Last updated 10th July 2024: Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 January 2016
The article draws a comparison between nineteenth-century Turin and Rome, linking the growth of technical bureaucracies in the municipal institutions of both cities to the local struggles for control over urban space. In both post-1848 Turin and post-1870 Rome, the implementation of new institutional reforms offered local city councils an opportunity to gain more power and autonomy than they had enjoyed in the recent past. The organization and the role of municipal technical services were therefore affected, with quite opposite results, by the conflicts opened with the state about the redefinition of the province of local government
1. Melis, Guido, Storia dell'amministrazione italiana, 1861–1993 , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1996, chapter I, pp. 15–113; Volpi, Franco, Le finanze dei comuni e delle provincie del Regno d'Italia, 1860–1890, Archivio Economico dell'Unificazione Italiana, s. II, vol. 5, Ilte, Turin, 1962.Google Scholar
2. Meridiana, 4, 1988 (monographic issue on Poteri locali); Romanelli, Raffaele, Il comando impossibile. Stato e società nell'Italia liberale , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1988, pp. 31–75; idem., ‘Centralismo e autonomie’, in idem. (ed.), Storia dello Stato italiano dall'Unità a oggi, Donzelli, Rome, 1995, pp. 125–186.Google Scholar
3. The widest attempt so far at a comparative approach to the history of Italy's nineteenth-century local administrations is the collective research promoted by the Istituto per la scienza dell'amministrazione pubblica for the centennial of Crispi's reforms: Isap, , Le riforme crispine, vol. 3, Amministrazione locale , Giuffrè, Milan, 1990, with a series of essays on Bologna, Como, Genova, Lucca, Mantova, Modena, Pavia, Rieti, Siena and Udine. The volume also includes a comparative essay by Mariapia Bigaran on local bureaucracies (‘Il personale burocratico’, pp. 859–892), whose data, taken from an 1897 census of municipal employees, are unfortunately aggregated by province. See also Mozzarelli, Cesare and Ferrari, Ermanno (eds), Il governo delle città nell'Italia giolittiana. Proposte di storia dell'amministrazione locale , Reverdito, , Trento, 1992. On Naples see, more recently, Machetti, Giulio, ‘La lobby di piazza Municipio: gli impiegati municipali nella Napoli di fine Ottocento’, Meridiana, 38–39, 2000, pp. 223–267.Google Scholar
4. Turin, which had been for centuries the capital city of Piedmont, became the first capital of Italy in 1860. National government moved to Florence in 1865 and to Rome in 1871, after the seizure of Porta Pia. Caracciolo, Alberto, ‘Le tre capitali d'Italia: Torino, Firenze, Roma’, in De Seta, Cesare (ed.), Le città capitali , Laterza, Rome–Bari, 1985, pp. 195–200.Google Scholar
5. Petracchi, Adriana, Le origini dell'ordinamento comunale e provinciale italiano. Storia della legislazione piemontese sugli enti locali dalla fine dell'antico regime al chiudersi dell'età cavouriana (1770–1861) , Neri Pozza, Venice, 1962.Google Scholar
6. Such was not always the case for Europe's nineteenth-century capital cities, as Thomas Hall has suggested in his study dealing with urban design issues. In this field, he argues, the degree of interference from central government in local urban affairs was highly variable. Hall, Thomas, Planning Europe's Capital Cities. Aspects of Nineteenth Century Urban Development , Spon, London, 1997, pp. 276 ff. Google Scholar
7. Clifton, Gloria C., Professionalism, Patronage and Public Service in Victorian London. The Staff of the Metropolitan Board of Works, 1856–1889 , The Athlone Press, London and Atlantic Highlands, NJ, 1992. We are quoting the title of Varni, Angelo and Melis, Guido (eds), Burocrazie non burocratiche. Il lavoro dei tecnici nelle amministrazioni tra Otto e Novecento, Rosenberg and Sellier, Turin, 1999. For the history of the engineering profession in Italy, see Minesso, Michela, ‘The Engineering Profession 1802–1923’, in Malatesta, Maria (ed.), Society and the Professions in Italy, 1860–1914, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 175–219; and, more recently, Giuntini, Andrea and Minesso, Michela (eds), Gli ingegneri in Italia tra ‘800 e ’900, FrancoAngeli, Milan, 1999.Google Scholar
8. For an overview of municipal tasks in the field of urban design, see De Luca, Giuseppe, ‘Le funzioni urbanistiche’, in Isap, , Le riforme crispine , Vol. 3, pp. 931–955.Google Scholar
9. Zucconi, Guido, La città contesa. Dagli ingegneri sanitari agli urbanisti (1885–1942) , Jaca Books, Milan, 1989.Google Scholar
10. Pischedda, Carlo and Roccia, Rosanna (eds), 1848. Dallo Statuto Albertino alla nuova legge municipale. Il primo Consiglio comunale elettivo di Torino , Archivio Storico del Comune, Turin, 1995. Foglino, Alessandra, ‘Amministratori Comunali di Torino (1815–1975)’, Atti e Rassegna Tecnica della Società degli Ingegneri e degli Architetti in Torino, n.s., 23, 9–10 (1979) provides complete lists of Turin's nineteenth-century city councillors.Google Scholar
11. Balani, Donatella, Il Vicario e la città. La politica e l'annona nella Torino del Settecento , Deputazione Subalpina di Storia Patria, Turin, 1987. Worth mentioning is also the consiglio degli edili, a permanent committee nominated by the King which was charged with the approbation of many projects for private and public buildings and urban plans. Its tasks were drastically reduced after 1848; in 1860, the consiglio was finally suppressed, and replaced with a municipal commissione d'ornato. De Pieri, Filippo, ‘L'expertise manquée. Le Conseil des Ediles et le développement urbain de Turin, 1822–1848’, forthcoming publication in Bourillon, Florence and de Lille, Laurent Coudroy (eds), Expertise et décision urbaines, Université Paris XII/Centre Jean-Baptiste Say, Créteil, 2002.Google Scholar
12. Changes in municipal finance provide a good illustration of this state of affairs. The revenues of the town duties, which had been transferred to the crown in 1815, were given back to the city in 1851, thus recognizing the important political role played by the city and its new condition of administrative ‘normality’ (octrois were generally the main financial resource for the Kingdom's cities). In previous years, lack of financial resources had been a chronic weakness for the Restoration city council. Repaci, Francesco Antonio, ‘I dazi di consumo della città di Torino nell'ultimo secolo’, La Riforma Sociale , January–February 1927, pp. 35–65.Google Scholar
13. The plan had been discussed in the 1840s and established for the most part in 1846–47, but was approved only in 1851–52 (in three separate parts), after a controversy between the city and the Ministry of Public Works. The conflict ended with the promulgation of a law (1851) which clarified that approbation of city plans did not require a parliamentary vote. The issues at stake in the conflict were not procedural: the question of parliamentary approbation had been posed by state ministers in an attempt to force Turin's municipality to modify the scheme. The whole conflict was somewhat paradoxical, since Turin's city council institutional predecessor, the corpo decurionale, had often been hostile to what appeared as a government-promoted plan in the years before 1847. Documents on the question in Comoli, Vera (ed.), ‘Il “Piano d'Ingrandiment o della Capitale” (1851–1852)’, in Storia dell'Urbanistica. Piemonte I , Edizioni Kappa, Rome, 1987; idem. and Fasoli, Vilma (eds), 1851–1852. Il Piano d'Ingrandiment o della Capitale, Archivio Storico del Comune, Turin, 1996, whose interpretative framework differs considerably from the one adopted here.Google Scholar
14. De Pieri, Filippo, ‘Réseaux de chemin de fer et espace urbain au XIXe siècle: la question de l'emplacement de la gare de Porta Susa à Turin’, Revue d'Histoire des Chemins de Fer , 23, Autumn 2000, pp. 22–15.Google Scholar
15. The organization of Paris’ technical offices provides a typical example. Châtelet, Anne–Marie, ‘La conception haussmannienn e du rôle desingénieurs et architectes municipaux’, in Des Cars, Jean and Pinon, Pierre (eds), Paris-Haussmann , Picard/Editions du Pavillon de l'Arsenal, Paris, 1991, pp. 257–266.Google Scholar
16. Salvatore Adorno's works on the Sicilian city of Siracusa provide a classic example of a nineteenth-century local bureaucracy which was not independent from political variables at both local and non-local levels. Adorno, Salvatore, ‘Professionisti, famiglie e amministrazione in una periferia: Siracusa 1860–1930’, in Malatesta, Maria (ed.), Storia d'Italia, Annali, 10: I professionisti , Einaudi, Turin, 1996, pp. 623–665; idem., ‘Storie di impiegati comunali in una città meridionale dell'Ottocento’, in Soresina, Marco (ed.), Colletti bianchi. Ricerche su impiegati, funzionari e tecnici in Italia fra ‘800 e ’900, FrancoAngeli, Milan, 1998, pp. 72–109; idem. (ed.), Siracusa, identità e storia , Lombardi, Arnaldo, Palermo–Siracusa, 1998.Google Scholar
17. Even when special external committees were appointed by the municipality for special projects, the office could play an important role: such was the case of the studies for the Ceronda canal (1864–68), when the project of head engineer Edoardo Pecco was finally chosen. Pecco, Edoardo, Progetto per condurre in Torino le acque della Ceronda ad uso di forza motrice. Relazione , 15 April 1868, ASCT, Affari Lavori Pubblici, cart. 28, fasc. 10.Google Scholar
18. For a more detailed analysis of these processes, see De Pieri, Filippo, ‘Nineteenth-Century Municipal Engineers in Turin’, forthcoming publication in Michèle Dagenais, Maver, Irene and Saunier, Pierre-Yves (eds), Municipal Services and Employees in the Modern City , Ashgate, Aldershot, 2003.Google Scholar
19. Galbani, Annamaria, ‘L'ufficio tecnico municipale da Domenico Cesa Bianchi a Giovanni Masera’, in Rozzi, Renato, Boriani, Maurizio and Rossari, Augusto (eds), La Milano del piano Beruto (1884–1889). Società, urbanistica e architettura nella seconda metà dell'Ottocento , Guerini e associati, Milan, 1992, Vol. 1, pp. 173–189.Google Scholar
20. Bartoloni, Emiliano, L'amministrazione di Roma sotto il pontificato di Pio IX (1846–1870) , in De Nicolò, Marco (ed.), L'amministrazione comunale di Roma. Legislazione, fonti archivistiche e documentarie, storiografia , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1996, pp. 35–54. See also De Nicolò, Marco (ed.), La prefettura di Roma (1871–1946), Il Mulino, Bologna, 1998.Google Scholar
21. Grispigni, Francesco, Rendiconto morale dell'amministrazione comunale di Roma. Sessione di primavera 1872 , Tip. Salviucci, Rome, 1872, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
22. Pianciani, Luigi, Relazione della commissione formata dai consiglieri Bompiani, Manassei, Pianciani, Piperno e Ruspoli sull'ordo capitolino , ASC, 13295, 9.Google Scholar
23. Gabinetto del sindaco, servizio generale, guardia nazionale. Google Scholar
24. The total number of employees proposed by the commission was 138, thirty-four of which (24.6 per cent) devoted to the technical office. Figures for Turin in 1867 provide a comparable total of 114 municipal employees, only fourteen of which (12.3 per cent) were part of the technical office. Figures for 1867 Turin are taken from AM, 1868, part I, pp. 76 ff. Google Scholar
25. ASC, Gabinetto del Sindaco , 1873, posizione 4. In the same years, Turin was not following a similar path towards simplification. On the contrary, the number of municipal offices kept growing, up to a total of twenty in 1882. Only in 1883 was this number reduced to nine and, as in the Roman case, Turin's offices were placed under the direct control of an assessore. AM, 1884, pp. 18, 89 ff. Google Scholar
26. On the origins of these urban institutions, see Verdi, Orietta, Maestri di edifici e di strode a Roma nel secolo XV. Fonti e problemi , R.R., Rome, 1997.Google Scholar
27. Acquedotti e fontane; Strode urbane; Strode comunali; Fabbriche, caserme, passeggiate e vivaio. ASC, Atti del Consiglio Municipale, 21 October 1871. In 1874 the subdivision was changed, and five divisions were created: Manutenzione; Idraulica; Costruzioni; Architettura; and Telegrafi (until 1875). A sixth section, Ispettorato Edilizio, was not included in the new scheme. From 1871 to 1876, at the head of the divisione Acque e Strade was engineer De Arcangelis. Angelo Vescovali directed the Ufficio Idraulico. The archives of the whole technical office were classified during the implementation of the first Fascist reform of municipal technical services (delibera Regio Commissario n. 198, 8 February 1924). They now appear as ASC, Pratiche diverse agli atti, 1853–1908, fasc. 1–4553.Google Scholar
28. Further changes became effective in 1877, 1880 and 1883. See ASC, Atti Consiglio Municipale, 9 December 1872 (Sistemazione amministrativa dell'Ufficio V), 16 May 1877 (Modifica alle strutture dell'Ufficio V), 7 June 1878, 27 June 1878.Google Scholar
29. Sepe, Stefano, ‘Amministrazione e “nazionalizzazione”. Il ruolo della burocrazia statale nella costruzione dello Stato unitario (1861–1900)’, in Meriggi, Marco and Schiera, Pierangelo (eds), Dalla città alla nazione. Borghesie ottocentesche in Italia e in Germania , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1993 (Annali dell'Istituto Storico Italo-Germanico in Trento, 36), pp. 307–341.Google Scholar
30. Betocchi, Alessandro, Atti della commissione istituita con decreto del Ministro dei Lavori Pubblici 1 Gennaio 1871 per studiare e proporre i mezzi di rendere le piene del Tevere innocue alla città di Roma , ASC, 8142.Google Scholar
31. Bocquet, Denis, ‘Technique, espace et société. Réflexion sur les infrastructures urbaines de Rome capitale, 1870–1922’, Roma moderna e contemporanea , VII, 1–2, 1999, pp. 107–123.Google Scholar
32. Insolera, Italo, Roma moderna. Un secolo di storia urbanistica, 1870–1970 , Einaudi, Turin, 1993; Vidotto, Vittorio, Roma contemporane a, Laterza, Rome–Bari, 2001.Google Scholar
33. Bartoccini, Fiorella, Roma nell'Ottocento. Il tramonto della ‘città santa’, nascità di una capitale , Cappelli, Bologna, 1985.Google Scholar
34. Caracciolo, Alberto, Roma capitale. Dal Risorgimento alla crisi dello stato liberale , Editori Riuniti, Rome, 1956, 1995.Google Scholar
35. ASC, Pratiche diverse dagli atti, Costruzione dei nuovi quartieri , 29 Cassette, 2153 fasc, 1871–1888.Google Scholar
36. Caravale, Mario, ‘Le leggi speciali per Roma dell'Ottocento’, in De Nicolò, (ed.), L'amministrazione comunale , pp. 131–162.Google Scholar
37. Alaimo, Aurelio, L'organizzazione della città. Amministrazione e politica urbana a Bologna dopo l'Unità (1859–1889) , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1990.Google Scholar
38. Sorteni, Stefano, ‘L'ingegnere nell'ente locale: istituzione e funzionamento dell'ufficio tecnico del Comune di Venezia’, in Cosmai, Franca and Sorteni, Stefano (eds), L'ingegneria civile a Venezia. Istituzioni, uomini, professioni da Napoleone al fascismo , Marsilio, Venice, 2001, pp. 63–93.Google Scholar
39. Sorba, Carlotta, ‘Tecnici municipali nell'Italia liberale: percorsi di reclutamento e identità professionali’, in Soresina, (ed.), Colletti bianchi , pp. 134–147.Google Scholar
40. Adorno, , ‘Professionisti, famiglie e amministrazione’; idem., ‘Storie di impiegati comunali’.Google Scholar
41. Galbani, , ‘L'ufficio tecnico municipale’.Google Scholar
42. Caracciolo, , Roma capitale , pp. 211–227.Google Scholar
43. Baldissara, Luca, ‘Conflitti d'identità. Municipalismo, localismo e integrazione politica in area padana’, Meridiana , 32, 1998, pp. 63–95.Google Scholar
44. Riall, Lucy, The Italian Risorgimento: State, Society and National Unification , Routledge, London, 1994; idem., Sicily and the Unification of Italy. Liberal Policy and Local Power, 1859–1866, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998.Google Scholar
