Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:25:10.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conditions of phlogopite crystallization in ultrapotassic volcanic rocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. D. Edgar  and
M. Arima
A. D. Edgar
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 5B7
M. Arima
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada N6A 5B7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phlogopite occurs as an early crystallizing mineral in many ultrapotassic lavas of basaltic affinities. Based on high-pressure experiments in lavas of these compositions, the early crystallization of phlogopite is controlled in large part by the bulk compositions of the liquids from which it crystallizes but also by the total pressure and by the aH2O, with early phlogopite forming under a narrow range of aH2O, less than that represented by H2O-saturated conditions. Variations in fO2 do not appreciably affect phlogopite crystallization but high aCO2 suppresses its crystallization. In ultrapotassic magmas, phlogopite will preferentially incorporate K2O, TiO2, MgO, and Al2O3 relative to the coexisting early silicate minerals, olivine and clinopyroxene, and thus, on fractionation of these minerals, phlogopite will be more effective in reducing these oxides in residual liquids. Phenocrysts and microphenocrysts of phlogopite in ultrapotassic lavas are directly related with respect to their K/Ti, K/Al, K/(K + Na), and Mg/(Mg + Fe) ratios. Textural relations suggest phlogopite may form by reaction relationships involving liquid with olivine, and/or clinopyroxene. Such relationships are supported by the experimental studies on ultrapotassic rock compositions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 47 , Issue 342 , March 1983 , pp. 11 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arima, M., and Edgar, A.D. (1981) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 77, 288–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arima, M., and Edgar, A.D. (1982) J. Petrol. in press.Google Scholar
Barton, M. (1979) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 137, 113 34.Google Scholar
Arima, M. and Hamilton, D.L. (1979) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 69, 133–42.Google Scholar
Boettcher, A.L., and O'Neil, J. R. (1980) Am. J. Sci. 280–A, 594–621.Google Scholar
Boettcher, A.L., and O'Neil, J. R. Windom, K.E., Stewart, D.C., and Wilshire, H.G. (1979) Proc. Second Int. Kimberlite Conf. 2, 173–82.Google Scholar
Brey, G., and Green, D.H. (1977) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 61, 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, I.S. E. (1967) Ibid. 15, 24–66.Google Scholar
Duda, A., and Schmincke, H.U. (1978) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 132, 1–33.Google Scholar
Edgar, A.D. (1979) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 71, 1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, A.D. and Arima, M. (1981) Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Mh. 539–52.Google Scholar
Edgar, A.D. Condliffe, E., Barnett, R.L., and Shirran, R.J. (1980) Ibid. 21, 475–97.Google Scholar
Edgar, A.D. Green, D.H., and Hibberson, W.O. (1976) J. Petrol. 17, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goresy, A., and Yoder, H.S. Jr. (1974) Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 73, 359–71Google Scholar
Farmer, L., and Boettcher, A.L. (1981) Am. Mineral. 66, 1154–63.Google Scholar
Forbes, W.C., and Flower, M. F. J. (1974) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 22, 60–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, B., Cox, K.G., and Gurney, J.J. (1975) Phys. Chem. Earth, 9, 477–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, A. (1950) Am. Mineral. 35, 772–92.Google Scholar
Kuehner, S.M., Edgar, A.D., and Arima, M. (1981) Ibid. 66, 663–77.Google Scholar
Kushiro, I. (1970) Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearb. 68, 245–7.Google Scholar
Kushiro, I. Syono, Y., and Akimoto, S. (1967) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 3, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, F.E. (1981) Mineral. Mag. 44, 315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, F.E. and Bailey, D.K. (1975) Phys. Chem. Earth, 9, 389– 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.H. (1981) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 76,243–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R.H. and Bell, K. (1976) Ibid. 58, 293–303.Google Scholar
Modreski, P.J., and Boettcher, A.L. (1973) Am. J. Sci. 273, 385–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prider, R.T. (1960) J. Geol. Soc. Austral. 6, 71118.Google Scholar
Ringwood, A.E. (1975) In Composition and Petrology of the Earth's Mantle. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Roden, M.F., and Smith, D. (1979) Proc. Second Int. Kimberlite Conf. 1, 364-81.Google Scholar
Ryabehikov, I.D., and Green, D.H. (1978) In Problems of Petrology of Earth's Crust and Upper Mantle, Trudy Instituta Geol. Geofiz. 403, Nauka, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
van Kooten, G.K. (1980) J. Petrol. 21, 651–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velde, D. (1975) Am. Mineral. 60, 566–73.Google Scholar
Wendlandt, R.F., and Eggler, D.H. (1980) Am. J. Sci. 280, 421–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, H.S. Jr., and Kushiro, I. (1969) Ibid. 267–A, 558–82.Google Scholar