Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T06:25:41.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Publicity, Civil Liberties, and Political Life in Princely Hyderabad

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2019

RAMA SUNDARI MANTENA*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Email: rmantena@uic.edu

Abstract

In the 1930s, there were two glaring questions confronting the princely state of Hyderabad's Administration: the question of sovereignty (or the political future of the Hyderabad) and the problem of civil liberties. This article explores the complex socio-political conditions in the early decades of the twentieth century that gave rise to the formation of dynamic civil-society institutions in the princely state of Hyderabad. In particular, it asks how and why the discourse of civil liberties was taken up by these institutions and assesses the response of the Hyderabad Administration with respect to safeguarding civil liberties for its subjects. What the historical record reveals is that the early decades of the twentieth century in Hyderabad became a battleground between the Hyderabad Administration and the burgeoning public sphere that the Administration could not control nor manage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is dedicated to the memory of Kavita S. Datla (1975–2017), who introduced me to the complex history and politics of princely Hyderabad and inspired me to cross over from archival research focused primarily on the Madras presidency and British India into the world of princely states. I am indebted to the many readers of this article over the years, in particular Kavita S. Datla, Karuna Mantena, A. Suneetha, M. A. Moid, Sunil Purushotham, Bhavani Raman, and the two anonymous readers for MAS who have all helped me to broaden my thinking on this topic and to expand my project. Audiences at Anveshi in Hyderabad, UT-Austin, Indiana University-Bloomington, Yale University, and at the University of Illinois at Chicago have offered fresh insights and allowed me to revise and sharpen my arguments.

References

Bate, B.“To persuade them into speech and action”: Oratory and the Tamil political, Madras, 1905–1919’, Comparative Studies in Society and History 55:1 (2013): 142166.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. A. Recovering Liberties: Indian Thought in the Age of Liberalism and Empire, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Benichou, L. From Autocracy to Integration: Political Developments in Hyderabad State (1938–1948), New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2000.Google Scholar
Bhagavan, M.Princely states and the making of modern India: Internationalism, constitutionalism and the postcolonial moment’, The Indian Economic and Social History Review, 46: 3 (2009): 427456.Google Scholar
Copland, I.“Communalism” in princely India: The case of Hyderabad, 1930–1940’, Modern Asian Studies 22:4 (1988): 783814.Google Scholar
Copland, I. The Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917–1947, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Datla, K. The Language of Secular Islam: Urdu Nationalism and Colonial India, Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hasan, S. A. Whither Hyderabad? A Brief Study of Some of the Outstanding Problems of the Premier Indian State, Madras: B.N. Press, 1935.Google Scholar
H.E.H. The Nizam's Educational Department. Curriculum for Primary and Middle Schools, Hyderabad–Deccan: Government Central Press, 1931.Google Scholar
Jawad Razvi, S. M. Political Awakening in Hyderabad, Hyderabad: Visalandhra Publishing House, 1980.Google Scholar
Jha, M.Nehru and civil liberties in India’, The International Journal of Human Rights 7:3 (2003): 103115.Google Scholar
Lohia, R. The Struggle for Civil Liberties, All India Congress Committee, 1936, foreword by P. Jawaharlal Nehru.Google Scholar
Manjapra, K. M. N. Roy: Marxism and Colonial Cosmopolitanism, London/New York/New Delhi: Taylor & Francis Group, 2016.Google Scholar
Mantena, R.The Andhra movement, Hyderabad state and the historical origins of the Telangana demand’, India Review 13:4 (2014): 337357.Google Scholar
Moid, M. A. and Suneetha, A.Rethinking Majlis's politics: Pre 1948 Muslim concerns in Hyderabad state’, The Indian Economic and Social History Review 55:1 (2018): 2952.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Naregal, V. Language Politics, Elites and the Public Sphere: Western India under Colonialism, New Delhi: Permanent Black, 2001.Google Scholar
Narsing Rao, M. Yabhai Samvatsaramula Hyderabad, Hyderabad, 1977.Google Scholar
Nehru, J.The unity of India’, Foreign Affairs, January 1938.Google Scholar
Orsini, F. The Hindi Public Sphere 1920–1940: Language and Literature in the Age of Nationalism, New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Pattabhi Sitaramayya, B. ‘The Indian States’ People's Conference’, presidential address of Dr B. Pattabhi Sitaramayya, Fifths Session, 18–19 July 1936, Karachi.Google Scholar
Pernau, M. The Passing of Patrimonialism: Politics and Political Culture in Hyderabad, 1911–1948, New Delhi: Manohar Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
Purushotham, S. ‘Federation in colonial India: The princes and partition’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Ramusack, B. The Indian Princes and Their States (The New Cambridge History of India), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Reddy, R. N. Heroic Telangana: Reminiscences & Experiences, New Delhi: Communist Party Publications, 1973.Google Scholar
Report of the Reforms Committee 1938 1347 F, Hyderabad-Deccan: Government Central Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Roosa, J.The Quandary in the qaum: Indian nationalism in a Muslim state, Hyderabad, 1850–1948’, PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1998.Google Scholar