Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T15:35:33.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The kinetics of crystal growth in an aluminosilicate glass containing small amounts of transition-metal ions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

J. Williamson
J. Williamson*
Affiliation:
Nuffield Research Group in Extraction Metallurgy, Imperial College, London, S.W.7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Quantitative data are presented for the kinetics of crystal growth in an aluminosilicate glass to which a few wt % of a transition-metal oxide had been added. The composition of the base glass was CaO 3o, MgO 2, Al2O3 15, SiO2 53 wt %, to which the oxides of iron, vanadium, chromium, or zinc were added. Glasses were prepared with a range of high to low valency ratios in cases where the transition metal oxide could exist in two or more oxidation states.

Small quantities of Fe2+, Fe3+, Zn2+, V3+, V4+, and V5+ were all found to increase the kinetics of crystal growth from the glass phase. The magnitude of the effect is compared with additions of Mg2+ to the glass. Cr2+, Cr3+, and Cr6+ were found to decrease the rates of crystal growth. Values for the apparent activation energy for crystal growth ranged from ∼50 kcal/mole to ∼150 kcal/mole. The high values were found to be of the same order of magnitude as that for the activation energy for viscous flow in the glass at the crystallization temperature.

The results are interpreted in terms of the structure of the glasses and current theories on the rate of crystallization of glasses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 37 , Issue 291 , September 1970 , pp. 759 - 770
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dietzel, (A.), 1942. Zeits. Elektrochem. 48, 9.Google Scholar
Higgins, (R.) and Jones, (J. B.), 1963. Bull. Inst. Min. Met. 72, 825.Google Scholar
Hillig, (W. B.) and Turnbull, (D.), 1956. Journ. Chem. Phys. 24, 914.10.1063/1.1742646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, (K. A.), 1958. Liquid Metals and Solidification, Amer. Soc. Metals (Cleveland).Google Scholar
Kakabadse, (G. J.) and Vassiliou, (E.), 1965. Phys. Chem. Glasses, 6, 33.Google Scholar
Keyworth, (B.), 1969. Ph.D. Thesis, London University.Google Scholar
Klemantaski, (S.) and Kerrison, (B.), 1966. Chem. Ind. 1747.Google Scholar
Machin, (J. S.), Yee, (T. B.), and Hanna, (D. L.), 1952. Journ. Amer. Ceramic Soc. 35, 322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pantony, (D. A.) and Vasu, (K. I.), 1968. Journ. Inorg. Nuc. Chem. 30, 433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, (P. S.), 1970. Min. Mag. 37, 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholes, (S.), private communication.Google Scholar
Turnbull, (D.) and Cohen, (M. H.), 1960. Modern Aspects of the Vitreous State, 1, Ed. Mackenzie, J. D., Butterworths (London).Google Scholar
Williamson, (J.), Tipple, (A. J.), and Rogers, (P. S.), 1968. Journ. Iron Steel Inst. 206, 898.Google Scholar
Williamson, (J.), Tipple, (A. J.), and Rogers, (P. S.), 1969. Journ. Mat. Sci. 4, 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar