No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Results of Interlaboratory Test Programs to Assess the Precision of Inclusion Ratings by Methods A, C and D of ASTM E45
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 July 2016
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS1431927616010564/resource/name/firstPage-S1431927616010564a.jpg)
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 22 , Supplement S3: Proceedings of Microscopy & Microanalysis 2016 , July 2016 , pp. 1944 - 1945
- Copyright
- © Microscopy Society of America 2016
References
References:
[1]
Rinman, B., et al., “Inclusion Chart for the Estimation of Slag Inclusions in Steel,” Jernkontoret, Stockholm, Sweden, Uppsala (1936), 24 pages.Google Scholar
[3]
Vander Voort, G. F.
“Inclusion Measurement,” Metallography as a Quality Control Tool. Plenum Press, NY
(1980). pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
[4]
Vander Voort, G. F. & Golden, J. F.
Microstructural Science (Vol.
. 10
, (Elsevier Science Publishing Co., NY)
(1982). pp. 277–290.Google Scholar
[5]
Forget, C.
Micon 90: Advances in Video Technology for Microstructural Control. ASTM STP 1094, ASTM, Philadelphia
(1991). pp. 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar