Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T08:15:52.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leucite-Na-feldspar incompatibility: an experimental study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Alok K. Gupta  and
Alan D. Edgar
Alok K. Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Alan D. Edgar
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Phase relations at atmospheric pressure in the pseudobinary join KAlSi2O6 (Lc)-NaAlSi3O8(Ab) and in the pseudoternary join Lc-Ab-CaAl2Si2O8(An) indicate that leucite is in-compatible with Na-feldspar. In the former join leucite can exist with an alkali feldspar of maximum albite content Ab54. In the Lc-Ab-An join, leucite only coexists with ternary feldspars with high An contents (approximately An50). Under PH2O conditions leucites may only coexist with alkali feldspars even poorer in Ab than those found at atmospheric pressure. Rare occurrences of coexisting leucite and Na-feldspar in nature have probably not crystallized directly from a melt but may have formed by a process of alkali ion exchange; or they may be unstable assemblages. No support can be found for the suggestions based on thermochemical calculations that albite and leucite are compatible at high temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 40 , Issue 312 , December 1975 , pp. 377 - 384
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Institut für Mineralogie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-463 Bochum, Germany

References

Bowen, (N. L.), 1913. Amer. Journ. Sci. ser., 4, 35. 577-99.Google Scholar
Fudali, (R. F.), 1963. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 74, 1101-25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, (A. K.), 1972. Amer. Min. 57, 1242-59.Google Scholar
Hamilton, (D. C.) and Mackenzie, (W. S.), 1960. Journ. Petrol. 1, 56-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, (W. S.) and Rahman, (S.), 1968. Contr. Min. Pert. 19, 339-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashiro, (A.), 1960. Jap. Journ. Geol. Geogr. 31, 71-8.Google Scholar
Orville, (P. M.), 1967. Amer. Min. 52, 58-86.Google Scholar
Scrlairer, (J. F.), 1950. Journ. Geol. 58, 512-17.Google Scholar
Scrlairer, (J. F.), 1957. Journ. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 40, 215-35.Google Scholar
Scrlairer, (J. F.), 1959. In The Techniques of Physico-Chemical Measurements at High Temperatures, London (Butterworth Sci. Pub.) 117-34.Google Scholar
Scrlairer, (J. F.), and Bowen, (N. L.), 1947. Bull. Soc. Geol. Finland, 20, 67-87.Google Scholar
Shand, (S. J.), 1947. Eruptive rocks. New York (Hafner Publishing Co. Inc.).Google Scholar
Smith, (J. V.) and Tuttle, (O. F.), 1957. Amer. Journ. Sci. 255, 282-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, (O. F.) and Bowen, (N. L.), 1958. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 74.Google Scholar