Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T13:18:14.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metasomatism in the basalt of Haddenrig quarry near Kelso and the veining of the rocks exposed there

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

S.I. Tomkeieff
S.I. Tomkeieff*
Affiliation:
King's College, University of Durham, Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Haddenrig (Haddon Rig) quarry is situated three miles east of Kelso in Roxburghshire, near the road from Kelso to Mindrum in Northumberland. The rock quarried is marked on the Geological Survey Map (Scotland, Sheet 26) as a basalt intrusive into the Lower Carboniferous lavas (Kelso traps). The absence of exposed contacts excludes any direct field evidence of its intrusive character, but the appearance of the fresh basalt from the quarry suggests that it belongs to a sill or a plug, as it is in many ways similar to other intrusive basalts of the Kelso district. The evidence of the orientation of the felspar laths in the basalt is not entirely conclusive. With the exception of the northern part of the quarry where the orientation is vertical, elsewhere it is more or less horizontal. This suggests a sill. The vertical orientation of laths in the northern part of the quarry may be due either to the presence of a feeding channel or to eddies in the sill.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 26 , Issue 173 , June 1941 , pp. 45 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bailey, (E. B.) and Grabham, (G. W.). Albitization of basic plagioclase felspars. Geol. Mag. London, 1909, dec. 5, vol. 6, pp. 250–259.Google Scholar
2. Bastin, (E. S.). Hydrothermal alteration in the rocks of Pigeon Point, Minnesota. Journ. Geol. Chicago, 1938, vol. 46, pp. 1058–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brögger, (W. C.). Die Eruptivgesteine des Kristianiagebietes. IV. Das Fengebiet in Telemark, Norwegen. Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift. I. Math.-nat. Kl., Kristiania, 1921, no. 9. [M.A. 2–165.]Google Scholar
4. Brögger, (W. C.). Die Eruptivgesteine des Oslogehietes. V. Der grosse Hurumvulkan. Skrift. Norske Vidensk. Akad., I. Math.-nat. Kl., Oslo, 1931, no. 6.Google Scholar
5. Brongniart, (A.). Classification et caractères minéralogiques des roches homogènes et hétérogènes. Paris, 1827.Google Scholar
6. Butler, (B. S.). Influence of the replaced rock on replacement minerals associated with ore deposits. Econ. Geol., 1932, vol. 27, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
7. Charlewood, (G.H.). The nature and occurrence of carbonates in veins. Econ. Geol., 1935, vol. 30, pp. 502–517.Google Scholar
8. Day, (T. C.). Igneous intrusive phenomena at Upper Whitfield, near Macbiehill; and at Ravelig and Kaimes Hill quarries, Balerno. Trans. Edinburgh Geol. Soc., 1920, vol. 11, pp. 14–17. [M.A. 1–91]Google Scholar
9. Day, (T. C.). Metasomatism in basalt near Eel Burn, North Berwick. Ibid., 1928, vol. 12, pp. 117–121.Google Scholar
10. Day, (T. C.). An igneous dyke in the quartz-banakite of Bangly quarry near Haddington. Ibid., 1930, vol. 12, pp. 256–259. [M.A. 4–400.].Google Scholar
11. Dewey, (H.) and Flett, (J. S.). On some British pillow-lavas and the rocks associated with them. Geol. Mag. London, 1911, dec. 5, vol. 8, pp. 202–209, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Eskola, (P.), Vuoristo, (U.), and Rankama, (K.). An experimental illustration of the spilite reaction. Compt. Rend. Soc. Géol. Finlande, 1935, no. 9. [M.A. 6–351.]Google Scholar
13. Gillson, (J. L.). Petrography of the Pioche district, Lincoln County, Nevada. Prof. Paper U.S. Geol. Surv., 1929, no. 158-D).Google Scholar
14. Hawkes, (L.) and Smythe, (J. A.). Ankerites from the Northumberland coal-field. Min. Mag., 1935, vol. 24, pp. 65–75.Google Scholar
15. Knopf, (A.). The mother lode system of California. Prof. Paper U.S. Geol. Surv., 1929, no. 157.Google Scholar
16. Reynolds, (D. L.). Demonstration in petrogenesis from Kiloran Bay, Colonsay. I. The transfusion of quartzite. Min. Mag., 1936, vol. 24, pp. 367–407.Google Scholar
17. Ross, (C. S.). Origin of the copper deposits of the Ducktown type in the southern Appalachian region. Prof. Paper U.S. Geol. Surv., 1935, no. 179.Google Scholar
18. Sargent, (H. C.) On a spilitic facies of Lower Carboniferous lava-flows in Derbyshire. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, 1917, vol. 73, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar
19. Schwartz, (G. M.). Hydrothermal alteration of igneous rocks. Bull. Geol. Soc. America, 1939, vol. 50, pp. 181–238.Google Scholar
20. Singewald, (Q. D.). Alteration as an end phase of igneous intrusion in sills on Loveland Mountain, Park County, Colorado. Journ. Geol. Chicago, 1932, vol. 40, pp. 16–29.Google Scholar
21. Tomkeieff, (S. I.). Lower Carboniferous igneous rocks. In Contributions to the geology of Northumberland and Durham. Proc. Geol. Assoc. London, 1931, vol. 42, pp. 259–261, analyses p. 266.Google Scholar
22. Tomkeieff, (S. I.). Petrochemistry of the Scottish Carboniferons-Permian igneous rocks. Bull. Volcanologique. Napoli, 1937, ser. 2, vol. 1, pp. 59–87. [M.A. 7–187.]Google Scholar