Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T08:14:38.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Appendix

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The University of Kentucky provided the engravings and the folded tables for this appendix.

2 In the large cranial series from North Alabama it was found that the calculated capacity nearly always exceeded that obtained by the seed measurement method to the average extent of about 25 cc. (Unpublished data by M. T. Newman and C. E. Snow.)

3 The large, pooled, east central Algonkin series examined by Von Bonin and Morant is quite similar to the Tchefuncte group (1938, pp. 94-129).

4 Unpublished data on Alabama pathological material examined by Wm. McKee German, M.D.

5 From two sites, Ma° 48, Mav 10, Madison County, north Alabama were obtained cranial series which were relatively and absolutely broader vaulted than the series from other shell mound sites along the Tennessee River. Unpublished data of M. T. Newmann and C E. Snow.

6 Goldstein, M. S., Unpublished paper on Conclusions on Indian Skeletal Remains from Texas before American Association of Physical Anthropologists, Cambridge, Mass., April, 1942.