Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T02:30:24.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Standardization and Metrology for Efficiency and Reliability in Microbeam Analysis - No pain, no gain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2015

Vasile-Dan Hodoroaba
Affiliation:
BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing, Division 6.8 Surface Analysis and Interfacial Chemistry, 12200 Berlin, Germany
Ryna B. Marinenko
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Materials Measurement Science Division, Microanalysis Research Group, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
Mike Matthews
Affiliation:
17 Circuit Lane, RG30 3HB Reading, Great Britain
Jiang Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute of Chemistry, SAC, #2 Zhong Guan Cun Bei Yi Jie Beijing, 100190, China

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2015 

References

[1] ISO/IEC 17025 (2005). General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneve.Google Scholar
[2] http://www.iso.org (Standard developments / Technical Committees / ISO/TC 202 Microbeam analysis).Google Scholar
[4] Hodoroaba, V-D, et al, Microsc. Microanal 20(Suppl 3), 2014, p. 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] ISO/IEC Guide 98-3: 2008. Uncertainty of measurement Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995), Geneva: Internat. Org. Stds, 101 pp.Google Scholar