Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T19:47:54.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Plasmalemmal Vesicles on the HDL-Mediated Cholesterol Efflux in Aortic Endothelial Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

W. T. Chao
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
V. C. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Get access

Abstract

It is well-known that high-density lipoprotein (HDL) mediates the transport of cholesterol from peripheral tissues to liver through “reverse cholesterol transport” for metabolism. However there is considerable debate about the mechanisms by which HDL removes excess cholesterol from cells. Two different pathways have been suggested: (i) a docking receptor promots cholesterol translocation, or (ii) a receptor mediates intracellular endosomal pathway termed “retroendocytosis“. Our previous studies have indicated that the removal of cholesterol from aortic endothelial and smooth muscle cells in the presence of HDL is facilitated by plasmalemmal vesicles. in this study, our emphasis is on the ultrastructural changes of cholesterol-loaded endothelial cells after incubated with HDL at different time intervals. Furthermore, the mechanism of HDL-mediated cholesterol efflux by cultured aortic endothelial cells is investigated by immunoelectrophoresis.

Confluent monolayers of endothelial cells were incubated in cholesterol DMEM medium for 48 hr.

Type
Pathology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Stein, O. et al., Atherosclerosis. 144 (1999) 285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lin, G. et al., Atherosclerosis. 149 (2000) 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Rogler, G. et al., Digestion. 61 (2000) 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar