Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T20:11:10.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The crystal structure of kraisslite, [4]Zn3(Mn, Mg)25(Fe3+,Al)(As3+O3)2[(Si,As5+)O4]10(OH)16, from the Sterling Hill mine, Ogdensburg, Sussex County, New Jersey, USA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. A. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
F. C. Hawthorne*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada

Abstract

The crystal structure of kraisslite, orthorhombic (pseudo-hexagonal), a = 8.1821(1), b = 14.1946(3), c = 43.9103(8) Å, V = 5099.8(2) Å3, Z = 4 and dcalc = 4.083 g cm–3, has been solved by direct methods and refined in the space group C2221 to an R1 index of 1.68% for 7432 observed (|Fo| > 4σ|F|) reflections. Electron-microprobe analysis gave the following chemical composition: As2O510.86, As2O36.18, SiO213.39, Al2O30.25, Fe2O32.06, MnO 51.14, ZnO 7.39, MgO 2.13, CaO 0.05, H2Ocalc = 4.50, sum 97.95 wt.%; and empirical formula: Zn2.91(Mn23.07Mg1.69Ca0.03)Σ=24.79(Fe0.833+Al0.16)Σ=0.99(As3+O3)2[(Si0.71As0.305+)O4]10(OH)16 calculated on the basis of 62 anions with (OH) = 16 and As3+/(As3+ + As5+) taken from the refined crystal structure. The general formula, [4]Zn3(Mn,Mg)25(Fe3+,Al)(As3+O3)2[(Si,As5+)O4]10(OH)16, differs from those given previously.

There is one As3+ site with a <As–O> distance of 1.780 Å and a stereochemistry typical of a stereoactive lone-pair of electrons. There are five tetrahedrally coordinated T sites with <T–O> distances from 1.635 to 1.692 Å; the T(1) site is fully occupied by As5+, and the T(2)–T(5) sites are occupied by both Si and As5+. There are two tetrahedrally coordinated Zn sites with <T–O> distances of ∼1.996 Å, both of which are occupied by dominant Zn and minor Mn2+. There are thirteen octahedrally coordinated M sites, twelve of which are occupied by dominant Mn2+ with lesser Mg and minor Zn; <M–O> distances are in the range 2.197–2.284 Å. The <M(13)–O> distance is 2.083 Å and its lower site scattering indicates occupancy by Fe3+, Mn2+, Mg and Al. The structure consists of five crystallographically distinct layers of polyhedra, labelled m = 0 – 4. Layer m = 0 consists of corner-sharing Zn and (Si, As5+) tetrahedra, and layers m = 1–4 each consist of trimers of Mn2+ octahedra linked by (Si, As5+) tetrahedra and intrasheet hydrogen bonds (m = 1, 3) or (Si, As5+) tetrahedra and (Fe3+,Al) octahedra (m = 2) or (As5+) tetrahedra and (As3+O3) triangular pyramids and intrasheet hydrogen bonds (m = 4). The layers stack along [001] with reversals of the sequence m = 1, 2, 3, 4 at z = 0, ¼, ½ and ¾. Kraisslite is a member of the mcgovernite family.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, I.D. (1977) Hydrogen bonding in perchloric acid hydrates. Acta Crystallographica, A32, 786792.Google Scholar
Brown, I.D. (2002) The Chemical Bond in Inorganic Chemistry. The Bond Valence Model. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244247.Google Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1993) Edge-sharing Mn2+O4 tetrahedra in the structure of akatoreite, Mn2+ 9 Al2Si8O24(OH)8. The Canadian Mineralogist, 31, 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, M.A. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1999) The effect of differences in coordination on ordering of polyvalent cations in close-packed structures: The crystal structure of arakiite and comparison with hematolite. The Canadian Mineralogist, 37, 14711482.Google Scholar
Cooper, M.A. and Hawthorne, F.C. (2001) The biggest mineral: the crystal structure of mcgovernite. Eleventh Annual V. M. Goldschmidt Conference abstract, http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/ gold2001/pdf/3446.pdf.Google Scholar
Dunn, P.J. and Nelen, J.A. (1980) Kraisslite and mcgovernite: new chemical data. American Mineralogist, 65, 957960.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1983) Quantitative characterization of s i te-occupancies in mineral s. American Mineralogist, 68, 287306.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C., Ungaretti, L. and Oberti, R. (1995) Site populations in minerals: terminology and presentation of results of crystal-structure refinement. The Canadian Mineralogist, 33, 907911.Google Scholar
Le Page, Y. (1988) MISSYM1.1 - a flexible new release. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 21, 983984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P.B. and T. Araki (1978) Hematolite: a complex dense packed sheet structure. American Mineralogist, 63, 150159.Google Scholar
Moore, P.B. and Ito, J. (1978) Kraisslite, a new platy arsenosilicate from Sterling Hill, New Jersey. American Mineralogist, 63, 938940.Google Scholar
Palache, C. and Bauer, L.H. (1927) Mcgovernite, a new mineral from Sterling Hill, NJ. American Mineralogist, 12, 373374.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F. (1985) ‘PAP’ j(rZ) procedure for improved quantitative microanalysis. Pp. 104106.in: Microbeam Analysis (J.T. Armstrong, editor). San Francisco Press, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
Shannon, R.D. (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallographica, A32, 751767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuensch, B.J. (1960) The crystallography of mcgovernite, a complex arsenosilicate. American Mineralogist, 45, 937945.Google Scholar