Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:00:53.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sedimentary analcime rocks and sodium-rich gneisses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

D. S. Coombs
D. S. Coombs*
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Otago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

As indicated by Tilley (1925), albite-rich schists and gneisses can inherit their abnormal chemical characteristics from sediments that are proving to be by no means rare. They may be rich in detrital sodic plagioclase or they may contain authigenie analcime. Some sedimentary analcime rocks (‘analcimolites’) carry normative nepheline and so offer potential parent rocks for nepheline-bearing gneisses provided that, in these gneisses, SiO2 ⩾ (4Na2O+6K2O) in molecular proportions. The chemistry and occurrence of soda-rich sediments are reviewed. Some New Zealand occurrences are newly described and hitherto unpublished analyses are presented for porphyroblastic albite schist and felsitic volcanic arenite from Otago, and for analcime-rich sediments from four localities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 34 , Issue 268 , 1965 , pp. 144 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, (J.L.), 1944. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., vol. 28, p. 1455.Google Scholar
Bowes, (D.R.), 1954. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Aust., vol. 77, p. 182.Google Scholar
Bradley, (W.H.), 1929. U.S. Geol. Surv., Prof. Paper, vol. 158-A, p. 1.Google Scholar
Bradley, (W.H.), 1931. Ibid., vol. 168, p. 1.Google Scholar
Bradley, (W.H.), 1959. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., vol. 43, p. 1072.Google Scholar
Bur'yanova, (F.Z.), 1954. Doklady Akad. Nauk, S.S.S.R., vol. 98, p. 261.Google Scholar
Bur'Yanova, (F.Z.), 1960. Izvest. Akad. Hauk, S.S.S.R., Ser. Geol., no. 6, p. 71.Google Scholar
Condon, (M.A.), 1959. Proc. Aust. Inst. Mining and Metallurgy, no. 189, p. 47.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), 1954. Trans. Roy. Soc. N.Z., vol. 82, p. 65.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), 1961. Austr. Journ. Sci., vol. 24, p. 203.Google Scholar
Coombs, (D.S.), Ellis, (A.J.), Fyfe, (W.S.), and Taylor, (A.J.), 1959. Geochim. Cosmoehim. Acta, vol. 17, p. 53.Google Scholar
Deffeyes, (K.S.), 1959. Journ. Sed. Pet., vol. 29, p. 602.Google Scholar
Dzotsenidze, (G.S.) and Skhirtladze, (N.I.), 1953. Voprosy Petrog. i Mineral., Akad. Nauk, S.S.S.R., vol. 1, p. 301.Google Scholar
Engel, (C.G.), 1953. Bull. Geol. Soe. Amer., vol. 64, p. 1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulbrandsen, (R. A.), and Cressman, (E.R.), 1960. Journ. Geol., vol. 68, p. 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummer, (W.K.), and Burr, (S.V.), 1946. Ibid., vol. 64, p. 137.Google Scholar
Hay, (R.L.), 1963. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., vol. 74, p. !281.Google Scholar
Hay, (R.L.), and Moiola, (R.J.), 1963. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spee, Paper, no. 76, p. 76.Google Scholar
Hovten, (F. B. Van), 1960. Journ. Geol., vol. 68, p. 666.Google Scholar
Jones, (K.A.), 1961. Geol. Mag., vol. 98, P. 41.Google Scholar
Joulia, (F.), Bonifas, (M.), Camez, (T.), Mii,Lot, (O.), and Weil, (R.), 1959. Notes Serv. Géol. Prospection Miniere, Dakar, no. 4, 45 pp.Google Scholar
Keller, (W. D.), 1952. Journ. Sed. Pet., vol. 22, p. 70.Google Scholar
Keller, (W. D.), 1953. Ibid., vol 23, p. 10.Google Scholar
Kolbin, (M.F.) and Pimburgskaya, (M.I.), 1955. Doklady Akad. Nauk, S.S.S.R., vol. 100, p. 155.Google Scholar
Lefsersonne, (J.), 1960. Ann. soc. geol. Belg. Bull., vol. 84, p. 21.[CA55, 20814-d].Google Scholar
Mckie, (D.), 1958. Records Geol. Surv. Tunganyika, vol. 6, p. 87.Google Scholar
Milton, (C.), Chao, (E. C. T.), Fattey, (J.J.), and Mrose, (M.E.), 1960. Proc. 21st Int. Geol. Congress, pt. xxi, p. 171.Google Scholar
Moiola, (R.J.) and Ham, (R. L.), 1963. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spee. Paper, no. 76, p. 215.Google Scholar
Müller, (G.), 1961. Beitr. Mineral. u. Petrog., vol. 8, p. l .Google Scholar
Petttuohn, (F.J.) and Bastron, (H.), 1959. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., vol. 70, p. 593.Google Scholar
Pichamuthu, (C.S.), 1960. Bull. Mysore Geologists’ Assn., no. 19, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Reed, (J.J.), 1957. N.Z. Geol. Surv. Bull., N.s., no. 57.Google Scholar
Reynolds, (D.L.), 1942. Roy. Irish Aead. Proe., sect. B, vol. 48, p. 43.Google Scholar
Ross, (C.S.), 1928. Amer. Min., vol. 13, p. 195.Google Scholar
Ross, (C.S.), 1941. Ibid., vol. 26, p. 627.Google Scholar
Saha, (P.), 1959. Ibid., vol. 44, p. 300.Google Scholar
Taliaferro, (N.L.), 1942. Bull. Amer. Ass. Petrol. Geol., vol. 27, p. 109.Google Scholar
Teruggi, (M.E.), 1962. Res. Mus. de la Plata (N.S.), Soc. Geol., vol. 5, p. 193.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C.E.), 1925. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol 81, p. 100.Google Scholar
Tilley, (C.E.), 1958. Ibid., vol. 113, p. 323.Google Scholar
Turner, (F.J.) and Hutton, (C.O.), 194]. Trans. Roy. Soe. N.Z., vol 71, p. 223.Google Scholar
Vanderstappen, (R.) and Verbeek, (T.), 1959. Bulh Soc. belge Geoh, paléontol et hydrol., vol. 68, p. 417.[CA-54, 19325-C].Google Scholar
Vernon, (R.H.), 1961. Commonwealth Sci. and Ind. Res. Organization, Australia, Mineragraphic Investigations Tech. Paper no. 3.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, (J. F. G.) and Whetten, (J.T.). (In press.)Google Scholar