Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T13:00:42.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rapid Determination of the Distribution of Cellulose Nanomaterial Aggregates in Composites Enabled by Multi-Channel Spectral Confocal Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2019

Marcus A. Johns ,
Anna E. Lewandowska  and
Stephen J. Eichhorn Open the ORCID record for Stephen J. Eichhorn [Opens in a new window]
Marcus A. Johns
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Bristol Composites Institute (ACCIS), University of Bristol, Queens Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Anna E. Lewandowska
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Bristol Composites Institute (ACCIS), University of Bristol, Queens Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Stephen J. Eichhorn*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Bristol Composites Institute (ACCIS), University of Bristol, Queens Building, University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Stephen J. Eichhorn, E-mail: s.j.eichhorn@bristol.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

There is increased interest in the use of cellulose nanomaterials for the mechanical reinforcement of composites due to their high stiffness and strength. However, challenges remain in accurately determining their distribution within composite microstructures. We report the use of a range of techniques used to image aggregates of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) greater than 10 µm2 within a model thermoplastic polymer. While Raman imaging accurately determines CNC aggregate size, it requires extended periods of analysis and the limited observable area results in poor reproducibility. In contrast, staining the CNCs with a fluorophore enables rapid acquisition with high reproducibility, but overestimates the aggregate size as CNC content increases. Multi-channel spectral confocal laser scanning microscopy is presented as an alternative technique that combines the accuracy of Raman imaging with the speed and reproducibility of conventional confocal laser scanning microscopy, enabling the rapid determination of CNC aggregate distribution within composites.

Keywords

cellulosecompositesconfocal microscopyconfocal Raman spectroscopynanomaterialsspectral imaging
Type
Materials Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 682 - 689
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abitbol, T, Palermo, A, Moran-Mirabal, JM & Cranston, ED (2013). Fluorescent labeling and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals with varying charge contents. Biomacromolecules 14, 3278–3284.Google Scholar
Agarwal, UP, Sabo, R, Reiner, RS, Clemons, CM & Rudie, AW (2012). Spatially resolved characterization of cellulose nanocrystal–polypropylene composite by confocal Raman microscopy. Appl Spectrosc 66, 750–756.Google Scholar
Albinsson, B, Li, S, Lundquist, K & Stomberg, R (1999). The origin of lignin fluorescence. J Mol Struct 508, 19–27.Google Scholar
Batmaz, R, Mohammed, N, Zaman, M, Minhas, G, Berry, RM & Tam, KC (2014). Cellulose nanocrystals as promising adsorbents for the removal of cationic dyes. Cellulose 21, 1655–1665.Google Scholar
Bi, Q, Dong, S, Sun, Y, Lu, X & Zhao, L (2016). An electrochemical sensor based on cellulose nanocrystal for the enantioselective discrimination of chiral amino acids. Anal Biochem 508, 50–57.Google Scholar
Camarero-Espinosa, S, Rothen-Rutishauser, B, Weder, C & Foster, EJ (2016). Directed cell growth in multi-zonal scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 74, 42–52.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, A & Teramoto, Y (2018). Recent advances in nanocellulose composites with polymers: A guide for choosing partners and How to incorporate them. Polymers (Basel) 10, 517–563.Google Scholar
Endes, C, Mueller, S, Kinnear, C, Vanhecke, D, Foster, EJ, Petri-Fink, A, Weder, C, Clift, MJD & Rothen-Rutishauser, B (2015). Fate of cellulose nanocrystal aerosols deposited on the lung cell surface in vitro. Biomacromolecules 16, 1267–1275.Google Scholar
Foster, EJ, Moon, RJ, Agarwal, UP, Bortner, MJ, Bras, J, Camarero-Espinosa, S, Chan, KJ, Clift, MJD, Cranston, ED, Eichhorn, SJ, Fox, DM, Hamad, WY, Heux, L, Jean, B, Korey, M, Nieh, W, Ong, KJ, Reid, MS, Renneckar, S, Roberts, R, Shatkin, JA, Simonsen, J, Stinson-Bagby, K, Wanasekara, N & Youngblood, J (2018). Current characterization methods for cellulose nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 47, 2609–2679.Google Scholar
Gong, YY, Tan, YQ, Mei, J, Zhang, YR, Yuan, WZ, Zhang, YM, Sun, JZ & Tang, BZ (2013). Room temperature phosphorescence from natural products: Crystallization matters. Sci China: Chem 56, 1178–1182.Google Scholar
Haghpanah, JS, Tu, R, Da Silva, S, Yan, D, Mueller, S, Weder, C, Foster, EJ, Sacui, I, Gilman, JW & Montclare, JK (2013). Bionanocomposites: Differential effects of cellulose nanocrystals on protein diblock copolymers. Biomacromolecules 14, 4360–4367.Google Scholar
He, X, Xiao, Q, Lu, C, Wang, Y, Zhang, X, Zhao, J, Zhang, W, Zhang, X & Deng, Y (2014). Uniaxially aligned electrospun all-cellulose nanocomposite nanofibers reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals: Scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomacromolecules 15, 618–627.Google Scholar
Hu, Z, Marway, HS, Kasem, H, Pelton, R & Cranston, ED (2016). Dried and redispersible cellulose nanocrystal Pickering emulsions. ACS Macro Lett 5, 185–189.Google Scholar
Jackson, JK, Letchford, K, Wasserman, BZ, Ye, L, Hamad, WY & Burt, HM (2011). The use of nanocrystalline cellulose for the binding and controlled release of drugs. Int J Nanomed 6, 321–330.Google Scholar
Johns, MA, Bae, Y, Guimarães, FEG, Lanzoni, EM, Costa, CAR, Murray, PM, Deneke, C, Galembeck, F, Scott, JL & Sharma, RI (2018). Predicting ligand-free cell attachment on next-generation cellulose–chitosan hydrogels. ACS Omega 3, 937–945.Google Scholar
Kalita, E, Nath, BK, Agan, F, More, V & Deb, P (2015). Isolation and characterization of crystalline, autofluorescent, cellulose nanocrystals from saw dust wastes. Ind Crops Prod 65, 550–555.Google Scholar
Kargarzadeh, H, Mariano, M, Huang, J, Lin, N, Ahmad, I, Dufresne, A & Thomas, S (2017). Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: A review. Polymer 132, 368–393.Google Scholar
Leng, T, Jakubek, ZJ, Mazloumi, M, Leung, ACW & Johnston, LJ (2017). Ensemble and single particle fluorescence characterization of dye-labeled cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 33, 8002–8011.Google Scholar
Lewandowska, AE & Eichhorn, SJ (2016). Quantification of the degree of mixing of cellulose nanocrystals in thermoplastics using Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 47, 1337–1342.Google Scholar
Lewandowska, AE, Inai, NH, Ghita, OR & Eichhorn, SJ (2018). Quantitative analysis of the distribution and mixing of cellulose nanocrystals in thermoplastic composites using Raman chemical imaging. RSC Adv 8, 35831–35839.Google Scholar
Liew, SY, Walsh, DA & Thielemans, W (2013). High total-electrode and mass-specific capacitance cellulose nanocrystal-polypyrrole nanocomposites for supercapacitors. RSC Adv 3, 9158–9162.Google Scholar
Lou, Y-R, Kanninen, L, Kuisma, T, Niklander, J, Noon, LA, Burks, D, Urtti, A & Yliperttula, M (2014). The use of nanofibrillar cellulose hydrogel as a flexible three-dimensional model to culture human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 23, 380–392.Google Scholar
Malainine, ME, Mahrouz, M & Dufresne, A (2005). Thermoplastic nanocomposites based on cellulose microfibrils from Opuntia ficus-indica parenchyma cell. Compos Sci Technol 65, 1520–1526.Google Scholar
Malinowska, KH, Rind, T, Verdorfer, T, Gaub, HE & Nash, MA (2015). Quantifying synergy, thermostability, and targeting of cellulolytic enzymes and cellulosomes with polymerization-based amplification. Anal Chem 87, 7133–7140.Google Scholar
Mandal, A & Chakrabarty, D (2015). Characterization of nanocellulose reinforced semi-interpenetrating polymer network of poly(vinyl alcohol) & polyacrylamide composite films. Carbohydr Polym 134, 240–250.Google Scholar
Nakagaito, AN & Yano, H (2004). The effect of morphological changes from pulp fiber towards nano-scale fibrillated cellulose on the mechanical properties of high-strength plant fiber based composites. Appl Phys A 78, 547–552.Google Scholar
Nigmatullin, R, Harniman, R, Gabrielli, V, Muñoz-García, JC, Khimyak, YZ, Angulo, J & Eichhorn, SJ (2018). Mechanically robust gels formed from hydrophobized cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10, 19318–19322.Google Scholar
Ogawa, Y & Putaux, J-L (2019). Transmission electron microscopy of cellulose. Part 2: Technical and practical aspects. Cellulose 26, 17–34.Google Scholar
Oksman, K, Aitomäki, Y, Mathew, AP, Siqueira, G, Zhou, Q, Butylina, S, Tanpichai, S, Zhou, X & Hooshmand, S (2016). Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Composites Part A 83, 2–18.Google Scholar
Olmstead, JA & Gray, DG (1993). Fluorescence emission from mechanical pulp sheets. J Photochem Photobiol, A 73, 59–65.Google Scholar
Pöhlker, C, Huffman, JA & Pöschl, U (2012). Autofluorescence of atmospheric bioaerosols—fluorescent biomolecules and potential interferences. Atmos Meas Tech 5, 37–71.Google Scholar
Radotić, K, Kalauzi, A, Djikanović, D, Jeremić, M, Leblanc, RM & Cerović, ZG (2006). Component analysis of the fluorescence spectra of a lignin model compound. J Photochem Photobiol, B 83, 1–10.Google Scholar
Ranby, BG (1951). Fibrous macromolecular systems. Cellulose and muscle. The colloidal properties of cellulose micelles. Discuss Faraday Soc 11, 158–164.Google Scholar
Ray, D & Sain, S (2016). In situ processing of cellulose nanocomposites. Composites, Part A 83, 19–37.Google Scholar
Saxena, A, Elder, TJ, Pan, S & Ragauskas, AJ (2009). Novel nanocellulosic xylan composite film. Composites Part B 40, 727–730.Google Scholar
Shariki, S, Liew, SY, Thielemans, W, Walsh, DA, Cummings, CY, Rassaei, L, Wasbrough, MJ, Edler, KJ, Bonné, MJ & Marken, F (2011). Tuning percolation speed in layer-by-layer assembled polyaniline–nanocellulose composite films. J Solid State Electrochem 15, 2675–2681.Google Scholar
Siqueira, G, Bras, J & Dufresne, A (2010). Cellulosic bionanocomposites: A review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers (Basel) 2, 728–765.Google Scholar
Siró, I & Plackett, D (2010). Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: A review. Cellulose 17, 459–494.Google Scholar
Stewart, S, Priore, RJ, Nelson, MP & Treado, PJ (2012). Raman imaging. Annu Rev Anal Chem 5, 337–360.Google Scholar
Tomić, S, Kokol, V, Mihajlović, D, Mirčić, A & Čolić, M (2016). Native cellulose nanofibrills induce immune tolerance in vitro by acting on dendritic cells. Sci Rep 6, 31618.Google Scholar
Yu, H, Yan, C & Yao, J (2014). Fully biodegradable food packaging materials based on functionalized cellulose nanocrystals/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanocomposites. RSC Adv 4, 59792–59802.Google Scholar
Yuan, WZ & Zhang, Y (2017). Nonconventional macromolecular luminogens with aggregation-induced emission characteristics. J Polym Sci A 55, 560–574.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Johns et al. supplementary material

Johns et al. supplementary material 1

Download Johns et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.9 MB