Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T17:44:33.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Sensitivity and Resolution in LVSEM Imaging and Microanalysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Ed Boyes*
Affiliation:
DuPont Company, Experimental Station, PO Box 80356, Wilmington, DE, 19880-0356, USA
Get access

Extract

The surface sensitivity of both imaging and EDX chemical microanalysis of materials, micro-fabrications and nanostructures can be greatly enhanced by using low beam energies in the SEM (LVSEM). This has become more apparent with the advent of instruments which are relatively uncompromised in performance (<5nm) at a range of low voltages around 1kV, and especially ones with higher resolution (≤2.5nm) and full digital imaging to make a wide range of conditions more readily accessible (1). They yield images of natural surfaces retaining their inherent chemical and electronic image contrasts and with probe sizes comparable to those which we are familar with at high voltages, but where many samples require to be coated with metal. The traditional SEM resolution test samples for evaluating SEM imaging are far from a typical bulk SEM sample. The small heavy metal particles on a carbon support behave more like the STEM situation since the backscattering of electrons from the support, and hence the generation of type 2 secondary electrons, is very limited.

Type
Low Voltage Sem Imaging and Analysis for the Biological and Materials Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Boyes, E, Proc ICEM-13, Paris, 1994, 5154Google Scholar
2.Bethe, H, Handbuch der Physik, Springer, Berlin, 1933Google Scholar
3.Cazaux, J, Jbara, O and Thomas, X, Surf and Interface Anal, 15 (1990), 56758110.1002/sia.740150911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. e.g. Reed, S, “Electron Microprobe Analysis”, CUP, 1993Google Scholar
5.Bastin, G and Heijligers, H in “Electron Probe Quantitation” Ed Heinrich, K and Newbury, D, Plenum, 1991, 14516110.1007/978-1-4899-2617-3_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hejna, J, Scanning, 17 (1995) 38739410.1002/sca.4950170607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Reimer, L and Tolkamp, C, Scanning, 3 (1980) 353910.1002/sca.4950030105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Czernuszka, J et al Phil Mag Letts 62 (1990) 22710.1080/09500839008215127CrossRefGoogle Scholar