Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T18:09:28.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Housing in Colonial Indonesia 1900–1940

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

James L. Cobban
James L. Cobban
Affiliation:
Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Provision of housing for the urban poor has been a problem of long standing in the Third World. In some countries efforts at housing supply go beyond events which began forty years ago after World War II when large numbers of people began moving to the cities of Latin Amercia, Africa, and Asia giving rise to uncontrolled urban settlements and causing crowded living conditions in the already built-up areas. In Southeast Asia some colonial governments recognized the housing problem at the beginning of the twentieth century and began programs to ameliorate housing shortages and to improve living conditions for the urban masses. The investigative housing commissions in Singapore beginning in 1907 and the faltering efforts of the Singapore Improvement Trust perhaps are the best known examples. They were the precursors of the Housing and Development Board established in i960 in whose structures live some 85 percent of the Singapore population today. Urban officials in colonial Indonesia, the former Dutch East Indies, also had concerns for the housing of the masses. The Dutch colonial government eventually passed legislation which in a mild way supported housing and- was concerned to some extent with housing construction. For their part, the large cities on Java were more active.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 27 , Issue 4 , October 1993 , pp. 871 - 896
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Report of the Housing Committee, Singapore, 1947 (Sinagapore: Government Printing Office, 1948), pp. 2–5.Google Scholar

2 For American urban conditions see Lubove, Roy, The Progressives and the Slums (Pittsburg: University of Pottsburgh Press, 1962); for English conditionsGoogle Scholar see Ashworth, William, The Genesis of Modern British Town planning (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1954),Google ScholarBriggs, Asa, Victorian Cities (New York: Harper and Row, 1963),Google ScholarDennis, Richard, English Industrial Cities of the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984),CrossRefGoogle ScholarTarn, John Nelson, ‘Housing Reform and the Emergence of Town Planning in Britain before 1914’ in The Rise of Modern Urban Planning 1800–1914 ed. Anthony, Sutcliffe (New York: St Martin's Press, 1980), pp. 71–97,Google ScholarCherry, Gordon E., ‘The Place of Neville Chamberlain in British Town Planning’, in Shaping an Urban World ed. Gordon, E. Cherry (New York: St Martin's Press, 1980), pp. 161–79,Google ScholarCherry, Gordon E., Cities and Plans (London: Edward Arnold, 1988); for German conditionsGoogle Scholar see Dawson, William, Municipal Life and Government in Germany (London: Longmans, Green, 1914),Google ScholarHorsfall, T. C., The Improvement of the Dwellings and Surroundings of the People: The Example of Germany (Manchester: The University Press 1905),Google Scholar and Bollerey, Franziska and Hartmann, Kristiana, ‘A Patriarchal Utopia: The Garden City and Housing Reform in Germany at the Turn of the Century’, in The Rise of Modern Urban Planning 1800–1914 ed. Anthony, Sutcliffe (New York: St Martin's Press, 1980), pp. 135–64;Google Scholar for conditions in Dutch cities in the nineteenth century see van den Berg, J. J. C., ‘Iets Over Utrecht's Uitbreiding’, Tijdschrift voor Volkshuisvesting 3/11 (1922): PP. 290–8, reference on p. 298.Google Scholar

3 Flieringa, Gellius, De Zorg voor de Volkshuisvesting in de Stadsgemeenten in Nederlandsch Oost Indie in het Bijzonder in Semarang (Amsterdan: van Leer, 1930), p. 86.Google Scholar

4 Karsten, Thomas, ‘Volkshuisvesting I’ in 25 Jaren Decentralisatie in Nederlandsch Indie 1905–1930 ed. Kerchman, F. W. M. (Semarang: Vereeniging voor Locale Belangen, 1930), pp. 159–61, reference on pp. 159–60.Google Scholar

5 In the literature, the word ‘volkshuisvesting’ was used in two senses: (1) narrowly as low-cost housing built or projected to be bulit by governments whether central, regional, or mucipal or with these governments’ support, and (2) brodly as housing for the mass of urban, usully low-income populations whether native or European.

6 Ruckert, J. J., ‘Volkshuisvesting II’, 25 Jaren Decentralisatie in Nederlandsch Indie 1905–1930 ed. Kerchman, F. W. M. (semarang: G. Kolff, 1930), pp. 162–73, refernce on p. 154.Google Scholar

7 Tillema, H. F., Van Wonen en Bewonen, Van Bouwen, Huis en Erf (Tjandi-Semarang: n.p., 1913), p.57.Google Scholar

8 Reprinted in Tillema, H. F., Over't vraagstuk van ‘het Wonen’ in Kromo's groote land ('s-Gravenchage: H. Uden Masman, 1915–1922), 5 vols reference to vol. 2 (1916), pp. 48–9.Google Scholar

9 Ruckert, J. J., ‘Kampongverbetering in het centrum der belangstelling’, Locale Belangen, 15/5 (1928), pp. 203–9, reference on p. 204.Google Scholar

10 Locale Belangen 7/5 (1 09 1919), 157–62;Google ScholarRuckert, J. J., ‘Volkshuisvesting II’, pp. 162–3. The Volksraad was an advisory body to the central government made up of private citizens and non-officals.Google Scholar

11 Schrieke, J. J., Inleiding in het Staartsrecht van Nederlands-Indie (Haarlem: Tjeenk Willink & Zoon, 1940), pp. 148–50.Google Scholar

12 Ibid., pp. 150–1. These were Batavia, Meester Cornelis, Buitenzorg (Bogor), Bandung, Cheribon, Pekalongan, Tegal, Semarang, Surabaya, Magelang, Kediri, Blitar, Malang, Sukabumi, Salatiga, Modijokerto, Pasuruan, Probolinggo, Madiun on Java and Padang, Palembang, Makassar (Ujung Pandang), Medan, Tebingtinggi, Bindjai, Tandjungbalai, Pematang Si Atar, Fort de Kock, Sawah Luntu, Bandjermasin, Manado, Amboina in the outer islands.

13 Schrieke, J. J., Bepalingen en Beginselen der Decentralisatie van 1903 (Weltevreden: Commissie voor de Volkslecteur, 1920) pp. 22, 35, 42;Google ScholarWoesthoff, P. W., De Indische Decentralisatie Wetgeving (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1915), PP. 128–9.Google Scholar

14 Such autonomy was guaranteed by article 71 of the Indian Constituion of 1854, protected by the authority of the governor general, and restated in the Acts of Incorportation which established the cities.

15 On the expansion of Semarang's hinterland see Cobban, James L., ‘Kampungs and Conflict in Colonial Semarang”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 19/2 (1988); 266–91, reference on pp. 270–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

16 Flieringa, , Zorg, p. 165.Google Scholar

17 Ibid., pp. 186–90. The remaining three were the Building Assocation of Semarang City Officials (Bouwvereeniging van Semarangsche Gemeente Ambtenaren) formed in 1902, the Fight Against the Housing Shortage Building Association (Bouwvereeninging ‘De Woningsnoodbestrijding’) formed in 1921, and the Building Company of East Semarang (Bouwmaatschappij Oost Semarang) which sold out to the city in 1924.

18 Flieringa, , Zorg, pp. 208, 210.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., pp. 201–5.

20 de Jongh, D., Het Woningvraagatuk, p. 20.Google Scholar

21 de Jongh, D., Het Woningvraagstuk. Mededeeling No. 26. Praeadvies uitgebracht voor het Achtste Decentralisatie Congress te houden den 19 en 20 May 1918 te Batavia. Locale Belangen 5/21 (1 May 1918): bijlage.Google Scholar

22 For the Kampung improvement side of the housing questuion in Semarang and in the Indies as a whole as a whole during the colonial time see Cobban, , ‘Kampungs and Conflict’.Google Scholar

23 Flieringa, , Zorg, p. 85.Google Scholar

24 , R., ‘Het Volkshuisvestingcongres’, Locale Belangen 9/21 (1 05 1922), pp. 777–83, reference on p. 778.Google Scholar

25 Flieringa, , Zorg, pp. 86–8.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., p. 89. Thomas Karsten, Indiese Stedebouw, Mededeeling No. 40, reprinted in the journal Locale Belangen, 7de jaargang, bijlage van aflevering 19/20, 1 and 16 April 1920, pp. 145–255. Karsten was the leading exponent of town planning in the Indies during the 1920s and 1930s.

27 Flieringa, , Zorg, p. 90.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., pp. 90–2.

29 Ibid., 94–5.

30 Ibid., p. 95. Wiji kunnen van den Inlander niets overnemen.

31 Ibid., pp. 96–9.

32 Ibid., p. 102.

33 Ibid., pp. 102–4.

34 The complete list of these proposals appear in ibid., pp. 317–21. The replies to the survey appear on pp. 105–11.

35 The Batavian Building Regulations 1919 to 1941 has eighty-three pages of building regulations, nineteen pages concerning the designation of building areas and building types (which reflects or determines land use), nine pages concerned with open space around buildings, and forty pages concerned with town planning. Bamboo is mentioned in the definition of temporary housing. Otherwise the document addresses European standards and concepts.

36 Flieringa, , Zorg, pp. 139–40.Google Scholar

37 These were in the cities of Semarang, (December 1925), Cheribon (August 1926), Batavia (September 1926), Surabaya (January 1927), Bogors (May 1928), Sukabumi (July 1928), and Pekalongan (December 1928) on the island of Java, Makassar (Ujung Pandang) (September 1927) on the island of Sulawesi, and Palembang (November 1928) on the island of Sumatra. Those in preparation were Tehal, Mojokerto, Madium, and Menado,Google Scholaribid. p. 152.

38 Schotman, R. A., ‘De Europeesche Stadsgemeente in Haar Oostersch milieu’. Mededeeling No. 65. Prae-advies uitgebracht voor het zeventwinde Decentralisatie Congress, te houden op 4 en 5 06 1927 te Malang. Locale Belangen 14/10 (16 Mei 1927): bijiage, reference on p. 15.Google Scholar

39 The criterion of Profitability had come under attack a few years after the founding of the companies. See Dijkerman, G. J., ‘Enkele opmerkingen in zake het Volkshuisvestingsvraagstulk in Nederlandsch Indie’, Locale Belangen 16/2 (16 01 1929): 47–54Google Scholar and Ruckert, J. J., ‘Enkele opmerkingen in zake het Volkshuisvestingsvaraagstuk in Nederlandsch Indie’, Locale Belangen 16/3 (1 02 1929); 118–20.Google Scholar

40 Reply to SirSchultz, F. M. Razoux, ‘De N. V. Volkshuisvesting in de Practijk’, Locale Techniek 8/5 (1938): 141–2, reference on p. 142.Google Scholar

41 See opmerkingen, ‘De N. V. en Volkshuisvesting’, Locale Techniek 8/5 (1939): 126.Google Scholar

42 Berichten, , ‘Derde Volkshuisvestingconges’, Local Techniek 9/1 (1940): 29.Google Scholar

43 Schultz, Razoux, ‘De N. V. Volkshuisvesting in de Practijk’, pp. 139–40. For additional discussion on financial constraints see Cobban, ‘Kampungs and Conflict’, pp. 287–9Google Scholar

44 See for example Rondinelli, Dennis A., ‘Housing the Urban Poor in Developing Countries’, The American Journal of economics and sociology 49–2 (04 1990): 153–66;CrossRefGoogle ScholarNientied, Peter and Linden, Jan van der, ‘Approaches to Low-Income Housing in the Third World’, in The Urbanzation of the Third World ed. Josef, Gugler (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 138–56;Google ScholarCheema, G. Shabbir (ed.), Reaching the Urban Poor: Project Implementation in Developing Countries (Boulder: Westview Press, 1986);Google ScholarCheema, G. Shabbir, Urban Shelter and Services (New York: Praeger, 1987);Google ScholarSilas, John, ‘Indonesia–Ha (London: Croom Helm, 1987), pp. 135–58;Google ScholarAngel, Shlomo et al. , Land for Housing the Poor (Singapore: Select Books, 1983);Google ScholarPeter, Ward (ed.), Self-help Housing (London: Mansell, 1982).Google Scholar