Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:15:21.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Hell to Paradise? Voluntary Transfer of Convicts to the Andaman Islands, 1921–1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

TAYLOR C. SHERMAN*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway University of London E-mail: taylor.sherman@rhul.ac.uk

Abstract

The paper attempts to understand the challenges and opportunities which the penal settlement at Port Blair in the Andaman Islands presented to colonial governments in twentieth-century India. To this end, the paper examines a scheme drawn up in the 1920s which saw the introduction of a much more liberal regime for convicts in Port Blair. Under these plans, convicts were granted access to land and encouraged to bring their families from the mainland. This research reveals that the policies which determined the history of the settlement in this period were defined by two tensions. First, there was a constant battle between the central authorities and provincial governments over the shape and purposes of the settlement. Second, there was a contradiction between the penal objectives of the colony and the larger strategies which aimed to develop the islands for the greater British empire.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Archive Collections

Ferrar Papers, Centre of South Asian Studies, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
India Office Records, British Library, London, Legislative Assembly Proceedings, Military Department and Parliamentary Office files.Google Scholar
National Archives of India, New Delhi, Home (Jails), Home (Political) files.Google Scholar
Uttar Pradesh State Archives, Lucknow, Judicial (Criminal) files.Google Scholar
West Bengal State Archives, Calcutta, Revenue (Jails) files.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anderson, Clare, Convicts in the Indian Ocean: Transportation from South Asia to Mauritius, 1815–1853 (Houndmills: Macmillan, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadorai, A., Dyarchy in Practice (London: Longmans, Green & Company, 1937).Google Scholar
Brown, Judith M., Gandhi's Rise to Power: Indian Politics 1915–1922 (Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Cooper, Frederick and Stoler, Ann Laura (eds.), Tensions of Empire: Colonial Cultures in a Bourgeois World (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damousi, Joy, Depraved and Disorderly: Female Convicts, Sexuality and Gender in Colonial Australia (Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhingra, Kiran, The Andaman and Nicobar Islands in the Twentieth Century (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Duffield, Ian and Bradley, James (eds.), Representing Convicts: New Perspectives on Convict Forced Labour Migration (London: Leicester University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Forsythe, William James, Penal Discipline, Reformatory Projects and the English Prison Commission 1895–1939 (Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Joshi, Himanshu, Yatana-Shivir Mein (Andaman ki Ankahi Kahani) [In the Torture Camp (The Untold Story of the Andamans)] (Delhi: Rajpal and Sons, 1998).Google Scholar
Low, D.A., ‘“Civil Martial Law”: The Government of India and the Civil Disobedience Movements 1930–1934’ in Low, D.A. (ed.), Congress and the Raj: Facets of the Indian Struggle 1917–1947 (London: Heinemann, 1977), pp. 165198.Google Scholar
Mathur, L.P., Kala Pani: History of Andaman & Nicobar Islands with a study of India's Freedom Struggle (Delhi: Eastern Book Corporation, 1985).Google Scholar
Metcalf, Thomas R., The New Cambridge History of India, volume III. 4: Ideologies of the Raj (Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Minault, Gail, Khilafat Movement: Religious Symbolism and Political Mobilization in India (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Pannikar, K.M., (“Kerala Putra”), The Working of Dyarchy in India, 1919–1928 (Bombay: D. B. Taraporevala Sons & Company, 1928).Google Scholar
Pannikar, K.N., Against Lord and State: Religion and Peasant Uprisings in Malabar, 1836–1921 (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Sarkar, Tanika, Bengal 1928–1934: The Politics of Protest (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Sen, Satadru, Disciplining Punishment: Colonialism and Convict Society in the Andaman Islands (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Sen, SatadruRationing Sex: Female Convicts in the Andamans’, South Asia, Vol. 30, No.1 (1999), pp. 2959.Google Scholar
Shastri, Urmila, Karagar [Prison] (2nd edn., Delhi: Atmaram and Sons, 1980).Google Scholar
Sherman, Taylor C., ‘The Politics of Punishment and State Violence’ (PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2006).Google Scholar
Sherman, Taylor C. ‘State Practice, Nationalist Politics and the Hunger Strikes of the Lahore Conspiracy Case Prisoners, 1929–1939’, Journal of Cultural and Social History (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Singh, N. Iqbal, The Andaman Story (New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House Limited, 1978).Google Scholar
Sinha, S.N.P, Kala Pani: Andaman v Nicobar dveep samuh ke bhaugolik-samajik-sanskritik itihas ka dastawez [Black Water: Documents on the Geographical, Social and Cultural History of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands]. (Delhi: Manu Prakaashana, 2000).Google Scholar
Vaidik, Aparna, ‘Settling the Convict: Matrimony and Domesticity in the Andamans’, Studies in History, Vol. 22, No. 2 (2006), pp. 221251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, Conrad, The Moplah Rebellion and its Genesis (New Delhi: People's Publishing House, 1987).Google Scholar
Yang, Anand A., ‘Indian Convict Workers in Southeast Asia in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries’, Journal of World History. Vol. 14, No. 2 (2004), pp. 179208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar