Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T22:25:42.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparation of Macroporous Carboxymethyl Cellulose Cryogels and Its Blood Compatibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2019

Nurettin Saniner Open the ORCID record for Nurettin Saniner [Opens in a new window] ,
Selin S. Suner  and
Murat Tosunoglu
Nurettin Saniner*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science & Arts, and Nanoscience and Technology Research and Application Center (NANORAC) Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Terzioglu Campus, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey. Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Eye Institute,12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Selin S. Suner
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science & Arts, and Nanoscience and Technology Research and Application Center (NANORAC) Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Terzioglu Campus, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey.
Murat Tosunoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science & Arts, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Terzioglu Campus, 17100, Canakkale, Turkey.
*
*(Email: sahiner71@gmail.com)
Get access

Abstract

Superporous Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (CMC) cryogels were synthesized by chemical crosslinking of linear CMC with divinyl sulfone (DVS) with different mole ratios of CMC repeating unit down to 2.5%. The morphology of macroporous CMC cryogels was visualized by optic microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. The swelling capacity and pore volume of CMC cryogels were found to increase with the decrease in the ratio of crosslinker to CMC, and the highest swelling capacity and pore volume values were 10825±1799% and 22.1±0.4 mL/g for 2.5% mole ratio of crosslinked CMC cryogels. The blood compatibility of CMC cryogels revealed that blood cells were destroyed with very low hemolysis ratio of 1.09±1% and also showed less thrombogenic activity with 80.2±5.1% blood clotting indexes.

Keywords

microstructurebiomaterialporosity
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 5 , Issue 16: Soft Materials and Biomaterials , 2020 , pp. 825 - 833
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Wang, S., Lu, A. and Zhang, L., Prog. Polym. Sci. 53, 169-206 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maftoonazad, N. and Ramaswamy, H. S., LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 38, 617-624 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, P., He, H., Cai, R., Tao, G., Yang, M., Zuo, H., Umar, A. and Wang, Y., Carbohydr. Polym. 212, 403-411 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavan, R. B., Rathi, S., Jyothi, V. G. S. S. and Shastri, N. R., Assian J. Pharm. Sci. 14, 248-264 (2018).Google Scholar
Reichelt, S., Becher, J., Weisser, J., Prager, A., Decker, U., Möller, S., Berg, A. and Schnabelrauch, M., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 35, 164-170 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odabas, S., J. Bioact. Compat. Pol. 31, 411-422 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okay, O. and Lozinsky, V.I., Adv. Polym. Sci. 263, 103-157 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sengel, S. B., Sahiner, M., Aktas, N. and Sahiner, N., Appl. Clay Sci. 140, 66-74 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madaghiele, M., Salvatore, L., Demitri, C. and Sannino, A., Materials Letters 218, 305-308 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demirci, S., Suner, S.S., Sahiner, M. and Sahiner, N., Eur. Polym. J. 93, 775-784 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meena, L. K., Raval, P., Kedaria, D. and Vasita, R., Bioact. Mater. 3, 370-384 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar