Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T16:13:03.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Population Pressure as a Non-Explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

George L. Cowgill
George L. Cowgill*
Affiliation:
Brandeis University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My aim here is to summarize briefly some serious difficulties with assumptions that have frequently been made in considerations of prehistoric population and culture changes, and to suggest better alternatives. I have discussed these matters more fully, with many more references, elsewhere (Cowgill in press).

One problematic assumption is the notion that a fairly strong tendency toward increase is a natural characteristic of human populations, or at least of sedentary food-producing populations. It is taken for granted that as a rule population growth will continue in a region until a point is reached at which further growth would create (or at least pose serious threat of) major shortages of important resources. A second fallacy is the assumption that stresses resulting from resource shortages will naturally tend to evoke developmental responses. Cultural development or evolution is frequently explained as a response to such stresses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology , Volume 30: Population Studies in Archaeology and Biological Anthropology: A Symposium , 1975 , pp. 127 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Binford, Lewis R. 1968 Post-Pleistocene adaptations. In New perspectives in archeology, edited by Binford, Sally R. and Binford, Lewis R., pp. 313–341. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Birdsell, Joseph B. 1957 Some population problems involving Pleistocene man. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 22:47–69.Google Scholar
Boserup, Esther 1965 The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change under population pressure. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter 1967 Sociology and modern systems theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Carneiro, Robert L. 1970 A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169:733–738.Google Scholar
Carneiro, Robert L. 1972 From autonomous villages to the state, a numerical estimation. In Population growth: anthropological implications, edited by Spooner, Brian, pp. 64–77. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Cowgill, George L. 1974 On causes and consequences of ancient and modern population changes. American Anthropologist (in press).Google Scholar
Hassan, Fekri A. 1973 On mechanisms of population growth during the Neolithic. Current Anthropology 14:535–542. Mamdani, MahmoodCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, Fekri A. 1973 The myth of population control: family, caste and class in an Indian village. Monthly Review Press, New York.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S. 1973 The discovery of America. Science 179:969–974.Google Scholar
Polgar, Steven 1972 Population history and population policies from an anthropological perspective. Current Anthropology 13:203–211.Google Scholar
Sanders, William T., and Price, Barbara J. 1968 Mesoamerica: the evolution of a civilization. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Albert C. 1973 Archeology in the active voice: the new anthropology. In Research and theory in current archeology, edited by Redman, Charles L., pp. 337–354. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Spooner, Brian (Editor) 1972 Population growth: anthropological implications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar