Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:51:25.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Na+ and K+ Ions Differently Affect Nucleosome Structure, Stability, and Interactions with Proteins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2021

Tatyana V. Andreeva ,
Natalya V. Maluchenko ,
Anastasiia L. Sivkina ,
Oleg V. Chertkov ,
Maria E. Valieva Open the ORCID record for Maria E. Valieva [Opens in a new window] ,
Elena Y. Kotova ,
Mikhail P. Kirpichnikov ,
Vasily M. Studitsky  and
Alexey V. Feofanov Open the ORCID record for Alexey V. Feofanov [Opens in a new window]
Tatyana V. Andreeva
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
Natalya V. Maluchenko
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
Anastasiia L. Sivkina
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
Oleg V. Chertkov
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
Maria E. Valieva
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia
Elena Y. Kotova
Affiliation:
Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA
Mikhail P. Kirpichnikov
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
Vasily M. Studitsky
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA
Alexey V. Feofanov*
Affiliation:
Biology Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119234, Russia Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
*
*Corresponding author: Alexey V. Feofanov, E-mail: avfeofanov@yandex.ru
Get access

Abstract

Inorganic ions are essential factors stabilizing nucleosome structure; however, many aspects of their effects on DNA transactions in chromatin remain unknown. Here, differential effects of K+ and Na+ on the nucleosome structure, stability, and interactions with protein complex FACT (FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1, and RNA polymerase II were studied using primarily single-particle Förster resonance energy transfer microscopy. The maximal stabilizing effect of K+ on a nucleosome structure was observed at ca. 80–150 mM, and it decreased slightly at 40 mM and considerably at >300 mM. The stabilizing effect of Na+ is noticeably lower than that of K+ and progressively decreases at ion concentrations higher than 40 mM. At 150 mM, Na+ ions support more efficient reorganization of nucleosome structure by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and ATP-independent uncoiling of nucleosomal DNA by FACT as compared with K+ ions. In contrast, transcription through a nucleosome is nearly insensitive to K+ or Na+ environment. Taken together, the data indicate that K+ environment is more preserving for chromatin structure during various nucleosome transactions than Na+ environment.

Keywords

FACTnucleosomepoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1potassium ionRNA polymerase IIsodium ionstructure
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 243 - 253
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allahverdi, A, Chen, Q, Korolev, N & Nordenskiöld, L (2015). Chromatin compaction under mixed salt conditions: Opposite effects of sodium and potassium ions on nucleosome array folding. Sci Rep 5, 8512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biswas, D, Yu, Y, Prall, M, Formosa, T & Stillman, DJ (2005). The yeast FACT complex has a role in transcriptional initiation. Mol Cell Biol 25, 5812–5822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhm, V, Hieb, AR, Andrews, AJ, Gansen, A, Rocker, A, Tóth, K, Luger, K & Langowski, J (2011). Nucleosome accessibility governed by the dimer/tetramer interface. Nucleic Acids Res 39, 3093–3102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bondarenko, VA, Steele, LM, Újvári, A, Gaykalova, DA, Kulaeva, OI, Polikanov, YS, Luse, DS & Studitsky, VM (2006). Nucleosomes can form a polar barrier to transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell 24, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braunlin, WH & Nordenskiöld, L (1984). A potassium-39 NMR study of potassium binding to double-helical DNA. Eur J Biochem 142, 133–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buning, R & Van Noort, J (2010). Single-pair FRET experiments on nucleosome conformational dynamics. Biochimie 92, 1729–1740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caldecott, KW (2007). Mammalian single-strand break repair: Mechanisms and links with chromatin. DNA Repair 6, 443–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrivain, P, Cournac, A, Lavelle, C, Lesne, A, Mozziconacci, J, Paillusson, F, Signon, L, Victor, JM & Barbi, M (2012). Electrostatics of DNA compaction in viruses, bacteria and eukaryotes: Functional insights and evolutionary perspective. Soft Matter 8, 9285–9301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vos, M, Schreiber, V & Dantzer, F (2012). The diverse roles and clinical relevance of PARPs in DNA damage repair: Current state of the art. Biochem Pharmacol 84, 137–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feofanov, AV, Andreeva, TV, Studitsky, VM & Kirpichnikov, MP (2018). Reversibility of structural rearrangements in mononucleosomes induced by ionic strength. Mosc Univ Biol Sci Bull 73, 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gansen, A, Hieb, AR, Böhm, V, Tóth, K & Langowski, J (2013). Closing the gap between single molecule and bulk FRET analysis of nucleosomes. PLoS One 8, e57018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaykalova, DA, Kulaeva, OI, Bondarenko, VA & Studitsky, VM (2009). Preparation and analysis of uniquely positioned mononucleosomes. Methods Mol Biol 523, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaykalova, DA, Kulaeva, OI, Pestov, NA, Hsieh, F-K & Studitsky, VM (2012). Experimental analysis of the mechanism of chromatin remodeling by RNA polymerase II. Methods Enzymol 512, 293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazan, NP, Tomov, TE, Tsukanov, R, Liber, M, Berger, Y, Masoud, R, Toth, K, Langowski, J & Nir, E (2015). Nucleosome core particle disassembly and assembly kinetics studied using single-molecule fluorescence. Biophys J 109, 1676–1685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibino, K, Yoshikawa, Y, Murata, S, Saito, T, Zinchenko, AA & Yoshikawa, K (2006). Na+ more strongly inhibits DNA compaction by spermidine (3+) than K+. Chem Phys Lett 426, 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kireeva, ML, Walter, W, Tchernajenko, V, Bondarenko, V, Kashlev, M & Studitsky, VM (2002). Nucleosome remodeling induced by RNA polymerase II: Loss of the H2A/H2B dimer during transcription. Mol Cell 9, 541–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klemm, SL, Shipony, Z & Greenleaf, WJ (2019). Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nat Rev Genet 20, 207–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korolev, N, Lyubartsev, AP, Rupprecht, A & Nordenskiöld, L (1999 a). Competitive binding of Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, and K+ ions to DNA in oriented DNA fibers: Experimental and monte carlo simulation results. Biophys J 77, 2736–2749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolev, N, Lyubartsev, AP, Rupprecht, A & Nordenskiöld, L (1999 b). Experimental and monte carlo simulation studies on the competitive binding of Li+, Na+, and K+ ions to DNA in oriented DNA fibers. J Phys Chem B 103, 9008–9019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolev, N & Nordenskiöld, L (2000). Influence of alkali cation nature on structural transitions and reactions of biopolyelectrolytes. Biomacromolecules 1, 648–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, WL (2008). Transcriptional control by PARP-1: Chromatin modulation, enhancer-binding, coregulation, and insulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 20, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kudryashova, KS, Chertkov, OV, Nikitin, DV, Pestov, NA, Kulaeva, OI, Efremenko, AV, Solonin, AS, Kirpichnikov, MP, Studitsky, VM & Feofanov, AV (2015). Preparation of mononucleosomal templates for analysis of transcription with RNA polymerase using spFRET. Methods Mol Biol 1288, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulaeva, OI, Gaykalova, DA, Pestov, NA, Golovastov, VV, Vassylyev, DG, Artsimovitch, I & Studitsky, VM (2009). Mechanism of chromatin remodeling and recovery during passage of RNA polymerase II. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16, 1272–1278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulaeva, OI, Hsieh, FK, Chang, HW, Luse, DS & Studitsky, VM (2013). Mechanism of transcription through a nucleosome by RNA polymerase II. Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech 1829, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langelier, MF, Steffen, JD, Riccio, AA, McCauley, M & Pascal, JM (2017). Purification of DNA damage-dependent PARPs from E. coli for structural and biochemical analysis. In Methods in Molecular Biology, Tulin, A (Ed.), vol. 1608. pp. 431–444. New York, NY: Humana Press Inc.Google Scholar
Lowary, PT & Widom, J (1998). New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 276, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyubitelev, AV, Studitsky, VM, Feofanov, AV & Kirpichnikov, MP (2017). Effect of sodium and potassium ions on conformation of linker parts of nucleosomes. Mosc Univ Biol Sci Bull 72, 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Materese, CK, Savelyev, A & Papoian, GA (2009). Counterion atmosphere and hydration patterns near a nucleosome core particle. J Am Chem Soc 131, 15005–15013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onufriev, AV & Schiessel, H (2019). The nucleosome: From structure to function through physics. Curr Opin Struct Biol 56, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prieto, EI & Maeshima, K (2019). Dynamic chromatin organization in the cell. Essays Biochem 63, 133–145.Google Scholar
Ruone, S, Rhoades, AR & Formosa, T (2003). Multiple Nhp6 molecules are required to recruit Spt16-Pob3 to form yFACT complexes and to reorganize nucleosomes. J Biol Chem 278, 45288–45295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savelyev, A & Papoian, GA (2006). Electrostatic, steric, and hydration interactions favor Na+ condensation around DNA compared with K+. J Am Chem Soc 128, 14506–14518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stillman, DJ (2010). Nhp6: A small but powerful effector of chromatin structure in saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1799, 175–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strick, R, Strissel, PL, Gavrilov, K & Levi-Setti, R (2001). Cation-chromatin binding as shown by ion microscopy is essential for the structural integrity of chromosomes. J Cell Biol 155, 899–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sultanov, D, Gerasimova, N, Kudryashova, K, Maluchenko, N, Kotova, E, Langelier, M-F, Pascal, J, Kirpichnikov, M, Feofanov, A & Studitsky, V (2017). Unfolding of core nucleosomes by PARP-1 revealed by spFRET microscopy. AIMS Genet 4, 21–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Valieva, ME, Armeev, GA, Kudryashova, KS, Gerasimova, NS, Shaytan, AK, Kulaeva, OI, McCullough, LL, Formosa, T, Georgiev, PG, Kirpichnikov, MP, Studitsky, VM & Feofanov, AV (2016). Large-scale ATP-independent nucleosome unfolding by a histone chaperone. Nat Struct Mol Biol 23, 1111–1116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vieregg, J, Cheng, W, Bustamante, C & Tinoco, I (2007). Measurement of the effect of monovalent cations on RNA hairpin stability. J Am Chem Soc 129, 14966–14973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinchenko, AA & Yoshikawa, K (2005). Na+ shows a markedly higher potential than K+ in DNA compaction in a crowded environment. Biophys J 88, 4118–4123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Andreeva et al. supplementary material

Andreeva et al. supplementary material

Download Andreeva et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB