Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:28:02.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Garnet-quartz intergrowths in graphitic pelites: the role of the fluid phase

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Kevin W. Burton
Kevin W. Burton*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Garnets with an unusual inclusion pattern of cylindrical quartz intergrowths have been found to develop exclusively in the presence of graphite. The intergrowths consist of quartz rods, 1–5 µm in diameter, originating at the sector-zone interfaces in the garnet with the long axes normal to the crystal faces. The lattice orientation and continuity of the quartz suggests that the interphase boundaries between the quartz and garnet are epitaxially related and that new material was added to the tube as the crystal face of the garnet grew. In the presence of a C-O-H fluid, at the temperatures and pressures recorded, (P = 6.5 kbar, T = 500°C), the amount of CO2 present restricts the solubility of SiO2 in the intergranular fluid phase, where the oxygen fugacity (fo2) is below the Quartz-fayalite-magnetite (QFM) buffer, and within the stability field of graphite. The reduced solubility will lower the concentration of SiO2 in solution, and hence restrict its ease of transport via the fluid, resulting in an excess of SiO2at the site of garnet growth. Under such conditions the SiO2 is incorporated in the growing garnet in the form of the cylindrical quartz intergrowths.

Keywords

garnetquartzintergrowthsgraphitic pelites
Type
Silicate mineralogy
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 50 , Issue 358 , December 1986 , pp. 611 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ.

References

Andersen, T.B. (1984) Mineral. Mag, 48, 21-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billet, M.F. (1984) Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of London. Boyle, A.P., Hansen, T.S., and Mason, R. (1986) Proc. Uppsala. Caledonide Symposium. Wiley, New York (in press).Google Scholar
Buddington, A.F., and Lindsley, D.H. (1964) J. Petrol, 5, 310-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, W.K., Carbrera, N., and Frank, F.C. (1951) Phil. Trans. R. Soc, 243, 299-358.Google Scholar
Carmichael, D.M. (1970) J. Petrol, 11, 147-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, B. (1964) Principles of Solidification. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Chinner, G.A. (1960) J. Petrology, 1, 178-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eugster, H.P. (1959) In Researches in Geochemistry (P. H. Abelson, ed.) John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Ferry, J.M., and Spear, F.S. (1978) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol, 66, 113-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, G.W. (1978) Geochim, Cosmochim. Ada, 42, 1035-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, F.C. (1951) Ada. Crystallogr, 4, 497-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, B.M. (1966) Rev. Geophys, 4, 223-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, B.R. (1979) Am. J. Sci, 279, 1033-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghent, E.D., and Stout, M.Z. (1981) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol, 76, 92-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, H.J. (1967) Am. Mineral, 62, 1669-80.Google Scholar
Harker, A. (1939) Metamorphism. 2nd edn., Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Henley, K.J. (1970) Nor. Geol. Tiddskr, 50, 97-136.Google Scholar
Hodges, K.V., and Spear, F.S. (1978) Am. Mineral, 67, 1118-34.Google Scholar
Hollister, L.S. (1969) Am. J. Sci, 267, 352-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollister, L.S. and Bence, A.E. (1967) Science, 158, 1053-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, J.R. (1981) In Short Course in Fluid Inclusions Applications to Petrology(L. S. Hollister and M. L. Crawford, eds.)Google Scholar
Kerrick, D.M. (1974) Am. Mineral, 59, 729-62.Google Scholar
Klapper, H. (1980) In Characterization of crystal growth defects by X-ray methods (B. K. Tanner and K. Bowen, eds.). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lamb, W., and Valley, J.W. (1984) Nature, 312, 56-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomis, T.P. (1982) Can. Mineral, 20, 411-23.Google Scholar
Miyashiro, A. (1964) Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 28, 717-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novak, J.M., and Holdaway, M.J. (1981) Am. Mineral, 66, 51-69.Google Scholar
Novgorodov, P.G. (1975) Geokhimica.no. 10, 1484-9.Google Scholar
Ohmoto, H., and Kerrick, D. (1977) Am. J. Sci. Ill, 1013-44.Google Scholar
Porter, D.A., and Easterling, K.E. (1981) Phase Transformations in Metals and Alloys. Van Nostrand, Rheinhold.Google Scholar
Powell, R., and Powell, M. (1977) Mineral. Mag, 41, 257-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumble, D. (1978) . Petrol, 19, 317-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, J.W. (1958) Liquid Metals and Solidification. American Society for Metals.Google Scholar
Rutter, J.W. and Chalmers, B. (1965) Can. J. Phys, 31, 15-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shettel, D.L. (1973) Eos, 54, 480.Google Scholar
Skippen, G.B. (1977) In Application of thermodynamics to petrology and ore deposits(H. J. Greenwood, ed.). Mineral. Assoc. Can. Short Course Handbook, 66-83.Google Scholar
Spry, A. (1969) Metamorphic Textures. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.B. (1970) Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 34, 529-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Enckevort, W.J.P., Rosmalen, R.S.V., Klapper, H., and van der Linden, W.H. (1982) J. Cryst. Growth, 60, 67-78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, J.V., and Orville, P.M. (1983) Am. Mineral, 68, 731-41.Google Scholar
Walther, J.V., and Orville, P.M. and Wood, B.J. (1984) Contrib. Mineral Petrol, 88, 246-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodsworth, G.J. (1977) Can. Mineral, 15, 230-42.Google Scholar
Yardley, B.W.D. (1977) Am. Mineral, 62, 793-800.Google Scholar