Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:43:02.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-Time Nanogravimetric Monitoring of Corrosion in Radioactive Decontamination Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2016

Ioannis Tzagkaroulakis
Affiliation:
Lancaster University, Engineering Department, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.
Colin Boxall*
Affiliation:
Lancaster University, Engineering Department, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom.
Divyesh Trivedi
Affiliation:
National Nuclear Laboratory, Warrington, WA3 6AE, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

Monitoring and understanding of corrosion on nuclear sites is key to safe asset management (predicting plant life, assessing efficacy of corrosion inhibitors for plant lifetime extension) and supporting informed choice of decontamination methods for steels due for decommissioning. Recent advances in Quartz Crystal Nanobalance (QCN) technology offer a means to monitor corrosion in-situ in radiologically harsh environments, in real time and with high sensitivity.

Oxalic acid has been widely used in nuclear facilities as a corrosion inhibitor for carbon steels and as a decontamination cleaning agent due to its ability to remove rust from the surface of ferritic metals and alloys. As an exemplar system for decontamination, the corrosion behavior of pure iron samples in 1 wt% oxalic acid solution has, for the first time, been measured in simulated radioactive environments in real time, in situ using the QCN. Results show that the QCN is a promising tool for studying the efficacy of oxalic acid decontamination agent formulations with the sensor providing useful mechanistic information regarding decontaminating agent mode-of-action derived from the mass change (gain or loss) in real time when a quartz crystal is immersed in oxalic acid solution in simulated and non–simulated radioactive environments.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Foran, P. S. and Boxall, C., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp., 1406 (2012).Google Scholar
Wilbraham, R. J., Boxall, C., and Taylor, R. J., J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., 249, 2128 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, R. M. and Williams, W. J., Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc, 77, 265274 (1984).Google Scholar
Spires, R., Ketusky, E., Barton, B., and Jones, D., WM2010 Conf., (2010).Google Scholar
Rahfield, S. and Newman, B., U.S. Patent No. 4 828 743 (9 May 1989).Google Scholar
Streicher, M. A., U.S. Patent No. 2 793 190 (21 May 1957).Google Scholar
Ketusky, E., Subramanian, K., and Wiersma, B., WM2011Conf., 11413 (2011).Google Scholar
Pouran, S., Raman, A., and Daud, W., J. Clean. Prod., 64, 2435 (2014).Google Scholar
Salgado, P., Melin, V., Contreras, D., Moreno, Y., and Mansilla, H. D., J. Chil. Chem. Soc.., 58, (4), 20962101 (2013).Google Scholar
Wang, C., Liu, H., and Sun, Z., Int. J. Photoenergy, 2012, (1), 110, (2012).Google Scholar
Bautista, P., Mohedano, A. F., Casas, J. A., Zazo, J. A., and Rodriguez, J. J., J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 83, 13231338 (2008).Google Scholar
Song, T., Kim, I., and Rho, S., J. Korean Nucl. Soc.., 27, (4), 453462 (1995).Google Scholar
Tzagkaroulakis, I. and Boxall, C., ECS Trans.., 66, (17), 7383 (2015).Google Scholar
Tzagkaroulakis, I., Boxall, C., and Trivedi, D., WM2016 Conf, 16170 (2016).Google Scholar
Cartledge, G. H., Electrochem, J.. Soc., 104, 420426 (1957).Google Scholar
Qin, Z., Demko, B., Noel, J., Shoesmith, D., King, F., Worthingham, R., and Keith, K., Corros. 2004, 60, (10), 906914 (2004).Google Scholar