Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T12:16:48.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative Comparison of Phase Contrast Imaging in Conventional TEM Focal Series and STEM Ptychography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2016

Emanuela Liberti
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Rd, Oxford, UK
Hao Yang
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, National Center for Electron Microscopy, Molecular Foundry, 1 Cyclotron Rd, Berkeley, CA, USA
Gerardo Martinez
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Rd, Oxford, UK
Peter Nellist
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Rd, Oxford, UK
Angus Kirkland
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Parks Rd, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstract
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2016 

References

References:

[1] Lehmann, M., et al, Ultramicroscopy 54 (1994) 335344.Google Scholar
[2] Coene, W. M. J., et al, Ultramicroscopy 64 (1996) 109135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Rodenburg, J. M., et al, Ultramicroscopy 48 (1993) 304314.Google Scholar
[4] Hÿtch, M. J. & Stobbs, W.M. Ultramicroscopy 53 (1994) 191203.Google Scholar
[5] Kirkland, A. I., et al, Ultramicroscopy 57 (1995) 355374.Google Scholar
[6] Rodenburg, J. M. & Bates, R. H. T. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 339 (1992) 521553.Google Scholar
[7] Howie, A. Ultramicroscopy 98 (2004) 7379.Google Scholar
[8] The authors acknowledge funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement 312483-ESTEEM2 (Integrated Infrastructure Initiative-I3) and from the EPSRC under grant number EP/M010708/1.Google Scholar