Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T03:14:34.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) MOTH FLIGHT AND DISPERSAL: NEW UNDERSTANDING FROM CANOPY OBSERVATIONS, RADAR, AND AIRCRAFT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D.O. Greenbank ,
G.W. Schaefer  and
R.C. Rainey
Get access

Abstract

A research programme in New Brunswick coordinating the use of radar, specially-instrumented aircraft, and observations from platforms extending above the forest canopy has established the massive scale and regularity of evening take-off flights by spruce budworm moths, Choristoneura fumiferana, and of subsequent nocturnal dispersal at levels high above the ground. A night-viewing telescope showed moths taking off from the tree crowns up until 2330 h, 2.5 h after sunset, while radar dot echoes of uniform strength and size began to appear each night at about the same time. Direct identification of radar echoes was provided by simultaneous catches of budworm moths taken in insect-collecting nets on Cessna 185 aircraft. Moths collected during emigration, displacement, and immigration contained a high proportion of egg-carrying females.Radar recorded the rates of climb and the altitudes reached by the flying moths and provided extensive data on their numbers, density, orientation, direction, speed, and duration of displacement. Airborne moths became concentrated in zones of wind convergence, and line-echoes from moths at wind-shift fronts were detected on radar at distances of 30 km. The time of passage of wind-shift fronts over a surface site was detectable by pilot-balloon observations and by sensing equipment on a 24-m meteorological tower. Wind-fields over New Brunswick, as found from a DC-3, showed a marked contrast between the high degree of wind uniformity on many evenings and convergent winds on other evenings. Attention is focussed on the potential effects of meso-scale sea breeze fronts, of which one example is presented, and of storm cells on moth concentration and dispersal.Through the use of radar, spruce-budworm moth dispersal has been viewed for the first time in its entirety and the integrated research programme has provided new data for better evaluation of the significance of moth dispersal in the initiation and spread of infestations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 112 , Supplement S110 , 1980 , pp. 1 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blais, J.R. 1953. Effects of the destruction of the current year's foliage of balsam fir on the fecundity and habits of flight of the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 85: 446–448.Google Scholar
Clark, W.C., Jones, D.D., and Holling, C.S.. 1978. Patches, movements, and population dynamics in ecological systems: A terrestrial perspective. R.B.B. Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
Embree, D.G., Dobson, C.M.B., and Kettela, E.G.. 1976. Use of radio-controlled model aircraft for ULV insecticide application in Christmas tree stands. Bi-mon. res. Notes Can. For. Serv. 32(2): 7–9.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D.O. 1957. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. II. The role of dispersal. Can. J. Zool. 35: 385–403.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D.O. 1963. The analysis of moth survival and dispersal in the unsprayed area. pp. 87–99in Morris, R.F. (Ed.), The Dynamics of Epidemic Spruce Budworm Populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D.O. 1913. The dispersal process of spruce budworm moths. Can. For. Serv. Marit. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. M-X-39. 25 pp.Google Scholar
Henson, W.R. 1950. The means of dispersal of the spruce budworm. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, 102 pp.Google Scholar
Henson, W.R. 1951. Mass flights of the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 83: 240.Google Scholar
Johnson, C.G. 1969. Migration and Dispersal of Insects by Flight. Methuen, London. 763 pp.Google Scholar
Jones, R.E. 1977. Movement patterns and egg distribution in cabbage butterflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 195–212.Google Scholar
Joyce, R.J.V. 1968. Possible developments in the use of aircraft and associated equipment. Chemy Ind. 27 Jan. 1968: 117–120.Google Scholar
Miller, C.A. and Kettela, E.G.. 1975. Aerial control operations against the spruce budworm in New Brunswick, 1952–1913. pp. 94–112in Prebble, M.L., Aerial control of forest insects in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Miller, C.A., Greenbank, D.O., and Kettela, E.G.. 1978. Estimated egg deposition by invadrng spruce budworm moths. Can. Ent. 110: 609–615.Google Scholar
Morris, R.F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliations with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 33: 225–294.Google Scholar
Morris, R.F., Miller, C.A., Greenbank, D.O., and Mott, D.G. 1958. The population dynamics of the spruce budworm in eastern Canada. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent. Vol. 4, 1956 (1958): 137–149.Google Scholar
Morris, R.F., (Ed.). 1963. The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1968. Polyandry in spruce budworm. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 24: 6–7.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1911. Aspects of mating in the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 103: 1121–1128.Google Scholar
Petterssen, S. 1956. Weather analysis and forecasting. Motion and Motion Systems. Vol. 1. McGraw Hill, N.Y.Google Scholar
Rainey, R.C. 1974. Flying insects as ULV spray targets. Br. Crop. Prot. Counc. Monogr. 11: 20–28.Google Scholar
Rainey, R.C. 1975. New prospects for the use of aircraft in the control of flying insects and in the development of semi-arid regions. 5th int. Agric. Aviat. congr. Kenilworth: 229–233.Google Scholar
Rainey, R.C. 1976. Flight Behaviour and Features of the Atmospheric Environment. pp. 75–112in Rainey, R. C. (Ed.), Insect Flight. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 7.Google Scholar
Rainey, R.C. and Joyce, R.J.V.. 1972. The Use of Airborne Doppler equipment in monitoring windfields for airborne insects. 7th int. Aerosp. Instrum. Symp. Cranfield 1972: 8.1–8.4.Google Scholar
Royama, T. 1977. The effect of moth dispersal on the dynamics of a local spruce budworm population. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 33: 43–44.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.J. 1975. Factors affecting adult emergence and mating behavior of the eastern spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 107: 961–977.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.J. and Lucuik, G.S.. 1972. Factors affecting calling by eastern spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 104: 1751–1762.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.J. and Lucuik, G.S.. 1975. Effects of photoperiod and size on llight activity and oviposition in the eastern spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 107: 1289–1299.Google Scholar
Sanders, C.J., Wallace, D.R., and Lucuik, G.S.. 1978. Flight activity of female eastern spruce budworm at constant temperatures in the laboratory. Can. Ent. 110: 627–632.Google Scholar
Schaefer, G.W. 1969. Radar studies of locusts, moth and butterfly migration in the Sahara. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (Ser C) 34: 33, 39–40.Google Scholar
Schaefer, G.W. 1976. Radar observations of insect flight. In Rainey, R.C. (Ed.), Insect flight. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 7: 157–191.Google Scholar
Scorer, R.S. 1978. Environmental Aerodynamics. Ellis Harwood Ltd., Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Simpson, J.E. 1969. A comparison between laboratory and atmospheric density currents. Q. Jl. roy. met. Soc. 95: 758–765.Google Scholar
Simpson, J.E., Mansfield, D.A., and Milford, J.R.. 1977. Inland penetration of sea-breeze fronts. Q. Jl. roy. met. Soc. 103: 47–76.Google Scholar
Smith, S.G. 1954. A partial breakdown of temporal and ecological isolation between Choristoneura species. Evolution 8: 206–224.Google Scholar
Smithsonian Institute. 1973. Centre for short-lived phenomena. Event: 124–173.Google Scholar
Taylor, L.R. 1958. Aphid dispersal and diurnal periodicity. Proc. Linn. Soc. Lond. 169: 61–73.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.W. 1978. Relationship between oviposition history, current fecundity, and the susceptibility of spruce budworm moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to ULV aerial sprays of insecticides. Can. Ent. 110: 337–344.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.W., Miller, C.A., and Greenbank, D.O.. 1979. Spruce budworm adult spray tests, New Brunswick 1977. Can. For. Serv. Marit. For. Res. Cent. Inf Rep. M-X-99. 30 pp.Google Scholar
Wellington, W.G. 1948. The light reactions of the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 80: 56–82.Google Scholar
Wellington, W.G. 1954. Atmospheric circulation processes and insect ecology. Can. Ent. 86: 312–333.Google Scholar