Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T21:17:37.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Why steel in construction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2016

Barbara Shollock
Affiliation:
Warwick Manufacturing Group, University of Warwick, UK; b.shollock@warwick.ac.uk
Digvijay Thakur
Affiliation:
Tata Steel Research and Development, UK; Digvijay.Thakur@tatasteel.com
Graham Couchman
Affiliation:
Steel Construction Institute, UK; g.couchman@steel-sci.com
Get access

Abstract

Timber, steel, and concrete form the triumvirate of structural materials used in construction. Each material possesses particular attributes, with cost and ease of use often providing the determining factor in selection when structural requirements are equal. This article aims to provide insight into the unique capabilities that steel can offer in construction. Beginning with the advent of the Industrial Revolution, developments in alloy chemistry, impurity control, and thermomechanical processing to produce different geometries have continued to make steel an attractive choice in residential and commercial construction. Changing demographics and the needs of future cities are discussed in terms of steel construction members, construction strategies, and functional coatings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mowey, D.C., Rosenberg, N., Technology and the Pursuit of Economic Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1989), p. 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamsuddin, M., Physical Chemistry of Metallurgical Processes (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2016), p. 234.Google Scholar
Hillstrom, K., Hillstrom, L.C., Eds., The Industrial Revolution in America: Iron and Steel (ABC-CLIO, Santa Barbara, CA, 2005), p. 40.Google Scholar
Fruehan, R.J., The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel, 11th ed., Steel Making and Refining Volume (AIST, Warrendale, PA, 1998).Google Scholar
Simms, W.I., Hughes, A.F., “Composite Design of Steel Framed Buildings” (Steel Construction Institute Publication SCI P359, UK, December 19, 2011).Google Scholar
Yandzio, E., Lawson, M., Way, A., “Light Steel Framing in Residential Buildings” (Steel Construction Institute Publication SCI P402, UK, June 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Heywood, M.D., “Best Practice for the Specification and Installation of Metal Cladding and Secondary Steelwork” (Steel Construction Institute Publication SCI P346, December 1, 2006).Google Scholar
Lim, M., “Thermal Mass Performance in Commercial Office Buildings” (Steel Construction Institute, Faber Maunsell Aecom, St Albans, UK June 11, 2007).Google Scholar
Rackham, J.W., Couchman, G.H., Hicks, S.J., “Composite Slabs and Beams Using Steel Decking: Best Practice for Design and Construction,” rev. ed. (Metal Cladding & Roofing Manufacturers Association paper 13, Steel Construction Institute Publication SCI P300, March 2009).Google Scholar
Bayer, C., Gamble, M., Gentry, R., Joshi, S., “AIA Guide to Building Life Cycle Assessment in Practice” (The American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC, 2010).Google Scholar
Kotaji, S., Schuurmans, A., Edwards, S., Life Cycle Assessment in Building and Construction: A State-of-the-Art Report (SETAC Europe Press, Brussels, 2003).Google Scholar
Davison, B., Owens, G.W., Eds., Steel Designers’ Manual, 6th ed. (Steel Construction Institute, Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 2005).Google Scholar
Mantal, S.K., Steel Metallurgy: Properties, Specifications and Applications, (McGraw-Hill, New York, February 1, 2015).Google Scholar
Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H., Honeycombe, R., Steels, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, Cambridge, UK, 2006).Google Scholar
ASM Handbook, Volume 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1990).Google Scholar
Montemor, M.F., Surf. Coat. Technol. 258, 17 (2014).Google Scholar
Karlessi, T., Santamouris, M., Apostolakis, K., Synnefa, A., Livada, I., Sol. Energy 83 (4), 538 (2009).Google Scholar
Feng, W., Patel, S.H., Young, M.-Y., Zunino, J.L. III, Xanthos, M., Adv. Polym. Technol. 26, 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shukla, A., Nkwetta, D.N., Cho, Y.J., Stevenson, V., Jones, P., Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 3975 (2012).Google Scholar
Barletta, M., Rubino, G., Tagliaferri, V., Vesco, S., Colloids Surf. A 455, 147 (2014).Google Scholar
“Tata Steel and Dyesol Produce World’s Largest Dye Sensitized Photovoltaic Module,” available at http://www.tatasteeleurope.com/en/news/news/2011/2011_dsc. News release, June 10, 2011.Google Scholar
Zhu, W., Bartos, P.J.M., Porro, A., Mater. Struct. 37, 649 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamauchi, K., Yao, Y., Ochiai, T., Sakai, M., Kubota, Y., Yamauchi, G., J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 380979 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagener, M., Hygienic Coatings & Surfaces, PRA Coatings Technology Centre, Paris, March 16–17, 2005, paper 14.Google Scholar
Thölmann, D., Kossmann, B., Sosna, F., Eur. Coat. J. 1, 16 (2003).Google Scholar
Sauvet, G., Dupond, S., Kazmierski, K., Chojnowski, J., J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 75, 1005 (2003).Google Scholar
Xu, T., Xie, C.S., Prog. Org. Coat. 46, 297 (2003).Google Scholar
Borkow, G., Hygienic Coatings & Surfaces, PRA Coatings Technology Centre, Paris, March 16–17, 2005.Google Scholar