Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T10:26:53.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Gas Type on Beam Scatter

X-ray Analysis in the Low Vacuum SEM (Part 2 of 3)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Don Chernoff*
Affiliation:
Small World, Inc.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Last month I addressed the phenomena of beam scatter in the environmental and low vacuum SEM. In that article I covered how beam scatter is affected by chamber pressure, working distance, and accelerating voltage. To briefly summarize, beam scatter becomes worse at higher chamber pressure, longer working distance, and lower accelerating voltages. As the beam scatters, electrons strike the sample some distance away from the primary beam and as a result, generate X-rays from unwanted areas of the sample. It is advantageous for the analyst to keep beam scatter to a minimum to reduce the generation of these X-ray signals. Under conditions of high chamber pressure, long working distance, and low accelerating voltage, it is possible for electrons from the beam to strike the sample on the order of a millimeter or more from the primary beam.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1998

References

Small World: Electron Flight Simulator, version E (1997) http://www.small-world.net (703) 849-1492Google Scholar
Joy, David; Environmental SEM Monte Carlo Simulation (1997)Google Scholar
Philips Electron Optics and Robert Johnson Associates: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy, An Introduction to ESEM (1996)Google Scholar
Stowe, Sally, and Robinson, Viv: The Use of Helium Gas to Reduce Beam Scattering in High Vapour Pressure Scanning Electron Microscopy Applications, Scanning Vol.20, January 1998 Google Scholar
Wight, Scott: Beam Size in the Environmental SEM: A Comparison of Model and Experimental Data, Surface and Microanalysis Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899Google Scholar