Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T20:47:18.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Enemy Agents at Work’: A microhistory of the 1954 Adamjee and Karnaphuli riots in East Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

LAYLI UDDIN Open the ORCID record for LAYLI UDDIN [Opens in a new window]
LAYLI UDDIN*
Affiliation:
King’s College London Email: layli.uddin@kcl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Between March and May 1954, an election and two riots took place in East Pakistan, with far-reaching implications. On 30 May, the prime minister of Pakistan, in a bellicose tone, declared that ‘enemy agents’ and ‘disruptive forces’ were at work and imposed governor's rule for the first time in East Pakistan. The autocratic and high-handed attitude of the Central government in Karachi over the seemingly wayward East Wing was to become a portent of future conflicts between the province and the state, eventually leading to the unmaking of Pakistan in 1971. What precipitated the 1954 crisis? Who were the enemy agents and disruptive forces that the prime minister had alluded to? The reference was to the Bengali labourers in East Pakistan—the main protagonists of the 1954 Karnaphuli Paper Mill and Adamjee Jute Mill riots. These were the most violent industrial riots in the history of United Pakistan, if not the subcontinent. Using sensitive materials obtained from multiple archives, this article dismantles the conventional thesis that these riots were ‘Bengali–Bihari riots’, fanned by the flames of Bengali provincialism at the political level, or events instigated by the Centre to derail the democratic hopes of the Bengali population of Pakistan. A microhistory of the events demonstrates a more complex picture of postcolonial labour formations and solidarities; the relationship between state-led industrialization and refugee rehabilitation, and conflicting visions of sovereignty. This is a story of estrangement between employers and workers over the question of who were the real sovereigns of labour, capital, and Pakistan itself.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , March 2021 , pp. 629 - 664
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am heavily indebted to Richard Williams and Matt Birkinshaw for their support throughout the entire process of writing and revising this article. Thanks are also due to the following for their excellent feedback and suggestions during earlier presentations and drafts: Sarah Ansari, Anish Vanaik, Sumeet Mhaskar, Aditya Sarkar, Anna Sailer, Lotte Hoek, Delwar Hussain, Ravi Ahuja, Kamran Asdar Ali, and attendees of the Labour History workshops in Warwick, Berlin, and Göttingen. I am very grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and critical engagement with the article. Needless to say, any mistakes are my own.

References

1 Ahmed Kamal's book on post-partition East Bengal up to 1954 continues to be pioneering work. See Kamal, Ahmed, State against the nation: the decline of the Muslim League in pre-independence Bangladesh, 1947–54 (Dhaka: University Press Limited, 2008)Google Scholar.

2 There has been a lot of work on the language movement; the following is a selection of the more critical articles: see Toor, Saadia, ‘Containing East Bengal: language, nation, and state formation in Pakistan, 1947—1952’, Cultural Dynamics, vol. 21, no. 2, 2009, pp. 185–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Alam, S. M. Shamsul, ‘Language as political articulation: East Bengal in 1952’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 21, no. 4, 1991, pp. 469–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Oldenburg, Phillip, ‘“A place insufficiently imagined”: language, belief and the Pakistan crisis of 1971’, The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 44, no. 4, 1985, pp. 711–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Park, Richard L., ‘East Bengal: Pakistan's troubled province’, Far Eastern Survey, vol. 23, no. 5, May, 1954, pp. 70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 ‘The Takeover: PM’, Dawn, 31 May 1954.

5 American Consul, Dacca, Pakistan, 1 June 1954, ‘Political developments in East Pakistan’, Record Group 84, National Archives, United States (USNA).

6 Ibid.

7 Elias, Khondoker Mohammed, Bhashani jakhana Europe (Dhaka: Muktadhara, 1978), p. 38Google Scholar.

8 James Burke, photographer for LIFE magazine (1951–64) was present in East Pakistan in the aftermath of the Adamjee Jute Mill riots and onset of governor's rule. He was the only photographer to have captured scenes during and after the Adamjee Jute Mill riots. His photographs of the events are available at https://layliuddin.wordpress.com/2019/08/20/enemy-agents-at-work-a-microhistory-of-the-1954-adamjee-and-karnaphuli-riots-in-east-pakistan/ [accessed 20 August 2019].

9 Various shouts were heard during the day; the prominent ones have been mentioned. High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, Appeal no. 201 of 1956 (Chittagong Hill Tracts), Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, pp. 74–75 (hereafter High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957).

10 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957.

11 Office of the UK High Commission, Dacca, 24 May 1954. ‘Preliminary reports on the Adamjee riots’, File no. DO35/5323, National Archives, United Kingdom (UKNA).

12 Ibid. On 14 May, Bengali workers killed a Bihari durwan, allegedly on the grounds that smoke from his cooking fire had wafted over to the Bengali housing colony, he refused to stop when asked, and was thus attacked. The durwan died from the injuries sustained.

13 Ibid. Biharis was a generic term used for the non-Bengali, largely Urdu-speaking refugee population in East Bengal. They came from different states in India such as Bihar, Orissa, Tripura, Assam, Uttar Pradesh, and so on. I will speak in detail later on the formation of Bihari identity.

14 ‘Adamjee Miler Hungamai 600 Lok Pran Harayeche’, Dainik Azad (Dacca), 10 September 1956.

15 Office of the UK High Commission in Pakistan, 20 May 1954. ‘Narayanganj riot’, File no. DO35/5336, UKNA.

16 Ahmed, Abul Mansur, Amar dekha rajniti: panchas bochor (Dhaka: Khushruj Kitab Mahal, 2010), p. 264Google Scholar.

17 Mohammed Toaha, ‘Smriti kotha’, Sanskriti, 2000. This was in a private collection bound into a collected volume. Information is not available on issue dates or page numbers.

18 Ahmed, Amar dekha rajniti, p. 262.

19 Pakistan Constituent Assembly Debates, vol. 1, no. 22-35, 1954, pp. 1361–1505.

20 Though there is little evidence to substantiate the claims that the Centre was responsible for the riots, it has been accepted by some historians as well as others. Please see Umar, Badruddin, The emergence of Bangladesh: class struggles in East Pakistan (1947–58) (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2004), p. 270Google Scholar. See also Ahmad, Kamruddin, Labour movement in East Pakistan (Dhaka: Progoti Publishers, 1969)Google Scholar; Ahmed, Salahuddin, Bangladesh: past and present (New Delhi: A.P.H. Publishing Corporation, 2004)Google Scholar.

21 See Ali, Kamran Asdar, Surkh salam: communist politics and class activism in Pakistan 1947–72 (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar; Marron, Stanley, ‘The problems of East Pakistan’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, June, 1955, pp. 132–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Weatherford, Willis D. Jr, ‘Pakistan’, in Labour in developing economies, ed. Galenson, Walter (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1962)Google Scholar.

22 Kamran Asdar Ali mentions ‘anti-management agitations’, but does not discuss them in detail. See Ali, Surkh salam, p. 204.

23 Ahuja, Ravi, ‘Preface’, in Working lives and worker militancy: the politics of labour in colonial India, ed. Ahuja, Ravi (Delhi: Tulika Books, 2013), pp. ix–xviGoogle Scholar.

24 Willem Van Schendel writes in his overview of labour historiography in South Asia of the dearth of scholarship on labour relations in East Pakistan. For labour scholarship on East Pakistan, see Van Schendel, Willem, ‘Stretching labour historiography: pointers from South Asia’, International Review of Social History, vol. 51, no. S14, 2006, pp. 229–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Badruddin Umar, The emergence of Bangladesh; Kamruddin Ahmad, Labour movement in East Pakistan; Ali, Tariq Omar, A local history of global capital: jute and peasant life in the Bengal delta (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 Ahuja, ‘Preface’, p. ix.

26 Anna Sailer, ‘Various paths are today opened: the Bengal Jute Mill strike of 1929 as a historical event’, in Working Lives and Worker Militancy, ed. Ravi Ahuja, pp. 207–255.

27 Ginzburg, Carlo, ‘Microhistory: two or three things that I know about it’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 1, Autumn, 1993, pp. 10–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Roy, Srirupa, Beyond belief: India and the politics of postcolonial nationalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007)Google Scholar. See also Gould, William, Sherman, Taylor, and Ansari, Sarah (eds), From subjects to citizens: society and the everyday state in India and Pakistan, 1947–1970 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar; Hansen, Thomas Blom and Stepputat, Finn (eds), States of imagination: ethnographic explorations of the postcolonial state (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gupta, Akhil, ‘Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics and the imagined state’, American Ethnologist, vol. 22, no. 2, May, 1995, pp. 375–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 For more on the division of assets during partition and after between India and Pakistan, see Jalal, Ayesha, The state of martial rule: the origin of Pakistan's political economy of defence (Lahore: Vanguard, 1991)Google Scholar; Jalal, Ayesha, Democracy and authoritarianism in South Asia: a comparative and historical perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Chatterji, Joya, The spoils of partition: Bengal and India, 1947–1967 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sengupta, Anwesha, ‘Breaking up: dividing assets between India and Pakistan in times of partition’, The Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 51, no. 4, 2014, pp. 529–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

30 Ahmed, Rakibuddin, The progress of the jute industry and trade (1855–1966) (Dhaka: Pakistan Central Jute Committee, 1966)Google Scholar.

31 Papanek, Hannah, ‘Pakistan's big businessmen: Muslim separatism, entrepreneurship, and partial modernization’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 21, no. 1, October, 1972, pp. 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Government of Pakistan, Economic progress of East Pakistan: a review of eight years of economic development (Karachi: Department of Advertising, Films and Publication, 1956)Google Scholar. For more substantive scholarship on state-led industrialization efforts in postcolonial South Asia, see Chibber, Vivek, Locked in place: state-building and late industrialisation in India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Bardhan, Pranab, The political economy of development in India (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Byres, T. J. (ed.), The state and planning in India (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Frankel, Francine, India's political economy, 1947–1977 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Kohli, Atul, State-directed development: political power and industrialization in the global periphery (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Zaidi, S. Akbar, Issues in Pakistan's economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Tariq Omar Ali, A local history of global capital.

33 Government of Pakistan, Economic Progress of East Pakistan, p. 32.

34 Ibid., pp. 11–12.

35 By 1954–55, Karnaphuli Paper Mill officially employed 3,000 workers on a daily basis. However, this does not include temporary or contractual labourers. The data for Adamjee Jute Mill are more difficult to disaggregate from other mill numbers. The total numbers officially employed on a daily basis in 1954–55 at the seven jute mills was 28,302. Adamjee Jute Mill was the largest mill in the world at that point; hence, more than likely, that they had the largest share of the 28,000 workers. For more, see Ahmed, Nafis, An economic geography of East Pakistan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1958)Google Scholar.

36 These numbers continued to fluctuate in line with government policies, food shortages, communal violence, and so on. See ‘Weekly and fortnightly reports from British High Commissioners and Deputy High Commissioners’, East Bengal, 1947–50, IOR/L/PJ/5/305-336, UKNA.

37 Siddiqi, Dina, ‘Left behind by the nation: “stranded Pakistanis” in Bangladesh’, Sites, vol. 10, no. 2, 2013, pp. 150–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 The refugees did not necessarily have a shared language between them, but spoke a mix of languages: Urdu, Bhojpuri, Magadhi, Maithili, and others. Although the term ‘Bihari’ is problematic, I will use it for easy identification, but also to reflect how the refugees are described in sources.

39 Ghosh, Papiya, ‘Reinvoking the Pakistan of the 1940s: Bihar's “stranded Pakistanis”’, Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences, vol. II, no. 1, 1995, pp. 131–146Google Scholar. For more interesting scholarship on the Biharis in East Pakistan and Bangladesh, see Alexander, Claire, Chatterji, Joya, and Jalais, Annu, The Bengal diaspora: rethinking Muslim migration (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar; Redclift, Victoria, Statelessness and citizenship: camps and the creation of political space (Abingdon: Routledge, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ghosh, Papiya, Partition and the South Asian diaspora: extending the subcontinent (Delhi: Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar; Rahman, Md. Mabubur and Schendel, Willem V., ‘“I am not a refugee”: rethinking partition migration’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 37, no. 3, July, 2003, pp. 551–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Siddiqi, ‘Left behind by the nation’; Chatterji, The spoils of partition.

40 More work needs to be done on the relationship between state-led industrialization and refugee rehabilitation in postcolonial nation states, and in particular the relationship that refugees forged with industrial scapes and relations. There is some scholarship on this: see Gyanesh Kudaisya, ‘Divided landscapes, fragmented identities: East Bengal refugees and their rehabilitation in India, 1947–79’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 17, no. 1, 1996, pp. 24–39; Chatterji, The spoils of partition.

41 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957.

42 Government of East Bengal, ‘Review of half-yearly return of serious crimes for the period ending on 30.6.54’, Home Police, B Proceedings, File no. 156, November 1954, National Archives, Dhaka (NAD).

43 Government of East Bengal, ‘Suspension orders to the L.S.S of this dptt for non compliance with govt. orders’, Home Police, B Proceedings, File no. 6D, January 1952, NAD.

44 Government of East Bengal, ‘Review of half-yearly return of serious crimes for the period ending on 30.6.54’.

45 R. K. Bose handed over the negative rolls to the police; see High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, pp. 50–51.

46 Ibid., for Badaruddin, p. 45; for Abdur Rahman, p. 102; for Abul Kasem Zaidi, p. 66.

47 Ibid., p.162.

48 ‘Confessional statement of accused Anu Miyan’, in ‘Serious rioting at Chandraghona Paper Mills in the district of Chittagong Hill Tracts on 22.3.54’, Home Police, B Proceedings, File no. 166, January–July 1959, NAD (hereafter Chandraghona Files).

49 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 144.

50 Ibid., p. 144. The Judge S. M. Hasan described the men killed as those who were suspected to be ‘supporters and associates’ of Khurshid Ali.

51 Chakrabarty, Dipesh, ‘On deifying and defying authority: managers and workers in the jute mills of Bengal, circa 1890–1940’, Past and Present, vol. 100, no. 1, August, 1983, pp. 124–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 ‘Memo from Office of the Superintendent of Police, Chittagong Hill Tracts’, 2 April 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

53 See fn. 12.

54 ‘Adamjee Miler Hungamai 600 Lok Pran Harayeche’, Dainik Azad (Dacca).

55 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 15.

56 Chakrabarty, Dipesh, Rethinking working-class history: Bengal 1890–1940 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan, The origins of industrial capitalism in India: business strategies and the working classes in Bombay 1900–1940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

58 Sarkar, Sumit, ‘The return of labour to South-Asian history’, Historical Materialism, vol. 12, no. 2, 2004, pp. 285–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 Gooptu, Nandini, The politics of the urban poor in early twentieth-century India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Joshi, Chitra, Lost worlds: Indian labour and its forgotten histories (Ranikhet: Permanent Black, 2003)Google Scholar.

60 Joshi, Lost Worlds, p. 275.

61 Alexander, Chatterji, and Jalais, The Bengal diaspora, pp. 163–171.

62 Hussain, A. F. A., Human and social impact of technological change in Pakistan: a report on a survey conducted by the University of Dacca and published with the assistance of UNESCO, vol. 1 (London: Oxford University Press, 1956), p. 123Google Scholar, emphasis added.

63 In 1964, the editor of Pakistan Observer in conversation with American Consul and Vice Consul said: ‘West Pakistani businessmen operating in Dacca and Narayanganj were encouraging trouble because they were interested in having more Bihari labourers at their mills. They wanted this because they regarded the Biharis as more docile than the Bengalis.’ See fn. 59 in Ghosh, Partition and the South Asian diaspora, p. 18.

64 Hussain, Human and social, p. 247.

65 UK High Commission, Dacca, ‘Letter from G.P Hampshire to J.D Murray, Acting High Commissioner for the United Kingdom in Pakistan’, 24/5/1954, DO35/5323, UKNA.

66 ‘Memo from Office of the Superintendent of Police, Chittagong Hill Tracts’, 2 April 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

67 There are very few data on the actual labour force of these large mills, but readings of various documents indicate the regular use of casual labour.

68 ‘Confessional statement of accused Anu Miyan’, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

69 Richard Kriegel, Labor in Pakistan, 1947–59 (n.p., 1959).

70 de Haan, Arjan, ‘The badli system in industrial labour recruitment: managers’ and workers’ strategies in Calcutta's jute industry’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 33, nos. 1–2, 1999, pp. 271–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Basu, Subho, Does class matter? Colonial capital and workers’ resistance in Bengal (1890–1937) (New Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar.

72 International Labour Organisation, Report of the ILO labour survey mission on labour problems in Pakistan, August 1952–February 1953 (Karachi: Government of Pakistan, 1953), p. 16Google Scholar.

73 Hussain, Human and social, pp. 104–109.

74 ‘Memo from Office of the Superintendent of Police, Chittagong Hill Tracts’, 2 April 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

75 ‘F.I.R on Chandraghona’, 22 March 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

76 Chandavarkar, The origins of industrial capitalism in India.

77 For more on urban daily labour markets, see Mosse, David, Gupta, Sanjeev, and Shah, Vidya, ‘On the margins in the city: Adivasi seasonal labour migration in Western India’, Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 40, no. 28, 9–15 July, 2005, pp. 3025–3038Google Scholar; Prasad-Aleyamma, Mythri, ‘The cultural politics of wages: ethnography of construction work in Kochi, India’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 51, no. 2, 2017, pp. 163–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Agarwala, Rina, Informal labour, formal politics, and dignified discontent in India (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 UK High Commission, Dacca, ‘Letter from G.P Hampshire to J.D Murray, Acting High Commissioner for the United Kingdom in Pakistan’.

79 Mukherjee, Janam, Hungry Bengal: war, famine and the end of empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Ibid., p. 230.

81 Kriegel, Labour in Pakistan, p. 84.

82 Ibid., p. 84.

83 ‘Meeting Report’, 21 March 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

84 Candland, C., Labor, democratisation and development in India and Pakistan (Oxford: Routledge, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 International Labour Organisation, Report of the ILO labour survey mission, p. 134.

86 ‘Dispute between the Government Dockyard Narayanganj and their employees under section 12 (6) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947’, Commerce (Labour) Department. B Proceedings, File no. 1, May 1947–January 1951, NAD.

87 Ahmad, Labour movement in East Pakistan, p. 38.

88 Basu, Does class matter?, pp. 225–273.

89 ‘Industrial Disputes Act—appointment of District Judge, Dacca as Tribunal –Sonachura Workshop’, Commerce (Labour) Department, B Proceedings, File no. 1, July–August 1953, NAD.

90 ‘East Pakistan labour review’, 22 May 1954, Pakistan, Labour Attache Reports, Lab 13/525, UKNA.

91 ‘FIR on Chandraghona’, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

92 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 62.

93 Ibid., p. 8.

94 ‘Letter from UK Trade Commissioner Service’, Chittagong, 25/3/1954, DO35/5336, UKNA.

95 International Labour Organisation, Report of the ILO labour survey mission, p. 21.

96 Ahmed Sofa, ‘Karnafulir dhare’ (1965), available at http://arts.bdnews24.com/?p=2972 [accessed 23 December 2015].

97 Datta, Kalikinkar, ‘The Santhal insurrection of 1855–6 (Part II)’, Bengal: Past and Present, vol. 51, pt. 1, no. 101, 1936, pp. 19–35Google Scholar.

98 Kerr, Ian J., ‘On the move: circulating labour in pre-colonial, colonial, and post-colonial India’, International Review of Social History, vol. 51, no. S14, 2006, pp. 85–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

99 Ahmed Sofa, ‘Karnafulir dhare’.

100 de Haan, Arjan, ‘Migration in Eastern India: a segmented labour market’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, vol. 32, no. 1, 1995, pp. 51–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

101 Breman, Jan, ‘The study of industrial labour in post-colonial India: a concluding review’, Contributions to Indian Sociology, vol. 33, nos. 1 & 2, 1999, pp. 407–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, pp. 62, 145.

103 ‘FIR on Chandraghona’, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

104 The historiography on the role of labour contractors in colonial South Asia is particularly rich; see Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan, ‘The decline and fall of the jobber system in the Bombay cotton textile industry, 1870–1955’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, 2008, pp. 117–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sen, Samita, ‘Commercial recruiting and informal intermediation: debate over the sardari system in Assam tea plantations, 1860–1900’, Modern Asian Studies, vol. 44, no. 1, 2010, pp. 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Varma, Nitin, Coolies of capitalism: Assam tea and the making of coolie labour (Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2017)Google Scholar; Kerr, Ian J., Building the railways of the Raj: 1850–1900 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar.

105 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 161.

106 Chandavarkar, The origins of industrial capitalism in India. For discussions on the working-class neighbourhood, see also Gooptu, The politics of the urban poor; Basu, Does class matter?.

107 ‘Meeting Report’, 21 March 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

108 For broader discussions of the role of neighbourhood, see Chandavarkar, The origins of industrial capitalism in India; Gooptu, The politics of the urban poor.

109 The Union President of Chandraghona Paper Mill Workers Union, Ali Akbar of Noakhali was a subcontractor under Aminullah Patwari. See fn. 104 for labour historiography on jobbers.

110 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 83.

111 ‘Memo from Office of the Superintendent of Police, Chittagong Hill Tracts’, 2 April 1954, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

112 ‘Report on visit on Wednesday 24th March 1954’, DO35/5336, UKNA.

113 ‘Memo from Special Police Investigation Centre on 21.4.54’, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

114 H. W. Glasgow, a New Zealand cost consultant deputed to the mills as part of the Colombo Plan, spoke of Khurshid Ali's constant fear of ‘sabotage’ at the hands of his Bengali employees. See ‘Chandraghona Paper Mill’, DO35/5336, UKNA.

115 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, pp. 26–27.

116 These slogans were a constant during the riot; ibid., pp. 21–22, 39.

117 Ibid., pp. 21–22.

118 Ibid., p. 193.

119 ‘Meeting Report, 21 March 1954’, in Government of East Bengal (1957), Chandraghona Files.

120 Sen, Samita, Women and labour in late colonial India: the Bengal jute industry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar.

121 Hussain, Human and social, pp. 192–194.

122 For excellent work on women, sexuality, and the concept of honour in South Asia, see Mookherjee, Nayanika, The spectral wound: sexual violence, public memories, and the Bangladesh war of 1971 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015)Google Scholar; Saikia, Yasmin, Women, war and the making of Bangladesh: remembering 1971 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011)Google Scholar; Zamindar, Vazira Fazila-Yacoobali, The long partition and the making of modern South Asia: refugees, boundaries, histories (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Menon, Ritu and Bhasin, Kamla, Borders and boundaries: women in India's partition (New Delhi: Kali for Women, 1998)Google Scholar; Butalia, Urvashi, The other side of silence: voices from the partition of India (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1998)Google Scholar.

123 Ahmed Sofa, ‘Karnafulir dhare’.

124 On Chandraghona, see UK High Commission, Karachi to Commonwealth Relations Office, 24/3/1954, DO35/5336, UKNA. On Adamjee, see ‘Extract from Dacca report, for period ending 19.5.54’, DO35/5336, UKNA.

125 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 82.

126 ‘Diary of chief events, 1954’, File no. DO35/5324, UKNA.

127 High Court, Dacca, 29 August 1957, p. 152.

128 See Government of East Bengal, Eastern Pakistan Labour Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, September, 1954 (Dhaka: Labour Directorate)Google Scholar. In the second fortnight of August, a representation is made by retrenched workers of Adamjee Jute Mill asking for reinstatement to their old positions; the Labour Directorate had yet to take on their case as the management was yet to ‘screen’ the workers.

129 Government of East Pakistan, ‘Augmentation of the investigation staff of Dacca and Narayanganj Towns’, Home Police, B Proceedings, File no. 170, August–September 1960, NAD.

130 Chatterji, Joya, ‘The Bengali Muslim: a contradiction in terms? An overview of the debate on the Bengali Muslim identity’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, vol. 16, no 2, 1996, pp. 16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar. There has been plenty of excellent scholarship since that has complicated the ‘Bengali-ness’ of the Bengal Muslim identity; see Bose, Neilesh, Recasting the region: language, culture and Islam in colonial Bengal (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tariq Omar Ali, A local history of global capital.

131 Ahmed Kamal, State against the nation, p. 6.

132 Alexander, Chatterji, and Jalais, The Bengal diaspora.