Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T12:32:43.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Witwatersrand pyrites and metamorphism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

D. K. Hallbauer
Affiliation:
Chamber of Mines of South Africa, Research Organization, Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa
K. von Gehlen
Affiliation:
Institut für Geochemie, Petrologie und Lagerstättenkunde, University of Frankfurt, 6000 Frankfurt am Main, Federal Republic of Germany

Abstract

Evidence obtained from morphological and extensive trace element studies, and from the examination of mineral and fluid inclusions in Witwatersrand pyrites, shows three major types of pyrite: (i) detrital pyrite (rounded pyrite crystals transported into the depositional environment); (ii) synsedimentary pyrite (round and rounded aggregates of fine-grained pyrite formed within the depositional environmen); and (iii) authigenic pyrite (newly crystallized and/or recrystallized pyrite formed after deposition). The detrital grains contain mineral inclusions such as biotite, feldspar, apatite, zircon, sphene, and various ore minerals, and fluid inclusions with daughter minerals. Most of the inclusions are incompatible with an origin by sulphidization. Recrystallized authigenic pyrite occurs in large quantities but only in horizons or localities which have been subjected to higher temperatures during the intrusion or extrusion of younger volcanic rocks. Important additional findings are the often substantial amounts of pyrite and small amounts of particles of gold found in Archaean granites (Hallbauer, 1982) as possible source rocks for the Witwatersrand detritus. Large differences in Ag and Hg content between homogeneous single gold grains within a hand specimen indicate a lack of metamorphic homogenization. The influence of metamorphism on the Witwatersrand pyrites can therefore be described as only slight and generally negligible.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clemmey, H. (1981) Mineral. Mag. 44, 399408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, E. (1979) Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 291, 277–87.Google Scholar
Erasmus, C. S., Sellschop, J. P. F., and Hallbauer, D. K. (1982) Council for Mineral Technology, Randburg, Report No. M54, 18 pp.Google Scholar
Hallbauer, D. K. (1974) Chamber of Mines of S.A., Research Review, 4559.Google Scholar
Hallbauer, D. K. (1977) Ibid. 3650.Google Scholar
Hallbauer, D. K. (1982) Proc. 12th CM Ml Congress (Glen, H. W., ed.) 957–64.Google Scholar
Hallbauer, D. K. (in press) Proc. Intern. Conf. Appl. Mineralogy, Johannesburg 1981.Google Scholar
Hallbauer, D. K. and Kable, E. J. D. (1979) Abstr. 18th Congress Geol. Soc. S.A. Port Elizabeth, 1, 176–86.Google Scholar
Hallbauer, D. K. and Utter, T. (1977) Mineral Deposita, 12, 293306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirdes, W. (1979) Unpubl. thesis, Univ. Heidelberg, 199 pp.Google Scholar
Karcz, J. (1969) J. Sed. Petrol. 39, 333–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karweil, J. (1956) Z. Dtsch. Geol. Ges. 107, 132–9.Google Scholar
Metzger, F. W., Kelly, W. C. Nesbitt, B. E., and Essene, E. J. (1977) Econ. Geol. 72, 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuerburg, G. J. (1975) J. Res., U.S. Geol. Sun. 3, 377–8.Google Scholar
Ramdohr, P. (1958) Geol. Soc. S. Africa Trans. 61, Annexure, 50 pp.Google Scholar
Rising, B. A. (1973) Unpubl. thesis, The Pennsylvania State Univ., 205 pp.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. F. (1980) Unpubl. thesis, Univ. of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
von Gehlen, K. (in press) Mineral. Deposita, 18.Google Scholar