Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T16:22:50.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Morphological Changes Of Hela Cells Exposed To Tamoxifen And Taxol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S.K. Majumdar
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA18042
J. Valdellon
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Lafayette College, Easton, PA18042
Get access

Extract

Tamoxifen and taxol are two promising chemotherapeutic agents currently used in cancer treatment, but each has its own unique mechanism of action. Tamoxifen, known to inhibit the activity of estrogen on malignant mammary gland cells, was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of breast cancer. Taxol, extracted from the Pacific Yew tree, Taxus brevifolia, is an antimitotic agent that binds specifically to the β-subunit, promoting the assembly and stabilization of tubulin polymers. Studies have shown that tamoxifen and taxol induce cytostatic and cytotoxic effects leading to the death of several cancer cell types in vitro.In this research, the surface ultrastructural effects of both tamoxifen and taxol were investigated in human cervical cancer cells (HeLa).

Exponentially growing cells were treated with 5, 10, 15, and 20 μg/ml of tamoxifen and 1 μg/ml of taxol (LC50) for 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the cells were grown on coverslips, fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde followed by 1% osmium tetroxide.

Type
Biological Ultrastructure(Cells, Tissues, Organ Systems)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Grese, T.A., et al, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 25 (1997) 105.Google Scholar
2.Horowitz, S.B.,et al, Trends Pharmacol. 13(1992)134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Compton, M.M., Cancer and Metastasis Review 11(1992)105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bachman, C.A., In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Animal 34 (1998) 434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Bellomo, G., Methods in Toxicology, Part B 1 (1994) 58.Google Scholar