Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T11:16:30.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

β-Ferric Oxyhydroxide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

A. L. Mackay
A. L. Mackay*
Affiliation:
Birkbeck College Crystallographic Laboratory, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The crystallographic properties of the hydrated iron oxide obtained by the hydrolysis of FeCl3 are described. The characterizing X-ray powder pattern can be indexed on a tetragonal unit cell with a 10·48 and c 3·023 Å. This cell is shown to contain eight formula units of FeOOH but Cl- or other anions are necessary for the crystallization of the material The structure is that of hollandite or α-MnO2. The unit cell has been confirmed by electron diffraction from single crystals having dimensions about 5000 × 500 × 500 Å. and twinning, which produces hexagonal stars, has been studied. On heating, the structure breaks down and recrystallizes as α-Fe2O2, probably with an intermediate stage involving a spinel phase.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 32 , Issue 250 , September 1960 , pp. 545 - 557
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernal, (J.D.), Dasgupta, (D.R.), and Mackay, (A.L.), 1959. Clay Mineral Bull., vol. 4, no. 21, p. 15.Google Scholar
Braun, (P.B.), 1957. Philips Res. Rept., vol 12, p. 491.Google Scholar
Byström, (A.) and Bystrsm, (A.M.), 1950. Acta Cryst., vol. 3, p. 146.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, (D.R.) and Mackay, (A.L.), 1959. Journ. Phys. Soc. Japan, vol 14, no. 7, p. 932.Google Scholar
Heller, (W.), Kratky, (O.), and Nowotny, (H.), 1936. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 202, p. 1171.Google Scholar
Hilpert, (R.S.), Maier, (K.H.), and Hoffmann, (A.), 1938. Ber. deut. chem. Gesell., ser. B,' vol. 71, p. 2676.Google Scholar
Hofer, (L. J. E.), Peebles, (W.C.), and Dieter, (W.E.), 1946. Journ. Amer. Chem. Soc., vol. 68, p. 1953.Google Scholar
Keller, (G.), 1948. Thesis, Bern.Google Scholar
Kratky, (O.) and Nowotny, (H.), 1938. Zeits. Krist., vol. 100, p. 356.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, (R.C.), 1952. Problems of clay and laterite genesis. Amer. Inst. Mining Met. Eng., New York, p. 65.Google Scholar
Meldau, (R.), 1957. Arch. Eisenhiittenwesen, vol. 28, p. 615.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, (B.), 1960. Acts Cryst., vol. 13, p. 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoreau, (J.) and Verhulst, (J.), 1938. Bull. C1. Sci. Acad. Roy. Belgique, ser. 5, vol. 24, p. 716 [M.A. 7-389].Google Scholar
Weiser, (H.B.) and Milligan, (W.O.), 1935. Journ. Physical Chem., vol. 39, p. 25.-Google Scholar