Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:21:38.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Solidification Behavior of a 319 Aluminum Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

W. T. Donlon
Affiliation:
Ford Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 2053, MD3135, Dearborn, MI, 48121-2053
L.A. Godlewski
Affiliation:
Ford Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 2053, MD3135, Dearborn, MI, 48121-2053
J. W. Zindel
Affiliation:
Ford Research Laboratories, P.O. Box 2053, MD3135, Dearborn, MI, 48121-2053
Get access

Extract

319 aluminum (6.5-8.5% Si, 3.0-4.0%Cu, 0.2-0.45%Mg, 0.8%max.Fe, 0.5%max.Mn) is utilized by the automobile industry for engine block and cylinder head applications. Detailed understanding of the solidification behavior is critical to optimizing the “as-cast” microstructure and the physical properties of this alloy. Samples were generated by allowing a 50 gram sample of molten alloy to partially solidify at a slow cooling rate (0.34 °C/sec). During cooling, the temperature of the alloy was monitored by a thermocouple in the center of the sample to generate a cooling curve (Fig. 1). At various locations along this cooling curve the normal cooling was interrupted by plunging the cup into an iced- brine quench. In addition to optical and SEM examination, detailed TEM analysis was performed on three quenched samples as well as one sample allowed to cool uninterrupted to room temperature. TEM sample preparation consisted of standard grinding and dimpling procedures followed by ion milling at liquid nitrogen temperature using a gun voltage of 4keV.

Type
Microscopy and Microanalysis in the “Real World”
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1Phragmen, G., J. Inst. Met., 77, (1950) 489.Google Scholar
2Mulazimoglu, M.H., Zaluska, A., Gruzleski, J.E., Paray, F., Metall. & Mat. Trans, 27A, (1996) 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar