Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:28:36.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secondary Electron Yield Curve for Liquid Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

B.L. Thiel
Affiliation:
Polymers and Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
D.J. Stokes
Affiliation:
Polymers and Colloids Group, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
D. Phifer
Affiliation:
FEI-Philips-Electroscan, 66A Concord Street, Wilmington, MA, USA
Get access

Extract

We have measured the secondary electron yield curve for liquid water using an Environmental SEM. The secondary electron emission coefficient, measured as a function of incident electron energy, is important for interpreting contrast in hydrated biological and inorganic specimens. This information is even more critical for water than other materials, as it is a factor of prime importance in understanding radiation damage in biological tissues.[1]

These measurements were taken using a Philips XL-30 field emission ,ESEM, and repeated on an Electroscan E3 ESEM, equipped with a CeB6 filament. A specially designed Faraday cup was fashioned from brass and fitted with a removable graphite cup having an inset for a platinum aperture. This assembly was placed into an electrically floating Peltier cooling stage, and connected to a KE Instruments probe current meter.

Type
Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy and Other Wet Work
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Ritchie, R.H., et al, Physical and Chemical Mechanisms in Molecular Radiation Biology, Glass, W.A. and Varma, M.N., eds.. Plenum (1991) 99135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[2] Thiel, B.L., et al,. J. Microscopy, 187 (1997) 143157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[3] Suszcynsky, D.M. and Borovsky, J.E., J. Geophys. Res., 97 (1992) 26112619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

[4] Burke, E.A., IEEE Trans. Nuc. Sci., NS-72 (1980) 1760-1764.Google Scholar