Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T06:19:22.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spectroscopy and Imaging With Energy-Filtering Tems: Parameters That Matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

G. Kothleitner
Affiliation:
Research Institute f. Electron Microscopy, Graz University of Technology Steyrergasse 17, A-8010, Graz, Austria
H. A. Brink
Affiliation:
Gatan Research & Development, 5933 Coronado Lane, Pleasanton, CA94588USA
Get access

Extract

Spectroscopy and imaging techniques based on electron energy-losses (EELS), which are accessible through energy-filtering transmission electron microscopes (EFTEMs), have proven to be important tools in both materials and life science investigations.

The two most widely used techniques on commercially available EFTEMs are elastic imaging and elemental mapping. Elastic imaging enhances image resolution and contrast by extracting the zero-loss signal and eliminating the inelastic background, whereas elemental mapping, which involves signals coming from element-specific inner-shell ionization edges, is employed to form two dimensional elemental distribution images. In both cases relatively large energy windows of a range of 10 to 30eVare typically used to form energy-filtered images with usually low to moderately high magnifications.

There is however much more information available in an EELS spectrum, which is contained in the detailed fine structure within 0-20eV of a core excitation edge (ELNES) or in the very low energy-loss up to 5eV.

Type
Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) and Imaging
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Reimer, L., Energy-Filtering Transmission Electron Microscopy (1995), Springer Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Leapman, R.D., and Hunt, J.A., in:Microscopy the key research tool (1997) 39Google Scholar
3.Hofer, F. et al, Ultramicroscopy 67 (1997) 83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mayer, J. et al., International Congress of Electron Mcroscopy 13 Paris (1994) 615Google Scholar
5.Batson, P. E.. EMSA Bulletin 17 (1987) 64Google Scholar
6.Uhlemann, S. and Rose, H., Optik 96 (1994) 163Google Scholar
7.Kxivaneket, O. L. al., Ultramicroscopy 59 (1995) 267Google Scholar
8.Uhlemann, S., and Rose, H., Ultramicroscopy 63 (1996) 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar