Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:02:03.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Do Pathologists Use The Electron Microscope Enough?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Stephen W. Carmichael*
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The compound light microscope has been used by patholo gists for centuries, and remains the common tool for making a diagnosis. A half century ago, the electron microscope (EM) was introduced, and has aiso been proven to be a valuable, but expensive, tool. In the meantime, other tools and methods have worked their way into the pathologists’ armamentarium, with immunohistochemical, genetic, and molecular techniques being the most obvious examples. Josep Lloreta-Truil, Lola Ferrer, Teresa Ribalta, Marco Pavesi, and Sergio Serrano examined the literature to determine the frequency and appropriateness with which pathologists use the EM in their studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

References

2. Lloreta-Trull, J., Ferrer, L., Ribalta, T., Pavesi, M., and Serrano, S., electron microscopy in pathology articles; A retrospective appraisal, Ultrastructural Path. 24:105-108, 2000.Google Scholar
3. American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Human Pathology, and Modem Pathology Google Scholar