Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-02T10:26:47.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contrast formation mechanisms in the environmental scanning electron microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

M. Toth
Affiliation:
Microstructural Analysis Unit, University of Technology, SydneyPO Box 123, Broadway, NSW2007, Australia
M.R. Phillips
Affiliation:
Microstructural Analysis Unit, University of Technology, SydneyPO Box 123, Broadway, NSW2007, Australia
Get access

Extract

Uncoated, non-conductive samples can be imaged and analyzed in the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) due to effective charge neutralization at the sample surface by ionized gas molecules. Under some gas pressure and electron dose conditions, ESEM images of uncoated, poorly conductive samples often contain contrast not present in secondary or backscattered electron images of the (coated) samples obtained in conventional SEMs. It has been proposed that the contrast is related to charge trapping at defects and impurities. It has also been suggested that UV cathodoluminescence (CL) may contribute to contrast in the ESEM. In this paper, we present experimental evidence of contrast formation in the ESEM due to charge trapping in Dy doped zircon, electron trapping at oxygen vacancies in sapphire and the absence of signal generation by 360nm UV CL.

The specimens used in this study were (i) cross-sectioned Titanium in-diffusion doped sapphire single crystal, (ii) Dy doped synthetic Zircon7 and (iii) 43 μm epitaxial GaN grown on c-pane sapphire by hydride vapor phase epitaxy.

Type
Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy and Other Wet Work
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.Danilatos, G.D., Mikrochim Acta, 114/115 (1994) 143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Griffin, B.J., Microscopy & Microanalysis (1997) 1197-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Griffin, B.J., Microscopy & Microanalysis (1998) 292-3Google Scholar
4.Baroni, T.C., Griffin, B.J. and Lincoln, F.J., Proceedings AMAS V (1999) 36Google Scholar
5.Griffin, B.J. and Browne, J.R., Proceedings AMAS V (1999) 34Google Scholar
6.Flerov, V.I.et al., Radiation Measurements 26(2) (1996) 253258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Remond, G.et al., Scanning Microscopy Supplement 9 (1995) 5776Google Scholar
8.Goldys, E.M.et al., Applied Physics Letters 73(24) (1998) 35833585CrossRefGoogle Scholar