Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T09:19:26.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics for De-Extracellular Matrix(ECM)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2018

Namsoo P. Kim*
Affiliation:
Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA Printing Nano Engineering Lab, Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
Jihye Kim*
Affiliation:
Printing Nano Engineering Lab, Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
Guikuan Yue
Affiliation:
Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
Diana Cho
Affiliation:
Printing Nano Engineering Lab, Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering Department, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA
*
*(Email: nkim@utep.edu)
Get access

Abstract

A kinetic model for ECM decellularization with Trypsin and Deoxycholic Acid as reactants in a batch system has been developed. The decellularization mechanism has been analysed by solving a series of ordinary differential equations relating heterogeneous reaction kinetics at the solid/liquid interface to mass transfer of reactant and products. In order to remove the Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of porcine, special emphasis has been given to the surface area for regulating the depth and amount of the penetration of the reagent, the numerical analysis thereof, and the corresponding experiment were carried out. The effect of chemical reaction order, rate constants and mass transfer coefficients on the overall decellularization rate has been analysed and discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hoshiba, T., Lu, H., Kawazoe, N. and Chen, G., Expert Opin. Biol. Ther., 10(12), 17171728 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B.N., Freund, J.M., Han, L. and Rubin, J.P., Tissue Engineering: Part C., 17, 411421 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, N. and Han, K., Miner. & Met. Proc., 6(2), 111120 (2006).Google Scholar
Bosman, F.T. and Stamenkovic, I., J Pathol., 200(4), 423428 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Y. and Choi, J., Tissue Engineering: Part C., 18(11), 866876 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crapo, P.M. and Gilbert, T.W., Biomaterials, 32(12), 32333243 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosens, A. and Somers, P., Ann Biomed Eng., 44(9), 28272839 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partington, L. and Mordan, N.J., Acta Biomater, 9(2), 52515261 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reing, J.E. and Brown, B.N., Biomaterials, 31(33), 86268633 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar