Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T19:24:38.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using technology to enhance K–12 outreach in materials science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

Irene Polycarpou
Irene Polycarpou*
Affiliation:
Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA; ipolycar@mines.edu
Get access

Abstract

Most K–12 outreach programs worldwide within materials science and beyond rely on scientists visiting K–12 classrooms and assisting teachers with instruction and development of classroom materials, as well as developing on-site professional development workshops. Due to the limited time materials scientists and teachers have available for participating in K–12 outreach programs, more creative approaches are necessary to accommodate the needs of a broader spectrum of teachers and students. Incorporating technology into K–12 outreach programs is one approach that can be used to overcome some of the obstacles currently faced. This article discusses different manners in which technology can be included in K–12 materials science outreach programs, such as K–12 educational software and tools as well as online professional development programs. This article also draws on broader educational technology research to identify known challenges of incorporating technology into outreach programs and possible ways to overcome such challenges.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 36 , Issue 4: Addressing broader impacts through K–12 outreach in materials education , April 2011 , pp. 290 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., Roberts, D.F., Kaiser Family Foundation Study: Generation M2 (2010); www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf.Google Scholar
2.Bitter, G.G., Legacy, J.M., Using Technology in the Classroom,7th Edition (Pearson Education, Inc., United States, 2008).Google Scholar
3.Zhang, K., Bonk, C.J., Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology V34 (2) (2008); www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/viewArticle/496/227.Google Scholar
4.Bonk, C.J., Dennen, V.P., Technical Report: Massive Multiplayer Online Gaming: A Research Framework for Military Training and Education (2005); http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.153.9995.pdf.Google Scholar
5.Tan, J., Biswas, G., “Simulation-Based Game Learning Environments: Building and Sustaining a Fish Tank,” The first IEEE international workshop on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhancement Learning: DIGITEL’07 (2007).Google Scholar
6.Tuvi-Arad, I., Nachmias, R., J. Comput. Math. Sci. Teach. 22 (3), 225 (2003).Google Scholar
7.Thomas, R., Hooper, E., J. Res. Comput. Educ. 23 (4), 497 (1991).Google Scholar
8.McGregor, L., Hargrave, C., in Proc. Conf. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International, Crawford, C., Davis, N., Price, J., Weber, R., Willis, D.A.., Eds. (2003), pp. 3034.Google Scholar
9.Windschitl, M., Andre, T., J. Res. Sci. Teach. 35 (2) 145 (1998).3.0.CO;2-S>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Brant, G., Hooper, E., Sugrue, B., J. Educ. Comput. Res. 7 (4) 469 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Flick, L., Bell, R., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 1 (1) 39 (2000).Google Scholar
12.Chinn, C., Malhotra, B., Sci. Educ. 86 175 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Ireland, A., Kaufman, D., Sauvé, L., in Proc. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Reeves, T., Yamashita, S., Eds. (2006), pp. 2028.Google Scholar
14.Etuk, N., Educational Gaming: From Edutainment to Bona Fide 21st-Century Teaching Tool (2008); www.mmischools.com/Articles/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=59693.Google Scholar
15.Van Eck, R., EDUCAUSE Rev. 41 (2), 16 (2006).Google Scholar
16.Prensky, M., Digital Game-Based Learning (McGraw-Hill, NY, 2001).Google Scholar
17.Watson, R., Boggs, C., in Proc. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Bastiaens, T., Carliner, S., Eds. (2007), pp. 2170.Google Scholar
18.Wikipedia Definition of Podcast;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast.Google Scholar
19.Price, A., Gay, P., Searle, T., Brissenden, G., Astron. Educ. Rev. 5 (1), 53 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Brittain, S., Glowacki, P., Ittersum, V.J., Johnson, L., EDUCAUSE Q. 29 (3), 24 (2006).Google Scholar
21.Lee, J.W.M., Chan, A., Turk. Online J. Distance Educ. 8 (1), 85 (2007).Google Scholar
22.Piecka, D., Studnicki, E., Zuckerman-Parker, M., AACE J. 16 (2), 203 (2008).Google Scholar
23.Wikipedia definition of videoconference;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Videoconference.Google Scholar
24.Rusnak, B., in Proc. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Barker, P., Rebelsky, S., Eds. (2002), pp. 1687.Google Scholar
25.Falco, J., Barbanell, P., Newman, D., in Proc. World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Nall, J., Robson, R., Eds. (2004), pp. 1193.Google Scholar
26.Columbus Zoo Videoconference; www.vccontentproviders.org/viewprovider.php?cpid=6.Google Scholar
27.Labec, M., Luft, J., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 7 (1), 554 (2007).Google Scholar
28.Chan Lin, L., Hong, J., Horng, J., Chang, S., Chu, H., Innovations Educ. Teach. Int. 43 (1), 57 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Pelton, T., Francis Pelton, L., in Proc. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, McFerrin, K., Weber, R., Carlsen, R., Willis, D.A., Eds. (2008), pp. 4273.Google Scholar
30.Hayes, D.L., Jin, H.S., in Proc. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, Price, J., Willis, J., Willis, D.A., Muktha, J., Boger-Mehall, S., Eds. (1999), pp. 542.Google Scholar
31.Archambault, L., Crippen, K., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 7 (2), 59 (2007).Google Scholar
32.Shafer, G.K., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 8 (1), 27 (2008).Google Scholar
33.Kersaint, G., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 7 (4), 256 (2007).Google Scholar
34.Guzey, S.S., Roehrig, H.G., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 9 (1), 25 (2009).Google Scholar
35.One Laptop Per Child(OLPC) Project at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; one.laptop.orgGoogle Scholar
36.Engineering Information Foundation; www.eifgrants.org/about/Google Scholar
37.HP Catalyst Initiative; www.hp.com/hpinfo/socialinnovation/hpcatalyst-2010recipients.htmlGoogle Scholar
38.Light, D., Journal of Education for International Development (JEID), 4 (2), (2009); www.equip123.net/JEID/articles/4_2/Light.pdfGoogle Scholar
39.Kelly, A.M., in Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TCPK) for Educators (American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New York, 2008), pp. 31.Google Scholar
40.Koehler, J.M., Mishra, P., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 9 (1), 60 (2009).Google Scholar
41.Garofalo, J., Drier, H., Harper, S., Timmerman, A.M., Shockey, T., Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ. 1 (1), 66 (2000).Google Scholar