Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:15:13.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authors' Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2006

Dale E. Newbury
Dale E. Newbury
Affiliation:
NIST, Gaithersburg, MD 20899
Get access

Extract

I am pleased to respond to the letter from Simon Burgess commenting on my article, “Misidentification of Major Constituents by Automatic Qualitative Energy Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis: A Problem That Threatens the Credibility of the Analytical Community” (Newbury, 2005). First, I am grateful for the words of support for my article, even if inevitably qualified, expressed in Mr. Burgess's letter. In response to his specific comments (in boldface), I offer the following:

Type
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 282 - 284
Copyright
© 2006 Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Newbury, Dale E. (2005). Misidentification of major constituents by automatic qualitative energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis: A problem that threatens the credibility of the analytical community. Microsc Microanal 11, 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statham, P.J. (2002). Limitations to accuracy in extracting characteristic line intensities from X-ray spectra. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 107, 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar