Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T22:08:40.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular dynamics simulations of ballistic penetration of penta-graphene sheets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2018

David L. Azevedo*
Affiliation:
Physics Institute, University of Brasilia, Brasília-DF, 70910900, Brazil. Planaltina College, University of Brasilia, CEP 73345-10, Planaltina-DF, Brazil. Applied Physics Department and Center of Computational Engineering and Science, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas-SP13083-959, Brazil.
Rafael A. Bizao
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Department and Center of Computational Engineering and Science, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas-SP13083-959, Brazil.
Douglas S. Galvao
Affiliation:
Applied Physics Department and Center of Computational Engineering and Science, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas-SP13083-959, Brazil.
Get access

Abstract

The search for new materials with low density and superior mechanical properties is a very intense and stimulating investigation area. These new materials could provide potential application for ballistic protection. Recent experiments and simulations revealed graphene possesses exceptional energy absorption properties. In this work, we analysed through fully atomistic molecular dynamics simulations the ballistic performance of a carbon-based material recently proposed named penta-graphene. Our results show that the fracture pattern is more spherical (no petals formation like observed for graphene). The estimated penetration energy for single-layer penta-graphene structures obtained here was d1penta ∼ 37.7 MJ/kg, and is comparable with recently results obtained for graphene: d1graphene ∼ 29.0 MJ/kg and d1graphene ∼ 40.8 MJ/kg under similar conditions. These preliminary results are suggestive that penta-graphene could be an excellent material for ballistic applications.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lee, J.-H., Loya, P. E., Lou, J., and Thomas, E. L., Science 346, 1092 (2014).Google Scholar
Haque, B. Z. G., Chowdhury, S. C. and Gillespie, J. W. Jr., Carbon 102, 126 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Zhou, J., Wang, Q., Chen, X., Kawazoe, Y., and Jena, P., PNAS 112, 2372 (2015).Google Scholar
Yoon, K., Ostadhossein, A., and van Duin, A. C. T., Carbon 99, 58 (2016).Google Scholar
Bizao, R. A., Machado, L. D., de Sousa, J. M., Pugno, N. M., and Galvao, D. S., arXiv:1701.07367 (2017).Google Scholar
de Sousa, J M., Aguiar, A. L., Girao, E. C., Fonseca, A. F., Souza Filho, A. G., and Galvao, D. S., arXiv:1703.03789 (2017).Google Scholar
van Duin, C. T., Dasgupta, S., Lorant, F., and Goddard, W. A. III, J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9396 (2001).Google Scholar
Plimpton, S., J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
Mueller, J. E., van Duin, A. C. T. and Goddard, W. A. III, J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 4939 (2010).Google Scholar
Pugno, N. M., Acta Materialia 55, 1947 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, K., Zhan, H., Hu, D., and Gu, Y., Sci. Rep. 6, 33139 (2016).Google Scholar