1915 b. Animals and plants described as new from Colorado in 1912, 1913 and 1915. Univ. Colo. Stud. 11(4): 213–251.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1915 c. Notes on some bees from Virginia. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 17(1): 3–5.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1915 d. Descriptions and records of bees, LXVII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 8, 15: 529–537.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1915 e. Descriptions and records of bees. LXX. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. Ser. 8, 16: 482–489.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1916. Bees from the northern peninsula of Michigan. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. Occ. Pap. 23, 10 pp.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1917 a. Two new humble-bees from China. Entomologist 50: 265–266.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1917 b. New social bees. Psyche, Camb. 24(4): 120–128.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1918. Bees from British Guiana. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 38: 685–690.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1919 a. The social bees of the Philippine Islands. Philipp. J. Sci. 14(1): 77–81.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1919 b. The bees of the Rocky Mountain National Park (Hymenop.). Ent. News 30: 286–294.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1919 c. The bees of Gold Hill, Colorado. Can. Ent. 51(12): 271–273.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1919 d. The bees of Peaceful Valley, Colorado. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 27(4): 298–300.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1919 e. Descriptions and records of bees, LXXXVII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 9, 4: 355–360.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1920. Supplementary notes on the social bees of the Philippine Islands. Philipp. J. Sci. 16(6): 631–632.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1921. Descriptions and records of bees, XCI. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 9, 8: 359–368.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1922. Bees in the collection of the U.S. National Museum. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 60(2413): 1–20.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1923. A bee-collecting trip across the plains (Hym.: Apoidea, Sphecoidea). Ent. News 34: 45–50.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1924. A bee collecting trip to Chimney Rock, Wyoming. Ent. News 35: 347–351.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1925. Some bees from the Pyrenees. Entomologist 58: 157–160.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1928. Bees collected in Siberia in 1927. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 1: 345–361.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1929 a. Descriptions and records of bees, CXIV. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 3: 195–204.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1929 b. Descriptions and records of bees CXVIII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 4: 142–152.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1929 c. Some results of a journey to Kaieteur Falls, British Guiana. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 4: 439–444.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1930 a. The bees of Australia. Aust. Zool. 6(2): 137–156 (cont'd.).Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1930 b. Bees from Mesa Verde, Colorado, in the American Museum of Natural History. Am. Mus. Novit., No. 397, 8 pp.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1930 c. Descriptions and records of bees, CXXII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 5: 156–163.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1930 d. Descriptions and records of bees CXXIII. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 5: 405–411.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1931 a. II: Insects from the Miocene (Latah) of Washington. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 24: 307–312, pl. 1.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1931 b. Bees obtained by Professor Claude R. Kellog in the Foochow district, China, with new records of Philippine Bombidae. Am. Mus. Novit., No. 480, 7 pp.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1931 c. Descriptions and records of bees, CXXVI. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 10, 7: 273–280.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1933. Bees collected by Mrs. Maurice T. James in Pingree Park, Colorado. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 26(1): 40–44.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1936 a. Bees from northern California. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 12: 133–164.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1936 b. The entomology of Prince Albert National Park, Saskatchewan. Can. Ent. 68: 85–88.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1937. Bees from San Miguel Island, California. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 13: 148–157.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1938 a. Bees from Prince Albert Park, Saskatchewan. Am. Mus. Novit., No. 983, pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1938 b. Bees collected on the California islands in the spring of 1938. Trans. San Diego Soc. nat. Hist. 9(9): 37–38.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1939. Life and habits of bumblebees. Scient. Mon. (December) 49: 554–557.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1949. Bees from Central America, principally Honduras. Proc. U.S. nat. Mus. 98(3233): 429–490.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A., and McNary, J.. 1902. Notes on the mouthparts of Bombus. Can. Ent. 34: 71–72.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A., and Porter, W.. 1899 a. Contributions from the New Mexico Biological Station. VIII: The New Mexico bees of the genus Bombus. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 7, 4: 386–393.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A. 1899 b. Contributions from the New Mexico Biological Station. VII: Observations on bees, with descriptions of new genera and species. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 7, 4: 403–421.Google Scholar

Cockerell, T. D. A., et al. 1901. Some insects of the Hudsonian Zone in New Mexico, III. Psyche, Camb. 9: 163–164.Google Scholar

Cockerell, W. P. 1903 a. The red-tailed bumble-bee's nest. Birds and Nature 13: 17–18.Google Scholar

Cockerell, W. P. 1903 b. A trip to the Truchas Peaks, New Mexico. Am. Nat. 37: 887–891.Google Scholar

Cockerell, W. P. 1917. Collecting bees in southern Texas. Jl N.Y. ent. Soc. 25(3): 187–193.Google Scholar

Cockle, J. W. 1913. Strange action of Bombus occidentalis. Can. Ent. 45: 347–348.Google Scholar

Comba, M. 1960. Contributo alla conoscenza dei Bombus Latr. e Psithyrus Lep. delle Valli del Pellice, Angrona, Germanasca (Alpi Cozie) (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Fragm. ent. (Inst. Naz. Ent.), 3 (fasc. 8): 163–201.Google Scholar

Coville, F. V. 1889. Note. In: Proceedings, Entomological Society, Washington. Insect Life 1: 295.Google Scholar

Coville, F. V. 1890. Notes on bumble-bees. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 1: 197–203.Google Scholar

Craig, C. H. 1953. Psithyrus insularis (Sm.) in a nest of Bombus ternarius Say (Hymenoptera: Bombidae). Can. Ent. 85: 311–312.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. C. 1906. Some Costa Rican bees. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 32: 157–163.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. C., and Swenk, M.. 1903. A new Bombus from Costa Rica. Can. Ent. 35: 268.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1863 a. List of the North American species of Bombus and Apathus. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 2: 83–116.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1863 b. In: Written communications. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 2: 164–166.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1864. Descriptions of several new species of North American Apidae. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 3: 38–43.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1872. Hymenoptera Texana. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 4: 153–292.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1874. Descriptions of new Hymenoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 5: 99–102.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1875. Report upon the collections of Hymenoptera made in portions of Nevada, Utah, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona, during the years 1872, 1873 and 1874. In: Rep. U.S. Geograph. Explor. & Surv. (Wheeler), 100th Merid., Zool-Insects, Vol. 5, pp. 707–728, pls. xxxiii, xxxiv.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1876. List of Hymenoptera collected by J. Duncan Putnam, of Davenport, Iowa, with descriptions of two new species. Proc. Davenport Acad. nat. Sci. 1: 206–211, pl. xxxv.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1878. Descriptions of new species of North American bees. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., pp. 181–221.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1879 a. Catalogue of North American Apidae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 7: 215–232.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1879 b. Hymenoptera (p. 159). In: Kumlien et al., Contributions to the natural history of Arctic America, the Howgate Polar Expedition, 1877–78. U.S. nat. Mus. Bull. 15, 179 pp. (Smithson. misc. Collns 23 (Art. 5): 1–179.)Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1879 c. Descriptions of new North American Hymenoptera in the collection of the American Entomological Society. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 7: 201–214.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1887. Synopsis of the families and genera of Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico. Trans. Am. ent. Soc., Suppl. vol., vi + 350 pp.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. 1916. The Cresson types of Hymenoptera. Mem. Am. ent. Soc. 1, 1–141.Google Scholar

Cresson, E. T. Jr., 1928. The types of Hymenoptera in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia other than those of Ezra T. Cresson. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 5: 1–90.Google Scholar

Criddle, N., et al. 1924. The entomological record, 1923. 54th Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. (Canada), pp. 87–102 (1923).Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1949 a. Humble-bee parasites and commensals found within a thirty mile radius of London. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 24 (Pts. 10–12): 119–127.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1949 b. The biology of humble-bees (Bombus), with special reference to the production of the worker caste. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 100(1): 1–45.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1949 c. Larval specific characters and instars of English Bombidae. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 24: 14–19, 6 figs.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1949 d. An overwintering nest of the humble-bee Bombus terrestris (L.) (Hymenoptera, Apidae). N.Z. Sci. Rev. 7: 96–97.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1953 a. Life cycle of the humble bee. N.Z. Sci. Rev. 11: 92–98.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1953 b. Some aspects of the biology and ecology of humble-bees upon the yields of red clover seed in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Bull. 34, pp. 227–240, 1 fig.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1954. The life-cycle of humble-bees in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. Bull. 36, pp. 95–107.Google Scholar

Cumber, R. A. 1959. The insect complex of sown pastures in the North Island. V. The Hymenoptera as revealed by summer sweep-sampling. N.Z. J. Agric. Res. 2(5): 874–897.Google Scholar

Curtis, J. 1833. British entomology. Vol. 10, pp. 434–481a and accomp. pls. (pl. 468).Google Scholar

Curtis, J. 1835 a. Insects. Descriptions, etc. of the insects brought home by Commander James Clark Ross (pp. lix-lxxx, 1 pl.). In: Appendix to the narrative of a second voyage in search of a north-west passage, etc., by Sir John Ross, London, 1835.Google Scholar

Curtis, J. 1835 b. British entomology. Vol. 12, pp. 530–577 and accomp. pls. (pl. 564).Google Scholar

Curtis, J., Haliday, A. H., and Walker, F.. 1836. XV: Descriptions, etc. of the insects collected by Captain P. P. King, R. N., F. R. S., in the survey of the Straits of Magellan. Trans. Linn. Soc., Lond. 17 (Pt. 3): 315–359.Google Scholar

Dahlbom, A. G. 1832. Bombi Scandinaviae monographice tractato et iconibus illustrati. 55 pp., 1 pl. (37 figs.), Londini Gothorum.Google Scholar

Dahlbom, A. G. 1839–1840. Synopsis hymenopterologiae Scandinavicae. 104 pp., 1 tab., 5 pls., Berling, Lund.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. v. 1878. Beitrag zur kenntnis der hymenopterenfauna Tirols. Naturw. Abh., Innsbruck 2: 259–278.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1880. Unsere hummel- (Bombus) arten. Der Naturhist. 2(4): 30Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1880. Unsere hummel- (Bombus) arten. Der Naturhist. 2(5): 40–41.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1882. Bemerkungen zur gattung Bombus Latr., II. Ber. naturw.-med. Ver., Innsbruck 12: 14–31.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1885. Zur biologie von Bombus Gerstaeckeri Mor. (B. opulentus Gerst.). Zool. Anz. 8: 691–693.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1886. Heterotrophie. Ein beitrag zur insektenbiologie. Kosmos 18: 12–19.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1890. Hymenopterologische notizen. Wien. ent. Ztg 9: 139.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. 1896. Catalogus Hymenopterorum. X, Apidae. viii + 643 pp. Lipsiae.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. v., and Friese, H.. 1894. Synonymischer katalog der Europäischen schmarotzerbienen. Ent. Nachr. 20(3): 33–43.Google Scholar

Dalla Torre, K. W. C. G. v., and Friese, H.. 1895. Synonymischer katalog der Europäischen sammelbiene. Ent. Nachr. 21: 21–26, 37–50, 53–62, 69–80.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1841. Humble-bees. Gdnrs' Chron., p. 550.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1876. The effects of cross and self fertilisation in the vegetable kingdom. viii + 482 pp. Murray, London.Google Scholar

Davidson, A. 1894. On the parasites of wild bees in California. Ent. News 5: 170–172.Google Scholar

Davidson, A. 1911. The bumble bees of Los Angeles. Bull. Sth. Calif. Acad. Sci. 10: 66.Google Scholar

De Geer, C. 1773. Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire des insectes. Vol. 3, viii + 696 pp., 44 pls. Hesselberg, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Delmas, R. 1962. Notes zoogéographiques et systématiques sur les Bombidae. 1: La Bombus bradmannicus Vogt des Alpes Français. Annls Abeille 5(3): 175–179.Google Scholar

Dias, D. 1953. The alimentary canal of Bombus (Hymenoptera: Bombidae). 51 pp., 45 figs., unpubl. M. S. Thesis, Cornell Univ.Google Scholar

Dias, D. 1957. Comparative notes on the ventral nerve cord of certain Apinae bees. Rev. Agric. 32(4): 279–289.Google Scholar

Dias, D. 1958 a. Contribuiçao para o conhecimento da bionomia de Bombus incarum Franklin da Amazônia (Hymenóptera: Bombidae). Revta bras. Ent. 8: 1–20, 10 pls.Google Scholar

Dias, D. 1958 b. Abnormal segmentation in “Bombus” affecting abdominal sternites, musculature and nerve cord (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). Revta bras. Biol. 18(4): 391–396.Google Scholar

Dias, D. 1960 a. Nota sobre um ninho de Bombus construido acima do Chao (Hymenopteraò, Apoidea). Revta bras. Ent. 9: 151–156.Google Scholar

Dias, D. 1960 b. Procedures for handling preserved bumblebee specimens for population studies. Turtox News 38(10): 252–255.Google Scholar

Didden, C. H. 1948. Merkwaardige behuizing van Bombus agrorum F. Ent. Ber., Amst. 12: 208–209.Google Scholar

Dimmock, G. 1886. Sphaerularia in America. Am. Nat. 20: 73–75.Google Scholar

Dittrich, R. 1886. Verzeichnis der in Schlesien bisher beobachteten Bombus-arten. Z. Ent., N.F., Hft. 11, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

Dittrich, R. 1903. Verzeichnis der bisher in Schlesien aufgefundenen Hymenoptera. 1, Apidae. Z. Ent. N.F., Hft. 28, pp. 21–54.Google Scholar

Doflein, F. 1921. Mazedonien. Erlebnisse und beobachtungen eines naturforchers im gefolge des Deutschen Heeres. VIII + 592 pp., 279 figs., 4 col. pls., 12 tabs. Fischer, Jena. (pp. 230, 372–374, 378, 588, 590).Google Scholar

Donisthorpe, H. 1920. The phoresy of Antherophagus. Entomologist's Rec. 32(10): 181–187.Google Scholar

Dover, C. 1922. A note on bees of the genera Xylocopa and Bombus in the Indian Museum. Rec. Indian Mus. 24 (Pt. 1): 88–89.Google Scholar

Dozier, H. L. 1920. An ecological study of hammock and piney woods insects in Florida. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 13: 325–380.Google Scholar

Drenowski, A. K., Drenovsky, A. K. 1934. Beitrag zur insektenfauna von Bulgarien und Mazedonien. Mitt. bulg. ent. Ges., Sofia 8: 174–182. (pp. 176–178.)Google Scholar

Drewsen, C. 1838. Bomborum psithyrorumque Daniae enumeratio critica. 8 pp., 1 pl., Havniae. (Separate of Drewsen and Schiødte, 1838.)Google Scholar

Drewsen, C., and Schiødte, J.. 1838. Fortegnelse over de Danske arter of slaegferne Bombus og Psithyrus. Kröyer's Naturh. Tidsskr. 2 (h. 2): 105–126, 1 pl. (Extract: Verzeichniss der Dänischen arten der gattungen Bombus und Psithyrus; von Chr. Drewsen und J. Schiödte. Isis, H. 5, cols. 325–331, 1841.)Google Scholar

Ducke, A. 1898. Die bienenfauna Österreichisch Schlesiens. Ent. Nachr. 24(9): 129–145.Google Scholar

Ducke, A. 1901. Beobachtungen über blütenbesuch, erscheinungszeit etc. der bei Para vorkommenden bienen. Z. syst. Hym. Dipt., H. 1, pp. 25–32Google Scholar

Ducke, A. 1901. Beobachtungen über blütenbesuch, erscheinungszeit etc. der bei Para vorkommenden bienen. Z. syst. Hym. Dipt., H. 2, pp. 49–67.Google Scholar

Ducke, A. 1902. Beobachtungen über blütenbesuch, erscheinungszeit etc. der bei Para vorkommenden bienen. Allg. Z. Ent. 7: 321–326, 360–368, 400–405, 417–422. (pp. 325, 418.)Google Scholar

Ducke, A. 1910. Contribution à la connaissance de la faune hyménoptèrologique du Nord-Est du Brésil. Ill. Rev. Ent., Caen 28(3): 78–96, 97–122.Google Scholar

Ducke, A. 1912. Die natürlichen bienengenera Südamerikas. Zool. Jb., abt. syst. 34: 51–116.Google Scholar

Dufour, L. J. M.. (1836) 1837. Recherches sur quelques entozoaires et larves parasites des insectes orthoptères et hyménoptères. Ann. Sci. Nat. 7 (2 ser.): 5–20, pl. 1, A–figs. 1–16, B–1, 2, 2′ and 2″.Google Scholar

Dumbleton, L. J. 1949. Bumble-bee species (Bombus spp.) in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 29: 308–312, 1 fig., (1948).Google Scholar

Duncan, J. 1840. The natural history of bees. In: Jardine, Naturalist's Library, Ent., Vol. 6: viii + pp. 17–301, 30 pls. Lizars, Edinburgh; Highly, and Curry, jun., London.Google Scholar

Dunning, J. W. 1884. (Note on the early importation of humble-bees into New Zealand.)Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., p. iii (Proceedings).Google Scholar

Dunning, J. W. 1886. (“The importation of humble-bees into New Zealand”.)Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond., pp. xxxii–xxxiv (Proceedings).Google Scholar

Dusmet y Alonso, J. M. 1948–1949. Los ápidos de Espaná, V. Mem. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. nat., Madrid, Tomo extraord. 1921, pp. 177–212.Google Scholar

Dutilly, A. 1946. A list of insects of the Mackenzie River Basin. Can. Fld Nat. 60(2): 35–44.Google Scholar

Dylewska, M. 1957. The distribution of the species of genus Bombus Latr. in Poland (an outline). Acta zool. cracov. 2(12): 259–278.Google Scholar

Dylewska, M. 1958. The Bombus Latr. and Psithyrus Lep. fauna of the Polish part of the Tatry Mountains. Acta zool. cracov. 3(5): 138–197.Google Scholar

Eidmann, M. 1935. Zur kenntnis der insektenfauna Südlabrador. 4: Beitrag zur kenntnis der fauna von Südlabrador, insbesondere des flussgebietes des Matamek River. Arb. morph. taxon. Ent. Berl. 2(2): 81–105.Google Scholar

Ekstam, O. 1894. Zur kenntnis der blütenbestäubung auf Novaja Semlja. Öfvers. K. VetenskAkad. Förh. 2: 79–84.Google Scholar

Ekstam, O. 1897. Einige blütenbiologische beobachtungen. Tromsø Mus. Årsh. 18: 109–198 (1895).Google Scholar

Elfving, R. 1958. Apidologiska meddelanden. Notul. Ent. 38(3): 90.Google Scholar

Elfving, R. 1960 a. Die hummeln und schmarotzerhummeln Finnlands. Fauna fenn. 10: 1–43.Google Scholar

Elfving, R. 1960 b. Suomen kimalaiset. Luonnon Tutk. 64: 143–149.Google Scholar

Elfving, R. 1964. Tärkeimmät kimalaisemme ja niiden määrittäminen. (The most important bumblebee species in Finland and their identification.)Maatalous Koetoim. (Helsinki) 18: 283–291. (In Finnish with summaries in German and English.)Google Scholar

Emeis, W. 1935. Die hummelarten Schleswig-Holsteins. “Heimat” (Feb.), pp. 69–74.Google Scholar

Emeis, W. 1941. Ueber einige seltenere hummeln und kuckuckshummeln Schleswig-Holsteins. S. B. Ges. naturf. Freunde, Berlin, Jahrg. 1940, pp. 288–293.Google Scholar

Erichson, W. F. 1851. Hymenoptera, pp. 60–65. In: Middendorff, Reise in den Äussersten Norden und Osten Sibiriens 2(1), 516 pp., 32 pls.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. V. 1908. Sur la psychologie des bourdons. Rev. russ. Ent. 8(1): 32–41.Google Scholar

Erlandsson, S. 1948. Bombus solstitialis Panzer (Hym.) en bortglömd art i vår fauna. Ent. Tidskr. 69(1–2): 106–112.Google Scholar

Erlandsson, S. 1950. Bombus soroeënsis Fabr. (Hym.) en mindra känd art: vår fauna. Ent. Tidskr. 71: 20–26, 2 figs.Google Scholar

Erlandsson, S. 1953. Bombus agrorum F. ssp. gotlandicus n. ssp. (Hym.). Ent. Tidskr. 74: 76–80, 1 fig.Google Scholar

Erlandsson, S. 1960. Notes on Hymenoptera. Ent. Tidskr. 81(3–4): 123–130.Google Scholar

Erlandsson, S. 1963. Notes on Hymenoptera. 2: Contribution to the knowledge of the aculeate Hymenoptera in the Island of Bornholm. Ent. Tidskr. 84(1–2): 65–68.Google Scholar

Esaki, T., et al. 1932. Iconographia insectorum Japonicorum. 2241 pp. + 15 pp. (taxonomic arrangement), + 123 pp. (Japanese index), + 97 pp. (English index) and 24 plates. Hokuryukan, Tokyo.Google Scholar

Etcheverry, M., and Valenzuela, A.. 1960. Investigaciones biológicas sobre himenópteros de Chile, (Meliferos) de Claude Joseph. Publ. Fac. Filos. Educ., No. 1, 60 pp., 18 pls.Google Scholar

Etzel, A. 1859. (See under Schiødte, J. C., 1857.)Google Scholar

Evans, J. D. 1896. List of Hymenoptera taken at Sudbury, Ont. Can. Ent. 28: 9–13.Google Scholar

Evans, W. 1901. The pale variety of Bombus smithianus, White, in Scotland. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 37: 47.Google Scholar

Eversmann, E. 1846. Hymenopterorum Rossicorum species novae vel parum cognitae, descriptae et partim depictae. Bull. Soc. imp. Nat., Moscou 19(1): 436–443, Tab. IV, V (col.).Google Scholar

Eversmann, E. 1852. Hymenopterorum Volgo-Uralensis. Fam. Anthophilarum seu apidarum. Bull. Soc. Nat., Moscou 3: 1–137.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Systema entomologiae, etc. 28 unnumb. pp. (Prolegomena, etc.) + 832 pp. Flensburgi et Lipsiae.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1776. Genera insectorum, etc. Prolegomena (12 unnumb. pp) + 310 pp. Bartschii, Chilonii.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1781. Species insectorum, etc. 1: viii + 552 pp. Ernest, Bohnii, Hamburgi et Kilonii.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1787. Mantissa insectorum, etc. 1: xx + 348 pp. Proft, Hafniae.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1793. Entomologia systematica. 2: viii + 519 pp. Proft, Hafniae.Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1798. Supplementum entomologiae systematicae. 2 unnumb. + 572 pp. Proft et Storch, Hafniae. (Index alphabeticus, 52 pp. + Emendanda, 1 p., 1799.)Google Scholar

Fabricius, J. C. 1805. Systema piezatorum. xiv, pp. 15–440 and index, pp. 1–30. Brunsvigae.Google Scholar

Fabricius, O. 1780. Fauna Groenlandica, etc. xvi + 452 pp., 1 pl. (with 12 figs.). Rothe, Hafniae and Lipsiae.Google Scholar

Faester, K. 1959. In Dänemark getroffene arten von Bombus und Psithyrus (Hym., Apidae). Ent. Meddr. 29: 152–153.Google Scholar

Fahringer, J., and Friese, H.. 1921. Eine hymenopteren-ausbeute aus dem Amanusgebirge. (Kleinasien und Nord-Syrien, südl. Armenien.) Arch. Naturgesch. 87 (A, 3): 150–180.Google Scholar

Fairchild, D., and Barrett, O. W.. 1906. Notes on the copulation of Bombus fervidus. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 8: 13–14, 1 pl.Google Scholar

Fantham, H. B., and Porter, A.. 1914. The morphology, biology and economic importance of Nosema bombi n. sp., parasitic in various humble-bees (Bombus spp.). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 8: 623–638.Google Scholar

Fattig, P. W. 1923. The bumblebees of Florida. Fla Ent. 7: 25.Google Scholar

Fattig, P. W. 1933. Food of the robber fly, Mallophora orcina (Wied.) (Diptera). Can. Ent. 65: 119–120.Google Scholar

Ferton, C. 1901. Notes détachées sur l'instinct des hyménoptères mellifères et ravisseurs avec la description de quelques espèces. Ann Soc. ent., Fr. 70: 83–148, 3 pls.Google Scholar

Flamary, A. 1898. Contribution au catalogue des hyménoptères du Maconnais. L'Ech., Rev. Linn. (Lyon) 14(163): 61–63.Google Scholar

Flemming, S. 1926. Ein auffalender nestbefund bei hummeln. Zool. Jb., abt. syst. 52: 395–406.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J., and Gibson, A.. 1908. Entomological Record, 1907. 38th Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. (Canada), pp. 113–133.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J., and Gibson, A.. 1909. Entomological Record, 1908. 39th Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. (Canada), pp. 99–116.Google Scholar

[Fletcher, J. J.] 1896. In: Notes and exhibits. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 10 (s. 2): 537.Google Scholar

Focke, W. O. 1880. Tabak und hummeln. Kosmos 6: 473–474.Google Scholar

Focke, W. O. 1883. Der rothe klee in Neuseeland. Ibid. 13: 687–688.Google Scholar

Forbes, W. A. 1874. Bombus lucorum. Entomologist 7: 231.Google Scholar

Forsius, R. 1925. Ueber Bombus smithianus Wh. Medd. Soc. fauna fl. fenn. 49: 9–11, 1 map (1922–1923).Google Scholar

Forsius, R., and Nordström, A.. 1921. Verzeichnis der aus Finnland bisher bekannten apiden. Notul. ent. 1: 70–76.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. 1902. The long-tongued bees (Apidae) of California. Rep. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn 1899–1901, Pt. 2, pp. 316–330.Google Scholar

Fox, W. J. 1892. Report on the Hymenoptera collected in West Greenland. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad., pp. 133–135.Google Scholar

Fox, W. J. 1893. Report on some Mexican Hymenoptera, principally from Lower California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 4(2): 1–25.Google Scholar

Fox, W. J. 1895. Third report on some Mexican Hymenoptera, principally from Lower California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 5(2): 260–272, pl. 21.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1907. Notes on Bombinae, with descriptions of new species. Ent. News 18: 90–93.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1911. New North American Bombidae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 37: 157–168.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1912. The Bombidae of the New World. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 38: 177–486.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1913. The Bombidae of the New World. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 39: 73–200, pls. 1–22.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1915. Notes on Bombidae, with descriptions of new forms (Hym.). Ent. News 26: 409–417.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1950. Cranberry insects in Massachusetts. Mass. agric. Exp. Stn Bull. 445 (Pts. II–VII), 88 pp.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1954. The evolution and distribution of American bumblebee kinds. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 80: 43–51.Google Scholar

Franklin, H. J. 1955. Measurements of some parts of some male bumblebees (Hym.). Ent. News 66: 65–68.Google Scholar

Fraser, F. C. 1947. Bombus jonellus (Kby.) (Hym.) nesting in a discarded bird's nest. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 83: 280.Google Scholar

Free, J. B. 1955 a. Queen production in colonies of bumblebees. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 30(A) 1–3: 19–25.Google Scholar

Free, J. B. 1955 b. The adaptability of bumblebees to a change in the location of their nest. Brit. J. anim. Behav. (Lond.) 3: 61–65.Google Scholar

Free, J. B. 1955 c. The behavior of egg-laying workers of bumblebee colonies. Brit. J. anim. Behav. 3: 147–153.Google Scholar

Free, J. B. 1955 d. The division of labour within bumblebee colonies. Insectes soc. 2: 195–212.Google Scholar

Free, J. B. 1955 e. The collection of food by bumblebees. Insectes soc. 2: 303–311.Google Scholar

Free, J. B. 1957. The effect of social facilitation on the ovary development of bumblebee workers. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 32: 182–184.Google Scholar

Free, J. B., and Butler, C. G.. 1959. Bumblebees. Appendices 3 (pp. 173–184) and 4 (pp. 185–189) by Yarrow. xiv + 208 pp., 46 phot. Macmillan, New York; Collins, London. (Krombein 1959, q.v.)Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1889. Une chasse au Bombus alpinus Lin., I–VIII. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 4: 17–18, 26, 31–32, 42, 49–50, 55–56, 63–65, 71–72.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1890 a. Une nouvelle chasse au Bombus alpinus Linn. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 4: 152–153, 162, 183–184, 193; 5: 2–3, 10–11, 18–19.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1890 b. Supplément aux chasses au Bombus alpinus Lin. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 5: 75–76, 81, 92–93.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1890 c. Bombus agrorum Fab. und B. variabilis Schmdk. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 8: 183–187.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1890 d. Die weissen alpenhummeln. Bombus mucidus Gerst., var. mollis Péréz und B. pomorum Pz. var. elegans Seidl (mesomelas Gerst.). Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 8: 187–190.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1890 e. Bombus alticola Krchb., rajellus Kirby und pyrenaeus Péréz. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 8: 190–194.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1892. Les bourdons du Valaia. Bull. Soc. Murith. 13: 32–36.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1898. Ueber die erkennungszeichen der hochalpinen dreifarbigen hummelarbeiter alticola, derhamellus var. 3, mendax und lapponicus. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 10: 127–132.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1898–1912. Fauna insectorum Helvetiae. Hymenoptera, Apidae. Volume 1: Gesellig lebende bienen, urbienen und schenkelsammler. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 10: 1–52 (1898), 53–84 (1899), 85–148 (1900), 149–180 (1903); 11: 181–212 (1903), 213–276 (1905), 277–340 (1906), 341–392, + Inhalt, III–VII, (1907).Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1898–1912. Fauna insectorum Helvetiae. Hymenoptera, Apidae. Volume 2: Bauchsammler und schmarotzerbienen. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 11: 1–48 (1907), 49–56 (1908), 97–192 (1909); 12: 193–240 (1910), 241–256 (1911), 257–319, + Inhalt, III–V (1912). N.B. The final part, pp. 303 et seq., entitled “Systematisches verzeichnis der bis jetzt in der Schweiz gefunden”, treated solitary, social, and parasitic species. (Schaffhausen 1898–1907; thenceforth only Bern.)Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1902. Bombus grandaevus Heer. Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 10: 419.Google Scholar

Frey-Gessner, E. 1912. Tables analytiques des hyménoptères du Valais (suite). Bull. Soc. Murith. 37: 25–82 (1911). (Also, Bull. trav. Murith. Soc. Valaisanne sci. nat.)Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1888. Die schmarotzbienen und ihre wirte. Zool. Jb., abt. syst. 3: 847–870.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1893. Die bienenfauna von Deutschland und Ungarn. 80 pp. Berlin.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1895 a. Über unbekannte hummelnester. Ent. Nachr. 21: 100–103.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1895 b. Apidae Europaeae. Theil 1. Schmarotzerbienen. 218 pp., 53 figs. Friedländer, Berlin.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1902. Die arktischen Hymenoptera mit ausschluss der tenthrediniden. In: Römer & Schäudinn's Fauna Arctica, 2(3): 439–500, Taf. III (col.). Jena.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1903. Neue Bombus-arten aus der Neotropischen Region. Z. syst. Hym. Dipt. 3: 253–255.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1904 a. Über hummelleben im arktischen gebiete. (Hym.). Allg. Z. Ent. 9(21–22): 409–414.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1904 b. Beitrage zur bienenfauna von Chile, Peru und Ecuador. Z. syst. Hym. Dipt. 4: 180–188.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1904 c. Neue oder wenig bekannte hummeln des Russischen Reiches. Ann. Mus. zool. Acad. imp. Sci., St. Petersbourg 9(4): 507–523 (1905). (Also appeared as 17 continuously paginated separate, 1905.)Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1904 d. Eine bienenausbeute von Java. (Hym.). Allg. Z. Ent. 9(7–8): 138–140.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1906 a. Resultate einer reise des Herrn A. C. Jensen-Haarup in die gegend von Mendoza (Argentina). Hymenoptera, fam. Apidae. Flora fauna (Denmark) 8: 89–99.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1906 b. Nachtrag zur bienen-ausbeute in Argentina von A. C. Jensen-Haarup in den jahren 1904–5. Flora fauna 8: 99–102.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1908 a. Ueber die bienen der Russischen Polarexpedition 1900–1903 und einiger anderen arktischen ausbeuten. Mem. Acad. Sci., St. Petersburg. Ser. 8, 18(13): 1–17, 1 pl. (Also, Mem. Akad. nauk SSSR, Ser. 8, Cl. Phys.-math., 18(13): 1–17, 1 pl.)Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1908 b. Hymenoptera II. Apidae. In: Résultats de l'expédition scientifique Néerlandaise à la Nouvelle-Guinée en 1903 (sous les auspices de Arthur Wichmann). Zoologie. Vol. 5, pp. 353–359, pl. 15 (col.).Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1908 c. Die Apidae (blumenwespen) von Argentina nach den reisenergebnissen der Herren A. C. Jensen-Haarup und P. Jörgensen in den jahren 1904–1907. Flora fauna, Silkeborg, 107 pp. + 4 pp. index. Silkeborg, Denmark.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1909 a. Neue varietäten von Bombus (Hym.). Dt. ent. Z., H. 5, pp. 673–676.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1909 b. Zur synonymie der apiden. (Hym.). Dt. ent. Z., Beiheft, pp. 124–128.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1910. Neue bienenarten aus Japan. Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 60: 404–410.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1911 a. Neue varietäten von Bombus (Hym.), II. Dt. ent. Z., H. 4, pp. 456–457.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1911 b. Zur synonymie der Bombus-arten. Dt. ent. Z., H. 4, p. 684.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1911 c. Neue varietäten von Bombus, III. Dt. ent. Z., H. 5, pp. 571–572.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1913. Über einige neue apiden. Arch. Naturgesch. 78 (A, 12): 85–89 (1912).Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1914. Die bienenfauna von Java. Tijdschr. Ent. 57: 1–61.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1916 a. Zur bienenfauna von Costa Rica (Hym.). Stettin. ent. Ztg 77: 287–350.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1916 b. Über einige neue hummelformen (Bombus), besonders aus Asien (Hym.). Dt. ent. Z., H. 2, pp. 107–110.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1918 a. Wissenschaftliche ergebnisse einer forschungsreise nach Ostindien, etc. VII: Bienen aus Sumatra, Java und Ceylon. Zoöl. Jb., abt. syst. 41(h. 5): 489–520.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1918 b. Ueber hummelformen aus dem Himalaja. Dt. ent. Z., Hfn. 1–2, pp. 81–86.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1919. [Wasps and bees. In: Scientific results of the expedition of the Kuznetzov Brothers to the Arctic Ural, 1909.] Mem. Acad. Sci., St. Petersburg, Ser. 8, 28(15): 1–2. (Also, Mem. Akad. nauk SSSR, Ser. 8, Cl. Phys.-math., 28(15): 1–2.)Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1921. Nachtrag zur bienenfauna von Costa Rica. Stettin. ent. Ztg 82(hfn. 1–2): 74–101.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1922–1923. Die Europäischen bienen (Apidae), das leben und wirken unserer blumenwespen, unsw. Vols. 1, 2, 1922; vols. 3, 4, 1923; 400 pp., 25 pls. Walter de Gryter, Berlin and Leipzig.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1923 a. Eine kriegsausbeute an apiden (bienen) aus Makedonien. Zoöl. Jb., abt. syst. 46: 175–216.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1923 b. Wissenschaftliche ergebnisse der Schwedischen entomologischen reise des Herrn Dr. A. Roman in Amazonas 1914–1915. 8: Apidae. Ark. Zool. 15(13): 1–8.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1923 c. Report of the scientific results of the Norwegian expedition to Novaya Zemlya 1921. No. 14. Hymenoptera, Apidae. pp. 3–9. Vidensk. i. Kristiania, Brøggers.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1924. Über auffallende hummelformen (Hym. Apid.). Dt. ent. Z., H. 5, pp. 437–439.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1926. Die bienen, wespen, grab– und goldwespen. In: Schröder, Die insekten Mitteleuropas insbesondere Deutschlands, Bd. 1, Hymenoptera, Erster Teil, (viii) + 192 pp., 107 figs., 8 pls. Franckhische, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1931 a. Über Bombus und Psithyrus. Konowia 10(4): 300–304.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1931 b. Wie können schmarotzerbienen aus sammelbienen entstehen? II. Zoöl. Jb., abt. syst. 62 (hfn. 1–2): 1–14.Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1935. Apiden aus Nordst-Grönland. Skrifter 65, 10 pp. Norges Svalbard og Ishavs.-undersøk. Also part of: Zoological results of the Norwegian scientific expedition to East Greenland, IV. 25 pp. Dybwab, Oslo.Google Scholar

Friese, H., and Wagner, H. v.. 1904. Ueber die hummeln als zeugen natürlicher formenbildung. Zoöl. Jb., Suppl. (Fetschrift Weismann) 7: 551–570, 2 pls. (col.).Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1910. Zoölogische studien an hummeln. I. Die hummeln der Deutschen fauna. Zoöl. Jb., abt. syst. 29: 1–104, 7 pls., 20 figs. (1909).Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1912. Zoölogische studien an hummeln. II: Die hummeln der Arktis, des hochgebirges und der steppe. Zoöl. Jb., abt. syst., Suppl. 15: 155–210, 5 pls., 30 figs. (Many text figures incorrectly numbered, especially to fig. 8, pl. 5, et seq.)Google Scholar

Friese, H. 1914. Zoölogische studien an hummeln. IIa: Berichtigungen und ergänzungen zu I und II nebst theoretischen bemerkungen zur methodik der hummelforschung. Zoöl. Jb., abt. syst. 37 (h. 2): 173–198, 1 pl.Google Scholar

Friese, H., et al. 1923. Apidae, pp. 3–9. In: Scientific results of the Norwegian expedition to Novaja Zemlja. 1921. Number 14, 25 pp. Det Norske Vidensk.-akad., Oslo (Also, Videnskaps. i. Kristiania, Brøggers Boktrykkeri).Google Scholar

Frionnet, C. 1901. La rareté des Bombus en Suisse. Réponse à M. B. Jacob. Feuille jeun. Nat. 32 (s. 4): 23.Google Scholar

Frionnet, C. 1902. Bombus et Psithyrus de France et de Belgique. Feuille jeun. Nat. 32: 165–169, 177–183.Google Scholar

Frisch, K. v. 1952. Hummeln als unfreiwillige transportflieger. Nat. Volk, Frankfurt am Main 82: 171–174, 1 fig.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1916. Note on the habit of Psithyrus variabilis Cress. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 2: 46–47.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1917. Notes on Bombidae, and on the life history of Bombus auricomus Robt. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 10: 277–286, 2 pls.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1918. Additional notes on the life history of Bombus auricomus Robt. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 2: 43–48, pl. 3.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1919 a. Keys for the separation of the Bremidae, or bumblebees of Illinois, and other notes. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 12: 157–165.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1919 b. Report on the Bremidae collected by the Crocker Land Expedition of 1913–1917. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 41: 451–459, pl. xxiv.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1921 a. Psithyrus laboriosus in the nests of bumblebees (Hym.). Can. Ent. 53: 100–101.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1921 b. New distribution records for North American Bremidae, with description of a new species (Hym.). Ent. News 32: 144–148.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1921 c. Antherophagus ochraceus Mels. in the nests of bumblebees. Am. Nat. 55: 188–192.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1921 d. Hymenopterous insects of the family Bremidae from the Pribilof Islands, Alaska. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci 11(14): 185–187.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1922. Further biological and systematic notes concerning Bremus kincaidii Ckll. and other closely related species (Hym. Bremidae). Ent. News 33: 214–216.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1923 a. Biological studies of the Bremidae, or bumblebees, with special reference to the species occurring in Illinois. Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1923 b. Systematic and biological notes on bumblebees (Bremidae; Hymenoptera). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 48: 307–326.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1924. Notes on North American Bremidae. Can. Ent. 56: 292–296.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1925 a. Contribution to the classification of the Bremidae (bumblebees) of Central and South America. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 51: 137–165, pls. 5, 6.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1925 b. The bumblebees of the Philippine Islands (Bremidae: Hymenoptera). Philip. J. Sci. 27: 113–121.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1926 a. Descriptions and records of North American Bremidae, together with notes on the synonymy of certain species (Hymenoptera). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 52: 129–145.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1926 b. Contribution to the knowledge of the inter-relations of the bumblebees of Illinois with their animate environment. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 19: 203–235, pl. xvii.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1926 c. Experiments in attracting queen bumblebees to artificial domiciles. J. econ. Ent. 19(1): 149–155.Google Scholar

Frison, T. H. 1927 a. Experiments in rearing colonies of bumblebees in artificial nests. Biol. Bull. 52(1): 51–67, figs. 1–4, tab. 1.Google Scholar