Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T12:18:45.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanning Electron Microscopy Investigation of Deformation in the Vicinity of a Mode II Crack Tip in Unidirectional Toughened Epoxy Composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

E.V. Iarve
Affiliation:
U, University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH, 45469-0168
W. Ragland
Affiliation:
U, University of Dayton Research Institute, Dayton, OH, 45469-0168
Get access

Abstract

Delamination related research in fiber-reinforced composites has attracted considerable interest due to its significant practical importance. Significant difference in deformation patterns in the crack tip vicinity were observed for Mode I and Mode II delaminations and reported by several authors including [1-3]. A sequence of 45° (with respect to the crack plane) microcracks is believed to form beyond the Mode II crack tip in polymer composites. The propagation of a Mode II crack is believed to be a result of rupture and coalescence of these tension microcracks.

A Philips XL30 ESEM scanning electron microscope was used for testing. A three-point bend stage was designed to perform in situ end notch flexure tests on a pre-cracked miniature (1.4” long and 0.25” wide) 24-ply unidirectional specimen. The material system utilized in the experiment was a toughened carbon epoxy unidirectional composite, IM7/977-3. The miniature specimen was cut out of a standard size (8” long, 1” wide) specimen after a shear crack formed in the course of ENF testing.

Type
Advanced Composites
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.O’Brien, T.K., “Composite Interlaminar Shear Fracture Toughness, Glic: Shear Measurment or Sheer Myth,” Composite Materials Fatigue and Fracture, v. 7, ASTM STP 1330, Bucinell, R.B., Ed. (1998), pp. 318Google Scholar
2.’'Brien, T.K., “Interlaminar Fracture toughness: the Long and Winding Road to Standardization,” Composites Part B (1998), pp. 5762Google Scholar
3.Corleto, C., Bradley, W.and Henricsen, M., “Correspondence between Fields and Damage Zones Ahead of Crack Tip of Composites Under Mode I and Mode II Delamination,“ ICCM-VI Proceedings (1987), V.3, pp. 378387Google Scholar