Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T14:20:26.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Digital Imaging in K-12 Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

James Ekstrom
James Ekstrom*
Affiliation:
Phillips Exeter Academy, http://science.exeter.edu/jekstrom/default.html

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

K-12 instruction in biology has traditionally taken a very descriptive approach. This is in marked contrast to quantitative as well as qualitative way of looking at things in physics and chemistry. This qualitative/descriptive approach even extends into the iaboratory portion of the biological course. One way to introduce a more quantitative approach is in the microscopy portion of the biology curriculum. Because cellular structure is primarily a microscopic province It makes sense to introduce students to the different microscopic tools such as TEM and SEM, as well as the light microscope that are used to investigate cell structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy Today , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , November 2002 , pp. 32 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2002

References

References:

[1] Eksirom, J. http://science.exeter.edu/jekslrom/WEB/CELLS/Epith/Epitri.html Google Scholar
[2] Ekstrom, J. Cell Structure Study, The Science Teacher Vol 67, No. 7, October 2000 http://science.exeter.edu/jekstrom/nsta/elodea.html Google Scholar
[3] Ekstrom, J. Slicing for Biology, The Science Teacher Vol 68, No. 2, Feb. 2001Google Scholar
[4] Marilee Sellers NAU “Ugly Bug” Contest http://www.nau.edu/%7Eelectron/bug/99/99.html Google Scholar
[5] Oklahoma Microscopy Society “Ugly Bug” contest http://www.uglybug.org/ Google Scholar
[6] New Hampshire “Ugly Bug” contest http://science.exeter.edu/jekstrom/BUGS/B.htm Google Scholar