Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T17:30:51.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Petrological aspects of the correlation between potash content of orogenic magmas and earthquake depth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. Grant Cawthorn
R. Grant Cawthorn*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of the Witwatersrand, Milner Park, Johannesburg 2001, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The petrological interpretation of the variation of K2O content with depth to the Benioff zone in orogenic magmas is complicated by several factors: (1) Magmas may not be true primary liquids but have under-gone differentiation. K2O contents, at a specific SiO2 level, will depend upon the SiO2 content of the parental magma and the natureof the crystallizing phases more than on original K2O content. (2) The depth to the Benioff zone may not give a true reflection of the depth of melting. Magmas may not be derived from the uppermost layer of subducted oceanic crust but rather the overlying upper mantle. Earthquakes may not occur in the uppermost layer of the subducted plate, but in its colder, central parts. Hence, earthquake depth may not be related to the source of the magma. (3) It is difficult to envisage how the temporal increase in K2O may occur in certain areas (e.g. Aleutian I., Fiji) if it is primarily controlled by the depth to the Benioff zone.

There may be some correlation between K2O content of magmas and earthquake depth, but its cause is difficult to determine. None of the existing explanations is entirely satisfactory, and it is suggested that varying degrees of fractional crystallization may play an important role in controlling K2O contents.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 41 , Issue 318 , June 1977 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, (D. L.), 1970. Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 3, 85.Google Scholar
Best, (M. G.), 1975. Geology, 3, 429.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billington, (S.) and Isacks, (B. L.), 1975. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, (A. L.), 1973. Tectonophysics, 17, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, (M. S.) and O'Hara, (M. J.), 1975. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 9, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, (I. S. E.), Turner, (F. J.), and Verhoogen, (J.), 1974. Igneous Petrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 739 PP.Google Scholar
Cawthorn, (R. G.) and O'Hara, (M. J.), 1976. Am. J. Sci. 276, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, (K. G.) and Jamieson, (B. G.), 1974. J. Petrol. 15, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delong, (S. E.), 1974. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 38, 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, (W. R.), 1968. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 2261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, (W. R.), 1975. Geology, 3, 53–56.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, (W. R.) and Hatherton, (T.), 1967. Science, 157, 801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, (E. R.), 1971. Science, 173, 1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, (A. E. G.), Engel, (C. G.), and Havens, (R. G.), 1965. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 76, 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyfe, (W. S.) and McBirney, (A. R.), 1975. Am. J. Sci. 275-A, 285.Google Scholar
Gast, (P. W.), 1968. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 32, 1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, (J. B.), 1970. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 27, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, (D. H.), 1972. Tectonophysics, 13, 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, (T. H.) and Ringwood, (A. E.), 1968. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 18, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, (D. H.), and Ringwood, (A. E.), 1967. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatherton, (T.), 1969. N.Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 12, 436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, (J. R.) and Ford, (C. E.), 1975. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 25, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, (A.), 1916. Q. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 72, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, (B. G.) and Clarke, (D. B.), 1970. J. Petrol. 11, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakes, (P.) and Smith, (I. E.), 1970. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 28, 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakes, (P.) and White, (A. J. R.), 1969. Tectonophysics, 8, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, (H.), 1950. Geol. Soc. Am., Bull. 61, 957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, (H.), 1959. Bull, volcanol. 20, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuno, (H.), 1967. in: Gaskell, T. F., (ed.), The Earth's Mantle: London, Academic Press, 89-109.Google Scholar
Kuno, (H.), 1968. in: Hess, H. and Poldervaart, A., Eds., Basalts. J. Wiley, New York, 2, 623.Google Scholar
Kushiro, (I.), 1972. J. Petrol. 13, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syono, (Y.) and Akimoto, (S.), 1968. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 6023.Google Scholar
Lambert, (I. B.) and Wyllie, (P. J.), 1968. Nature, 219, 1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBirney, (A. R.), 1967. Geol. Rundschau. 57, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, (B. D.) and Carmichael, (I. S. E.), 1974. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitronovas, (W.), Isacks, (B. L.), and Seeber, (L.), 1969. Bull. Seism. Soc. of Am. 59, 1115.Google Scholar
Nicholls, (I. A.) and Ringwood, (A. E.), 1972. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 17, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, (I. A.) and Ringwood 1973. J. Geol. 81, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, (D. R.) and Stoiber, (R. E.), 1973. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 6887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishikawa, (M.), Kushiro, (I.), and Uyeda, (S.), 1971. Japanese J. Geol. Geogr. 41, 41.Google Scholar
O'Hara, (M. J.), 1968. Earth-Sci. Rev. 4, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugimura, (A.), 1968. in: H. H. Hess and A. Poldervaart, Eds., Basalts. J. Wiley, New York, 537-72.Google Scholar
Sykes, (L. R.), 1966. J. Geophys. Res. 71, 2981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar