Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T14:33:57.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of 2D MoS2 and WS2 Dispersed in Organic Solvents for Composite Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2016

Alberto Delgado
Affiliation:
Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas, El Paso, TX 79969 USA
Jorge A. Catalan
Affiliation:
Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas, El Paso, TX 79969 USA
Hisato Yamaguchi
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MPA-11 Materials Synthesis & Integrated Devices, Materials Physics and Applications Division, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 USA
Claudia Narvaez Villarrubia
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MPA-11 Materials Synthesis & Integrated Devices, Materials Physics and Applications Division, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 USA
Aditya D. Mohite
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory, MPA-11 Materials Synthesis & Integrated Devices, Materials Physics and Applications Division, P.O. Box 1663, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545 USA
Anupama B. Kaul*
Affiliation:
Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, University of Texas, El Paso, TX 79969 USA Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Texas, El Paso, TX 79969 USA
*
*Email: akaul@utep.edu
Get access

Abstract

In this work, we have explored the prospects of MoS2 and WS2, both of which are semiconducting 2D materials, for potential composite applications. In order to form 2D materials composites we have to first disperse them chemically in solution. MoS2 and WS2 powders were oversaturated in N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) solution at 37.5 mg/mL and sonicated at room temperature (RT) for sonication times ranging from 30 minutes to close to 24 hours. After solution processing, the samples with the 2D flakes were transferred to an Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) bath for particle size distribution analysis. We have observed significant changes in particle size distribution spanning two orders of magnitude as a function of the sonication conditions. Specifically, the observed changes in particle size distribution for MoS2 and WS2 powders ranged from 44 microns down to 0.409 microns, and 148 microns down to 0.409, respectively, as compared to the untreated materials. Structural analysis was conducted using the SEM and X-Ray diffraction. The structural analysis using the SEM revealed morphological signatures between the two materials, where the MoS2 flakes had a randomly oriented distribution with occasional triangular flakes. In the case of the WS2, regardless of the sonication conditions, the WS2 flakes seemed to have a characteristic 120° angular distribution at the vertices, representing a rhombus with concave edges. The XRD analysis showed a minute shift in the characteristic peaks that maybe due to strain-induced effects as a result of the solution processing. Optical characterization of the materials was also conducted using Raman Spectroscopy to validate the average layer number resulting from the solution dispersions and the spatial and compositional uniformity of the two material samples.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Liu, C.-X. and Choi, J.-W., “An embedded PDMS nanocomposite strain sensor toward biomedical applications,” in Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 2009.Google Scholar
Giorgino, T., Tormene, P., Lorussi, F., Rossi, D. D. and Quaglini, S., “Sensor evaluation for wearable strain gauges in neurological rehabilitation,” Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 17, pp. 409415, 2009.Google Scholar
Lorussi, F., Scilingo, E. P., Tesconi, M., Tognetti, A. and Rossi, D. D., “Strain sensing fabric for hand posture and gesture monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on, vol. 9, pp. 372381, 2005.Google Scholar
Helmer, R., Farrow, D., Ball, E. P. K., Farouil, A. and Blanchonette, I., “A pilot evaluation of an electronic textile for lower limb monitoring and interactive biofeedback,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 13, pp. 513518, 2011.Google Scholar
Liu, C.-X. and Choi, J.-W., “Patterning conductive PDMS nanocomposite in an elastomer using microcontact printing,” Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 19, p. 085019, 2009.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. N., Lotya, M., O’Neill, A., Bergin, S. D., King, P. J., Khan, U., Young, K., Gaucher, A., De, S., Smith, R. J., Shvets, I. V., Arora, S. K., Stanton, G., Kim, H.-Y., Lee, K., Tae Kim, G., Duesberg, G. S., Hallam, T., Boland, J. J., Wang, J. J., Donegan, J. F., Grunlan, J. C., Moriarty, G., Shmeliov, A., Nicholls, R. J., Perkins, J. M., Grieveson, E. M., Theuwissen, K., McComb, D. W., , P. D. N. and Nicolosi, V., “Two-Dimensional Nanosheets Produced by Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials,” Science, Vol. 331, pp. 568571, 2011.Google Scholar
Rautaray, S. S. and Agrawal, A., “Interaction with virtual game through hand gesture recognition,” IMPACT, pp. 244–247, 2011.Google Scholar
Cunningham, G., Lotya, M., Cucinotta, C. S., Sanvito, S., Bergin, S. D., Menzel, R., Shaffer, M. S. P., and Coleman, J. N., “Solvent Exfoliation of Transition Metal Dichalcogenides: Dispersibility of Exfoliated Nanosheets Varies Only Weakly between Compounds,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, pp. 34683480, 2012.Google Scholar
Delgado, A., Catalan, J. A., Yamaguchi, H., Villarrubia, C. N., Mohite, A. D. and Kaul, A. B., “Characterization of 2D sulfides and graphene composites for sensing applications,” manuscript submitted for publication (in review)Google Scholar