Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T22:53:10.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chlorophaeite in the dolerites (tholeiites) of Dalmahoy and Kaimes Hills, Edinburgh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Robert Campbell
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Edinburgh
James W. Lunn
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Edinburgh

Extract

The name chlorophaeite was given by John Macceulloch in 1819 to a mineral exhibiting striking colour change on exposure which he found at Craig nan Stàrdean (=Sgùrr Mòr) in the island of Rum. Sixty years later Professor Heddle visited the type locality and redescribed the mineral, giving for the first time chemical analyses. He also noted an occurrence of the mineral in Canna. In 1908 A. Harker showed that the rock which contained the chlorophaeite belongs to the mugearites.

Records of chlorophaeite arc not always trustworthy since the term has been used somewhat loosely. Professor Heddle (loc. cit., p. 88) confirmed the occurrence at the Giant's Causeway, Co. Antrim, first recorded by Greg and Lettsom in their Manual of Mineralogy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 435 note 1 Macculloeh, J., A description of the Western Isles of Scotland, 1819, vol. 1, p. 504 Google Scholar.

Page 435 note 2 Heddle, M. F., Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1880, vol. 29, p. 84 Google Scholar.

Page 435 note 3 Harker, A., The geology of the small isles of Inverness-shire. Mem. Geol. Survey Scotland, 1908, p. 132.Google Scholar

Page 435 note 4 Allport, S., Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, 1874, vol. 30, p. 529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

Page 435 note 5 Dana, J. D., System of Mineralogy, 5th edit., 1868, p. 510 Google Scholar.

Page 435 note 6 Clough, C. T., Geology of Cowal. Mem. Geol. Survey Scotland, 1897, pp. 130, 170Google Scholar.

Page 435 note 7 Sollas, W. J. and McHenry, A., Trans. Roy. Irish Acad., 1896, vol. 30, p. 742 Google Scholar.

Page 736 note 1 Hardman, E. T., Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., 1878, ser. 2, vol. 3, p. 16l Google Scholar ; Rep. Brit. Assoc. (48th meeting, Dublin, 1878), 1879, p. 542.

Page 736 note 2 Geikie, A., Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 1879, vol. 29, p. 518.Google Scholar

Page 736 note 3 Teall, J. J. H., British Petrography, 1888, p. 190 Google Scholar

Page 736 note 4 Flett, J. S., The neighbourhood of Edinburgh. Mem. Geol. Survey Scotland, 1910, p. 291.Google Scholar

Page 437 note 1 Lacroix, A., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., 1885, vol. 8, p. 432.Google Scholar

Page 438 note 1 See George, W. O., The relation of the physical properties of natural glasses to their chemical composition. Journ. Geol., 1924, vol. 32, p. 353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

Page 438 note 2 Rogers, A. F., Journ. Geol., 1917, vol. 25, p. 518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. [Min. Abstr., vol. 1, p. 378.]

Page 439 note 1 See Scott, A., Fourth Report on Colloid Chemistry, Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 1922, p. 214 Google Scholar. [Min. Abstr., vol. 2, p. 297.

Page 439 note 2 See A. Scott, loc. cit., p. 216.

Page 440 note 1 Tertiary and post-Tertiary geology of Mull. Mem. Geol. Survey Scotland, 1924, p. 285.