Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T05:20:18.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Soil Removal and Flooding on Leaf Cell Structure of Quercus Falcata Var. Pagodaefolia and Qurecus Nigra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Zhu Hua Ning
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agricultural, Family and Consumer Sciences, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA70813
Kamran K. Abdollahi
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural Sciences, College of Agricultural, Family and Consumer Sciences, Southern University and A&M College, Baton Rouge, LA70813
Get access

Extract

Soil removal and flooding are serious problems for many urban trees. The main purpose of this paper is to outline some changes which occur in leaves of cherrybark oak (Quercus falcata var. pagodaefolia) and water oak (Quercus nigra) during soil removal and flooding treatments. There has not been any prior documentation of leaf tissue of trees under these conditions. Two-year-old saplings of cherrybark oaks and water oaks were randomly planted in twenty-four experimental plots. Trees were randomly subjected to a combination of soil removal and flooding treatments for one year. Leaf tissues were collected from trees in controlled and treated plots. Tissues were fixed overnight at 4° C in 4% glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.07M cacodylate at pH of 7.2 and post-fixed for one hour in 1% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer. After washing thoroughly in the buffer, tissues were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in Eponate 12 resin. Thin sections of 75nm thick were cut with a MT-6000 ultratome and placed on 300 mesh copper grids. Sections were then positive stained with uranyl acetate followed by lead citrate. All examinations of the cell structure were made using a Zeiss EM 10C transmission electron microscope.

Type
Plant Biology and Pathology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

This work was funded by USDA-CSREES. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance from the EM Center at the School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar