Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T19:52:45.330Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mineral reactions at a peridotite-gneiss contact, Jotunheimen, Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

W. L. Griffin
W. L. Griffin*
Affiliation:
Mineralogisk-Geologisk Museum, Oslo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The assemblage aluminous pyroxenes+ spinel forms reaction zones between olivine-rich and plagioclase-rich layers in the Jotunheimen complex. These zones have probably formed by cooling from high T at moderate P, passing through the ol + plag → pyroxenes + spinel reaction. The absence of garnet, which would be expected to form upon further cooling, is attributed to interruption of the cooling history by rapid uplift. This uplift is demonstrated by symplectitic breakdown of aluminous pyroxenes, with expulsion of Ts and Acm, to yield low-Al pyroxenes, spinel, and plagioclase. The uplift must be Precambrian, and suggests that the Jotun rocks were involved in rapid vertical movements long before the Caledonian thrusting took place.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 296 , December 1971 , pp. 435 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Publication no. 27 in the Norwegian Geotraverse Project.

2

Present address: Institut for Geologi, Blindern, Oslo.

References

Battey, (M.H.), 1960. Rept. XXIlnternat. Geol. Congress, pt. 13, 198.Google Scholar
Battey, (M.H.), 1965. Min. Mag. 34, 35.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, (V.M.), 1916. Videnskaps Skrifter, Oslo. L Mat.-naturv. KI, no. 2.Google Scholar
Green, (D.H.) and Hibberson, (W.), 1970. Lithos, 3, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, (D.H.) and Hibberson, (W.), and Ringwood, (A.E.), 1967. Contr. Min. Petr. 15, 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, (W.L.), 1971.. Journ. Petrology (in press).Google Scholar
Griffin, (W.L.), 1971.. Mem. Geol. Soc. Amer. (in press).Google Scholar
Griffin, (W.L.), and Heier, (K.S.), 1969. Contr. Min. Petr. 23, 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, (J.F.), 1966. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearboo. 65, 234.Google Scholar
Kushiro, (I.), 1969. Min. Soc. Amer. Spec. Publ. 2, 179.Google Scholar
Kushiro, (I.), and Yoder, (H.S.), 1966. Journ. Petrolog. 7, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvale, (A.), 1960. XXl lnt. Geol. Congr., Guide to Excurs. A7 and C4.Google Scholar
Loeschke, (J.) and Nickelsen, (R.P.), 1968. Neues. Jahrb. Geol. Paliiont., Abh. 131, 337.Google Scholar
Priem, (H. N. A.), 1968. Z.W.V. Laborat. voor Isotope Geol. Progress Report.Google Scholar
Ramberg, (I.B.) and Gronlie, (G.), 1969. Bull. Geofis. Theor. Applic. 11, 21-9.Google Scholar
Smithson, (S.B.) and Ramberg, (I.B.), 1970. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 81, 1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar