Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T11:43:40.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tuned Tilt of Epitaxial Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

At first sight it may seem self-evident that epitaxial crystals must grow with their atomic planes parallel to the lattice planes of the substrate crystal. The simplified sketch in Figure 1a shows atoms raining onto a substrate from a molecular beam, and then diffusing to step-edges in a desirably controlled growth process termed step-edge (or ledge) flow. Drawn this way, the conclusion that the planes must lie parallel seems obvious. If, however, the process is heteroepitaxial, and the new lattice (solid circles) differs in spacing or structure from the substrate template (lines), the outcome is less straight-forward. Accommodating the difference of step heights at the interface then requires local tilts amounting to a fraction of one atomic spacing in, say, 25 atoms or perhaps half a degree, depending from one point to the next on details of the neighboring interfacial structure.

In what follows I describe a qualitatively different and newly discovered behavior we term coherent tilt. The coherent tilt process causes the atomic planes of the epilayer to grow at an accurately predictable and reproducible angle with respect to the substrate planes. The tilt axis, tilt angle, and sense of rotation remain precisely fixed over an entire substrate, with the result that the process occurs coherently over the dimensions of a macroscopic sample. Large tilts over 7° have already been produced with the angle predictable from first principles to 0.1° The characteristics of coherent tilt are sketched in Figure 1b.

Type
Technical Features
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Du, R-R. and Flynn, C.P., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2 (1990) p. 1335. Further articles to be published concern one-dimensional pseudomorphism (R-R. Du and C.P. Flynn); growth of hep Mg, Ti, and Zr (J.C.A. Huang, R-R. Du, and CP. Flynn); and growth of fee metals (J.C Huang and C.P. Flynn).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Somorjai, G., Chemistry in Two Dimensions (Cornell, NY, 1981).Google Scholar
3. See, e.g., McRae, E.G. and Malik, R.A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) p. 737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. A discussion of low-dimensional architecture is in Peercy, P., Mater. Res. 5 (1990) p. 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. For a review of thin film magnetism see Falicov, L.M. and Pierce, D., J. Mater. Res. 5 (1990), p. 1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zangwill, A., Physics at Surfaces, (Cambridge, NY, 1988) gives an introductory discussion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dodson, B.W., Myers, D.R., Datye, A.K., Kaushick, V.S., Kendall, D.L., and Martinez-Tovar, B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) p. 2681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mechanical behavior is described by Hirth, J.P. and Lothe, J., Theory of Dislocations, (Wiley, NY, 1982).Google Scholar
9. See, e.g., Herman, M.A. and Sitter, H., Molecular Beam Epitaxy, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989), or The Technology and Physics of Molecular Beam Epitaxy, edited by E.F.C. Parker (Plenum, NY, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. This point is established in the context of the metals discussed here by Huang, J.C.A., Du, R-R., and Flynn, C.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) p. 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Yadavalli, S., Yang, M-H., and Flynn, C.P., to be published.Google Scholar